Assistive artificial intelligence for ultrasound image interpretation in regional anaesthesia: an external validation study.
anatomy
artificial intelligence
machine learning
regional anaesthesia
translational AI
ultrasonography
ultrasound
Journal
British journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 1471-6771
Titre abrégé: Br J Anaesth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
received:
06
04
2022
revised:
01
06
2022
accepted:
27
06
2022
pubmed:
21
8
2022
medline:
24
1
2023
entrez:
20
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ultrasonound is used to identify anatomical structures during regional anaesthesia and to guide needle insertion and injection of local anaesthetic. ScanNav Anatomy Peripheral Nerve Block (Intelligent Ultrasound, Cardiff, UK) is an artificial intelligence-based device that produces a colour overlay on real-time B-mode ultrasound to highlight anatomical structures of interest. We evaluated the accuracy of the artificial-intelligence colour overlay and its perceived influence on risk of adverse events or block failure. Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia experts acquired 720 videos from 40 volunteers (across nine anatomical regions) without using the device. The artificial-intelligence colour overlay was subsequently applied. Three more experts independently reviewed each video (with the original unmodified video) to assess accuracy of the colour overlay in relation to key anatomical structures (true positive/negative and false positive/negative) and the potential for highlighting to modify perceived risk of adverse events (needle trauma to nerves, arteries, pleura, and peritoneum) or block failure. The artificial-intelligence models identified the structure of interest in 93.5% of cases (1519/1624), with a false-negative rate of 3.0% (48/1624) and a false-positive rate of 3.5% (57/1624). Highlighting was judged to reduce the risk of unwanted needle trauma to nerves, arteries, pleura, and peritoneum in 62.9-86.4% of cases (302/480 to 345/400), and to increase the risk in 0.0-1.7% (0/160 to 8/480). Risk of block failure was reported to be reduced in 81.3% of scans (585/720) and to be increased in 1.8% (13/720). Artificial intelligence-based devices can potentially aid image acquisition and interpretation in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Further studies are necessary to demonstrate their effectiveness in supporting training and clinical practice. NCT04906018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ultrasonound is used to identify anatomical structures during regional anaesthesia and to guide needle insertion and injection of local anaesthetic. ScanNav Anatomy Peripheral Nerve Block (Intelligent Ultrasound, Cardiff, UK) is an artificial intelligence-based device that produces a colour overlay on real-time B-mode ultrasound to highlight anatomical structures of interest. We evaluated the accuracy of the artificial-intelligence colour overlay and its perceived influence on risk of adverse events or block failure.
METHODS
Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia experts acquired 720 videos from 40 volunteers (across nine anatomical regions) without using the device. The artificial-intelligence colour overlay was subsequently applied. Three more experts independently reviewed each video (with the original unmodified video) to assess accuracy of the colour overlay in relation to key anatomical structures (true positive/negative and false positive/negative) and the potential for highlighting to modify perceived risk of adverse events (needle trauma to nerves, arteries, pleura, and peritoneum) or block failure.
RESULTS
The artificial-intelligence models identified the structure of interest in 93.5% of cases (1519/1624), with a false-negative rate of 3.0% (48/1624) and a false-positive rate of 3.5% (57/1624). Highlighting was judged to reduce the risk of unwanted needle trauma to nerves, arteries, pleura, and peritoneum in 62.9-86.4% of cases (302/480 to 345/400), and to increase the risk in 0.0-1.7% (0/160 to 8/480). Risk of block failure was reported to be reduced in 81.3% of scans (585/720) and to be increased in 1.8% (13/720).
CONCLUSIONS
Artificial intelligence-based devices can potentially aid image acquisition and interpretation in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Further studies are necessary to demonstrate their effectiveness in supporting training and clinical practice.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT04906018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35987706
pii: S0007-0912(22)00351-8
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.06.031
pmc: PMC9900723
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04906018']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
217-225Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T019050/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jul;46(7):571-580
pubmed: 34145070
BJA Educ. 2018 Feb;18(2):52-56
pubmed: 33456810
Br J Anaesth. 1989 Sep;63(3):326-9
pubmed: 2679832
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1848-53
pubmed: 23863753
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):40-6
pubmed: 19258987
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):181-94
pubmed: 26695878
J Ultrasound. 2022 Jun;25(2):145-153
pubmed: 33675031
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Sep 15;4(1):137
pubmed: 34526639
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 May;69(5):e27-e54
pubmed: 28442101
Anaesthesia. 2020 Mar;75(3):293-297
pubmed: 31268173
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1067-1074
pubmed: 27492881
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1235:19-34
pubmed: 32488634
Anaesthesia. 2021 May;76(5):602-607
pubmed: 32726498
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Oct;2(10):e537-e548
pubmed: 33328048
Clin Anat. 2021 Jul;34(5):802-809
pubmed: 33904628
Anaesthesia. 2015 Sep;70(9):1084-91
pubmed: 25989611
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jun;47(6):375-379
pubmed: 35091395
J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(12):1235-7
pubmed: 2585014
J Anesth. 2021 Aug;35(4):591-594
pubmed: 34008072
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):503-511
pubmed: 33140228
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Feb;47(2):106-112
pubmed: 34552005
Clin Radiol. 2019 May;74(5):357-366
pubmed: 30898381
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 21;385(17):1593-1602
pubmed: 34670045
Br J Anaesth. 2019 May;122(5):e75-e77
pubmed: 30916020
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Sep;3(9):e543-e554
pubmed: 34446265