Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid May Be Assessed Earlier to Allow Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Unresponsive Primary Biliary Cholangitis.


Journal

Digestive diseases and sciences
ISSN: 1573-2568
Titre abrégé: Dig Dis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7902782

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2023
Historique:
received: 20 01 2022
accepted: 31 07 2022
pubmed: 22 8 2022
medline: 10 2 2023
entrez: 21 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has been traditionally assessed 1 to 2 years after treatment initiation. With the development of new drugs, some patients may benefit from an earlier introduction of second-line therapies. This study aims to identify whether well-validated response criteria could correctly identify individuals likely to benefit from add-on second-line therapy at 6 months. Analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort which included only patients with clear-cut PBC. 206 patients with PBC (96.6% women; mean age 54 ± 12 years) were included. Kappa concordance was substantial for Toronto (0.67), Rotterdam (0.65), Paris 1 (0.63) and 2 (0.63) criteria at 6 and 12 months, whereas Barcelona (0.47) and POISE trial (0.59) criteria exhibited moderate agreement. Non-response rates to UDCA was not statistically different when assessed either at 6 or 12 months using Toronto, Rotterdam or Paris 2 criteria. Those differences were even smaller or absent in those subjects with advanced PBC. Mean baseline alkaline phosphatase was 2.73 ± 1.95 times the upper limit of normal (× ULN) among responders versus 5.05 ± 3.08 × ULN in non-responders (p < 0.001). After 6 months of treatment with UDCA, the absence of response by different criteria could properly identify patients who could benefit from early addition of second-line therapies, especially in patients with advanced disease or high baseline liver enzymes levels.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has been traditionally assessed 1 to 2 years after treatment initiation. With the development of new drugs, some patients may benefit from an earlier introduction of second-line therapies.
AIMS
This study aims to identify whether well-validated response criteria could correctly identify individuals likely to benefit from add-on second-line therapy at 6 months.
METHODS
Analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort which included only patients with clear-cut PBC.
RESULTS
206 patients with PBC (96.6% women; mean age 54 ± 12 years) were included. Kappa concordance was substantial for Toronto (0.67), Rotterdam (0.65), Paris 1 (0.63) and 2 (0.63) criteria at 6 and 12 months, whereas Barcelona (0.47) and POISE trial (0.59) criteria exhibited moderate agreement. Non-response rates to UDCA was not statistically different when assessed either at 6 or 12 months using Toronto, Rotterdam or Paris 2 criteria. Those differences were even smaller or absent in those subjects with advanced PBC. Mean baseline alkaline phosphatase was 2.73 ± 1.95 times the upper limit of normal (× ULN) among responders versus 5.05 ± 3.08 × ULN in non-responders (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
After 6 months of treatment with UDCA, the absence of response by different criteria could properly identify patients who could benefit from early addition of second-line therapies, especially in patients with advanced disease or high baseline liver enzymes levels.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35989386
doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07654-x
pii: 10.1007/s10620-022-07654-x
doi:

Substances chimiques

Ursodeoxycholic Acid 724L30Y2QR
Cholagogues and Choleretics 0

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

514-520

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Corpechot C, Carrat F, Bonnand AM et al. The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on liver fibrosis progression in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2000;32:1196–1199.
doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.20240
Corpechot C, Abenavoli L, Rabahi N et al. Biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid and long-term prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2008;48:871–877.
doi: 10.1002/hep.22428
Harms MH, van Buuren HR, Corpechot C et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy and liver transplant-free survival in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2019;71:357–365.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.001
Lammers WJ, van Buuren HR, Hirschfield GM et al. Levels of alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin are surrogate end points of outcomes of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: an international follow-up study. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:1338-1349.e5.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.029
Itakura J, Izumi N, Nishimura Y et al. Prospective randomized crossover trial of combination therapy with bezafibrate and UDCA for primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatol Res. 2004;29:216–222.
doi: 10.1016/j.hepres.2004.04.001
Lens S, Leoz M, Nazal L et al. Bezafibrate normalizes alkaline phosphatase in primary biliary cirrhosis patients with incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Liver Int. 2014;34:197–203.
doi: 10.1111/liv.12290
Corpechot C, Chazouillères O, Rousseau A et al. A placebo-controlled trial of bezafibrate in primary biliary cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2171–2181.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714519
Nevens F, Andreone P, Mazzella G et al. A placebo-controlled trial of obeticholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:631–643.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509840
Trauner M, Nevens F, Shiffman ML et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of obeticholic acid for patients with primary biliary cholangitis: 3-year results of an international open-label extension study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4:445–453.
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30094-9
Tanaka A, Hirohara J, Nakano T et al. Association of bezafibrate with transplant-free survival in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2021;75:565–571.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.010
Lindor KD, Bowlus CL, Boyer J et al. Primary biliary cholangitis: 2018 Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2019;69:394–419.
Ludwig J, Dickson ER, McDonald GSA. Staging of chronic nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis (syndrome of primary biliary cirrhosis). Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1978;379:103–112.
doi: 10.1007/BF00432479
Parés A, Caballería L, Rodés J. Excellent long-term Survival in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:715–720.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.12.029
Corpechot C, Chazouillères O, Poupon R. Early primary biliary cirrhosis: Biochemical response to treatment and prediction of long-term outcome. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1361–1367.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.02.031
Kumagi T, Guindi M, Fischer SE et al. Baseline Ductopenia and treatment response predict long-term histological progression in primary biliary cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2186–2194.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.216
Haynes R. Determinants of compliance: The disease and the mechanics of treatment. Compliance in health care. 1979.
Cançado GGL, Braga MH, Ferraz MLG et al. Clinical features and treatment outcomes of primary biliary cholangitis in a highly admixed population. Ann Hepatol. 2022;27:100546.
doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2021.100546
Carey EJ, Ali AH, Lindor KD. Primary biliary cirrhosis. Lancet (London, England). 2015;386:1565–1575.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00154-3
Corpechot C, Carrat F, Bahr A et al. The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on the natural course of primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:297–303.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.009
Lammert C, Juran BD, Schlicht E et al. Biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid predicts survival in a North American cohort of primary biliary cirrhosis patients. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1414–1420.
doi: 10.1007/s00535-013-0903-1
Angulo P, Lindor KD, Therneau TM et al. Utilization of the Mayo risk score in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid. Liver. 1999;19:115–121.
doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.1999.tb00020.x
Perez CFM, Harms MH, Lindor KD et al. Goals of treatment for improved survival in primary biliary cholangitis: treatment target should be bilirubin within the normal range and normalization of alkaline phosphatase. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:1066–1074.
doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000557

Auteurs

Guilherme Grossi Lopes Cançado (GGL)

Instituto Alfa de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Professor Alfredo Balena 110, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130-100, Brazil. guilhermegrossi@terra.com.br.
Hospital da Polícia Militar de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. guilhermegrossi@terra.com.br.

Cláudia Alves Couto (CA)

Instituto Alfa de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Professor Alfredo Balena 110, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130-100, Brazil.

Debora Raquel Benedita Terrabuio (DRB)

Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Eduardo Luiz Rachid Cançado (ELR)

Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Cristiane Alves Villela-Nogueira (CA)

Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho e Departamento de Clínica Médica da Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Maria Lucia Gomes Ferraz (MLG)

Disciplina de Gastroenterologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Michelle Harriz Braga (MH)

Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Mateus Jorge Nardelli (MJ)

Instituto Alfa de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Professor Alfredo Balena 110, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130-100, Brazil.

Luciana Costa Faria (LC)

Instituto Alfa de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Professor Alfredo Balena 110, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130-100, Brazil.

Nathalia Mota de Faria Gomes (NM)

Disciplina de Gastroenterologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Elze Maria Gomes Oliveira (EMG)

Centro Universitário Lusíada - UNILUS, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Vivian Rotman (V)

Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho e Departamento de Clínica Médica da Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Maria Beatriz Oliveira (MB)

Ambulatório Municipal de Hepatites Virais de São José dos Campos, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Simone Muniz Carvalho Fernandes da Cunha (SMCF)

Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Marlone Cunha-Silva (M)

Divisão de Gastroenterologia (Gastrocentro), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Liliana Sampaio Costa Mendes (LSC)

Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.

Claudia Alexandra Pontes Ivantes (CAP)

Serviço de Gastroenterologia, Hepatologia e Transplante Hepático, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Liana Codes (L)

Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Hospital Português, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Valéria Ferreira de Almeida E Borges (VF)

Instituto de Gastroenterologia, Endoscopia e Proctologia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Fabio Heleno de Lima Pace (FH)

Serviço de Gastroenterologia e Hepatologia, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Mario Guimarães Pessoa (MG)

Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Laura Vilar Guedes (LV)

Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Izabelle Venturini Signorelli (IV)

Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio Moraes, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Gabriela Perdomo Coral (GP)

Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Cynthia Levy (C)

Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Paulo Lisboa Bittencourt (PL)

Hospital Português, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH