Social determinants of depression among mid-to-older aged Australians: A prospective study of the effects of neighbourhood disadvantage and crime.
Crime
Depression
Mental Health, Social Determinants of Health
Neighbourhood disadvantage
Journal
SSM - population health
ISSN: 2352-8273
Titre abrégé: SSM Popul Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101678841
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
05
05
2022
revised:
14
07
2022
accepted:
23
07
2022
entrez:
22
8
2022
pubmed:
23
8
2022
medline:
23
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Few studies examining social determinants of depression have incorporated area level objectively measured crime combined with self-report measures of perceived crime. How these factors may interrelate with neighbourhood disadvantage is not well understood, particularly in Australia, where mental health disorders are of major concern. This study examined relationships between area-level objective crime, self-reported perceptions of crime, neighbourhood disadvantage and depression, and potential mechanisms by which these variables indirectly lead to depression. This study used data from the HABITAT Project, a representative longitudinal study of persons aged 40-65 years residing in 200 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia, during 2007-2016. A prospective sample of residentially stable persons who reported depression at two years (n =3120) and five years (n=2249) post-follow-up was developed. Area level objective crimes were categorised as either crimes against the person, social incivilities or unlawful entry. Logistic regression was used to establish relationships with depression, followed by a decomposition analysis to establish potential mechanisms. Neighbourhoods in the highest quartile of crimes against the person had an increased risk of individuals reporting depression at all periods of follow-up. Associations were also found between unlawful entry and depression. Decomposition analysis indicated a positive and significant total effect of crime against the person on depression for all periods of follow-up, while an indirect effect of perceived crime was found to partially explain this relationship at 2-years after baseline (prop. Mediated = 46.5%), and at either or both periods of follow-up (prop. Mediated = 53.7%), but not at 5-years follow-up. Neighbourhoods with the highest levels of crime against the person may influence depression over time through a pathway of perceived crime. Perceived crime, particularly in areas of high crime against the person should be considered as part of a multi-faceted strategy aimed at improving population mental health.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Few studies examining social determinants of depression have incorporated area level objectively measured crime combined with self-report measures of perceived crime. How these factors may interrelate with neighbourhood disadvantage is not well understood, particularly in Australia, where mental health disorders are of major concern. This study examined relationships between area-level objective crime, self-reported perceptions of crime, neighbourhood disadvantage and depression, and potential mechanisms by which these variables indirectly lead to depression.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This study used data from the HABITAT Project, a representative longitudinal study of persons aged 40-65 years residing in 200 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia, during 2007-2016. A prospective sample of residentially stable persons who reported depression at two years (n =3120) and five years (n=2249) post-follow-up was developed. Area level objective crimes were categorised as either crimes against the person, social incivilities or unlawful entry. Logistic regression was used to establish relationships with depression, followed by a decomposition analysis to establish potential mechanisms.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Neighbourhoods in the highest quartile of crimes against the person had an increased risk of individuals reporting depression at all periods of follow-up. Associations were also found between unlawful entry and depression. Decomposition analysis indicated a positive and significant total effect of crime against the person on depression for all periods of follow-up, while an indirect effect of perceived crime was found to partially explain this relationship at 2-years after baseline (prop. Mediated = 46.5%), and at either or both periods of follow-up (prop. Mediated = 53.7%), but not at 5-years follow-up.
Discussion
UNASSIGNED
Neighbourhoods with the highest levels of crime against the person may influence depression over time through a pathway of perceived crime. Perceived crime, particularly in areas of high crime against the person should be considered as part of a multi-faceted strategy aimed at improving population mental health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35990410
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101190
pii: S2352-8273(22)00169-0
pmc: PMC9385683
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101190Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006 Aug;15(4):188-192
pubmed: 18185846
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;168:30-34
pubmed: 27639049
BMC Public Health. 2009 Mar 05;9:76
pubmed: 19265552
BMC Public Health. 2011 Dec 14;11:930
pubmed: 22168151
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(1):79-88
pubmed: 28329804
Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;20(3):171-81
pubmed: 20159488
Health Place. 2012 Jul;18(4):757-65
pubmed: 22542441
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Apr;54(3):252-258
pubmed: 28861664
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Jun 09;6:32
pubmed: 19508724
Soc Sci Med. 2013 May;85:43-9
pubmed: 23540365
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;49(6):873-87
pubmed: 24414031
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 12;8(1):2861
pubmed: 29434331
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Sep;38(9):1682-91
pubmed: 16960531
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;282:114106
pubmed: 34139480
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e198209
pubmed: 31348510
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Aug;8(6):829-40
pubmed: 21832299
Prev Med. 2017 Feb;95 Suppl:S68-S74
pubmed: 27939263
Am J Community Psychol. 2018 Jun;61(3-4):285-295
pubmed: 29512822
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;97:87-94
pubmed: 24161093
Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;55(10):622-32
pubmed: 20964941
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Aug;30(8):1153-1176
pubmed: 29223174
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;54(10):1177-1187
pubmed: 31054019
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;215(2):468-475
pubmed: 31057126
Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Winter;21(1):227-59
pubmed: 19144232
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;64(1):92-103
pubmed: 29212385
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jul 10;17(1):91
pubmed: 32650787
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Nov;48(11):2141-2151
pubmed: 31641926
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Aug 09;12:641-650
pubmed: 31496848
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105764
pubmed: 31269417
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 9;50(3):730-731h
pubmed: 33247900
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jul;67(1):23-30
pubmed: 18396366
Science. 1997 Aug 15;277(5328):918-24
pubmed: 9252316
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Apr;18(3):215-8
pubmed: 10722987
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Sep;64(1-2):218-230
pubmed: 31087369
Cad Saude Publica. 2019;35(1):e00197017
pubmed: 30652824
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Aug 1;162(3):253-60
pubmed: 15987730
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Aug;74(8):631-638
pubmed: 32332115
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Nov;62(11):940-6, 8 p following 946
pubmed: 18775943
Behav Sci Law. 2019 Nov;37(6):650-664
pubmed: 31975443
Stata J. 2010 Winter;10(1):11-29
pubmed: 22468140
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):12
pubmed: 33413249
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Oct;74(10):806-814
pubmed: 32503890
Health Place. 2017 Jan;43:138-143
pubmed: 28049071
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;50(11):1641-56
pubmed: 26164028
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Apr;72(4):294-301
pubmed: 29367280