Quality assurance and quality control in surgical oncology.
cancer care
quality assessment
quality improvement
quality indicator
Journal
Journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1096-9098
Titre abrégé: J Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0222643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
28
07
2022
accepted:
10
08
2022
pubmed:
23
8
2022
medline:
15
11
2022
entrez:
22
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Even though surgery has remained a key component within multi-disciplinary cancer care, the expectations have changed. Instead of serving as a modality to free a patient of a mass at all means and at the risk of high morbidity, modern cancer surgery is expected to provide adequate tumor clearance with lowest invasiveness. This review summarizes the evidence on quality assurance in surgical oncology and gives a comprehensive overview of quality improvement tools.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1560-1572Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Ariel IM. Breast cancer, a historic review: is the past prologue? In: Ariel IM, Cleary JB, eds. Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. McGraw-Hill; 1987:3-26.
Lawrence W. Jr. History of surgical oncology. In: Norton JA, ed. Surgery. Springer; 2008:1889-1900.
Fromberg R. Monitoring and evaluation in patient care services. In: Chicago: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 1988:76.
Clavien PA. Targeting quality in surgery. Ann Surg. 2013;258:659-668.
Cleary PD. A hospitalization from hell: a patient's perspective on quality. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:33-39.
Gregory D, Way C, Barrett B, Parfrey P. Health care quality from the perspective of health care providers and patients during and shortly after acute care restructuring in Newfoundland and Labrador. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(Suppl 2):S48-S57.
Baker A. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press; 2001.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(Suppl):S166-S206.
Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:523-530.
Douek M, Taylor I. Good practice and quality assurance in surgical oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4(10):626-630.
Wiegering A, Buhr HJ, Klinger C, et al. Quality indicators for surgery of rectal cancer: evidence-based development of a set of indicators for quality. Chirurg. 2018;89(1):26-31.
S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom, Langversion 2.1, 2019, AWMF Registernummer: 021/007OL. Accessed June 14, 2022. https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/kolorektales-karzinom/
Aloia TA, Zimmitti G, Conrad C, Gottumukalla V, Kopetz S, Vauthey JN. Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT): a novel metric for evaluating the quality of oncosurgical therapy for malignancy. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:107-114.
Merkow RP, Hall BL, Cohen ME, et al. Validity and feasibility of the American College of Surgeons colectomy composite outcome quality measure. Ann Surg. 2013;257:483-489.
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie: S3-Leitlinie Exokrines Pankreaskarzinom, Langversion 1.0, 2013, AWMF Registernummer: 032-010OL. Accessed June 14, 2022. https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien.7.0.html
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie: S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus, Langversion 2.0, 2018, AWMF Registernummer: 021-023OL. Accessed June 14, 2022. https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/oesophaguskarzinom
Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: esophagectomy complications consensus group (ECCG). Ann Surg. 2015;262:286-294.
Biganzoli L, Marotti L, Hart CD, et al. Quality indicators in breast cancer care: an update from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2017;86:59-81.
Del Turco MR, Ponti A, Bick U, et al. Quality indicators in breast cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:2344-2356.
Kolfschoten NE, Kievit J, Gooiker GA, et al. Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; hospital variations in ‘textbook outcome’. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:156-163.
Busweiler LA, Schouwenburg MG, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2017;104:742-750.
Aquina CT, Hamad A, Becerra AZ, et al. Is textbook oncologic outcome a valid hospital-quality metric after high-risk surgical oncology procedures? Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:8028-8045.
den Dulk M, van de Velde CJ. Quality assurance in surgical oncology: the tale of the Dutch rectal cancer TME trial. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:5-7.
Gunnarsson U. Quality assurance in surgical oncology. Colorectal cancer as an example. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:89-94.
ISO 9000:2015(en) Quality Management Systems-Fundamentals and Vocabulary. 2015. Accessed June 14, 2022. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9000:ed-4:v1:en:term:3.3.6
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) - sixth edition. 2017.
ISO 9000:2015(en) Quality Management Systems-Fundamentals and Vocabulary. 2015. Accessed June 14, 2022. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9000:ed-4:v1:en:term:3.3.7
Liu JY, Merkow RP, Cohen ME, et al. Association of weekend effect with recovery after surgery. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:988-990.
Smith SA, Yamamoto JM, Roberts DJ, et al. Weekend surgical care and postoperative mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Med Care. 2018;56:121-129.
Landheer ML, Therasse P, van de Velde CJ. Quality assurance in surgical oncology (QASO) within the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): current status and future prospects. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:1450-1462.
Byrne BE, Mamidanna R, Vincent CA, Faiz O. Population-based cohort study comparing 30- and 90-day institutional mortality rates after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1810-1817.
Swanson RS, Pezzi CM, Mallin K, Loomis AM, Winchester DP. The 90-day mortality after pancreatectomy for cancer is double the 30-day mortality: more than 20,000 resections from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4059-4067.
Talsma AK, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, Wijnhoven BP, Van Lanschot JJ. The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care. Ann Surg. 2014;260:267-273.
In H, Palis BE, Merkow RP, et al. Doubling of 30-day mortality by 90 days after esophagectomy: a critical measure of outcomes for quality improvement. Ann Surg. 2016;263:286-291.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-213.
Clavien PA, Vetter D, Staiger RD, et al. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI(R)): added value and clinical perspectives 3 years “down the line”. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1045-1050.
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8-13.
Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:339-351.
Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011;149:680-688.
Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149:713-724.
Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB. 2011;13:528-535.
Gerken ALH, Herrle F, Jakob J, et al. Definition and severity grading of postoperative lymphatic leakage following inguinal lymph node dissection. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020;405:697-704.
Shulman LN, Browner AE, Palis BE, et al. Compliance with cancer quality measures over time and their association with survival outcomes: the commission on cancer's experience with the quality measure requiring at least 12 regional lymph nodes to be removed and analyzed with colon cancer resections. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:1613-1621.
Dudash MJ, Slipak S, Dove J, et al. Lymph node harvest as a measure of quality and effect on overall survival in esophageal cancer: a National Cancer Database assessment. Am Surg. 2019;85:201-205.
Morgan JW, Ji L, Friedman G, Senthil M, Dyke C, Lum SS. The role of the cancer center when using lymph node count as a quality measure for gastric cancer surgery. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:37-43.
Huang L, Jansen L, Balavarca Y, et al. Significance of examined lymph node number in accurate staging and long-term survival in resected stage I-II pancreatic cancer-more is better? A large international population-based cohort study. Ann Surg. 2021;274(6):e554-e563.
DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:438-451.
Edge SB. Quality measurement in breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:509-517.
Dimick JB, Staiger DO, Hall BL, Ko CY, Birkmeyer JD. Composite measures for profiling hospitals on surgical morbidity. Ann Surg. 2013;257:67-72.
Gooiker GA, Kolfschoten NE, Bastiaannet E, et al. Evaluating the validity of quality indicators for colorectal cancer care. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:465-471.
Hardt J, Buhr HJ, Klinger C, et al. Quality indicators for colon cancer surgery: evidence-based development of a set of indicators for the outcome quality. Chirurg. 2018;89:17-25.
Brajcich BC, Merkow RP, Textbook A. Answer to the debate about Medicare's prospective payment system exemption? Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:1730-1732.
Shulman LN, Palis BE, McCabe R, et al. Survival as a quality metric of cancer care: use of the National Cancer Data Base to assess hospital performance. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14:e59-e72.
Kelz RR. Surgical Quality Improvement. Springer; 2017.
EORTC. Accessed June 14, 2022. https://qol.eortc.org/questionnaires/
Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA. 2000;284:3028-3035.
Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747-1751.
Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;228:429-438.
Swisher SG, Deford L, Merriman KW, et al. Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:1126-1132.
Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, Sharp SM, Warshaw AL, Fisher ES. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 1999;125:250-256.
Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Moran B, Heald R, Cedermark B. Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet. 2000;356:93-96.
Landheer ML, Therasse P, van de Velde CJ. The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002;28:571-602.
Schmidt HM, Gisbertz SS, Moons J, et al. Defining benchmarks for transthoracic esophagectomy: a multicenter analysis of total minimally invasive esophagectomy in low risk patients. Ann Surg. 2017;266:814-821.
Ettorchi-Tardy A, Levif M, Michel P. Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in health. Healthc Policy. 2012;7:e101-e119.
Sánchez-Velázquez P, Muller X, Malleo G, et al. Benchmarks in pancreatic surgery: a novel tool for unbiased outcome comparisons. Ann Surg. 2019;270:211-218.
Accessed June 14, 2022. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip
Braxton CC. Defining, measuring, and improving surgical quality: beyond teamwork and checklists to systems redesign and transformation. Surg Infect. 2012;13:312-316.
Wong SL. The state of quality indicators in surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:7-8.
Landercasper J, Bailey L, Buras R, et al. The American Society of Breast Surgeons and Quality Payment Programs: ranking, defining, and benchmarking more than 1 million patient quality measure encounters. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3093-3106.
Landercasper J, Fayanju OM, Bailey L, et al. Benchmarking the American Society of Breast Surgeon member performance for more than a million quality measure-patient encounters. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:501-511.
Quality assurance in surgical oncology the EURECCA platform. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:1387-1390.
Accessed June 14, 2022. https://healthcare-quality.jrc.ec.europa.eu/discover-ecibc/rationale
Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ko CY. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250:363-376.
Cohen ME, Liu Y, Ko CY, Hall BL. Improved surgical outcomes for ACS NSQIP hospitals over time: evaluation of hospital cohorts with up to 8 years of participation. Ann Surg. 2016;263:267-273.
Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, et al. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the patient safety in surgery study. Ann Surg. 2008;248:329-336.