Measuring the longitudinal course of voice hearing under psychological interventions: A systematic review.
Auditory verbal hallucinations
Longitudinal course
Psychological interventions
Voice hearing
Journal
Clinical psychology review
ISSN: 1873-7811
Titre abrégé: Clin Psychol Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8111117
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
23
11
2021
revised:
10
06
2022
accepted:
04
08
2022
pubmed:
23
8
2022
medline:
14
10
2022
entrez:
22
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Trials of psychological interventions targeting distressing voices have used a range of variables to measure outcomes. This has complicated attempts to compare outcomes across trials and to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Therefore, this review aimed to identify the variables that have been used to measure the longitudinal course and impact of voice hearing under these interventions and to evaluate how these variables change over time. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in a total of 66 articles. Of these, 60 studies (28 RCTs, 23 uncontrolled, 9 non-randomised) were published in peer-reviewed journals, whilst 6 were recently completed or currently ongoing. The findings of this review suggest that a range of variables that are not directly relevant to psychological interventions have been used (e.g., depression, characteristics of voice hearing experience), whilst those directly impacted by psychological interventions (e.g., voice-related distress), broader concepts of outcome (e.g., functioning) and specific associated processes (e.g., self-schema) have received less attention. Findings also showed that the majority of variables demonstrated improvements, but effect sizes varied considerably across trials. This may be attributed to methodological differences such as statistical power, blinding, control groups and different methods of measurement. Our review highlights the importance of determining a set of outcomes that are directly targeted and should change under psychological interventions. Recommendations include the use of voice-related distress as a primary outcome. This can ultimately facilitate comparisons across studies and inform the development of psychological interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35995024
pii: S0272-7358(22)00076-9
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102191
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102191Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.