Measuring the longitudinal course of voice hearing under psychological interventions: A systematic review.

Auditory verbal hallucinations Longitudinal course Psychological interventions Voice hearing

Journal

Clinical psychology review
ISSN: 1873-7811
Titre abrégé: Clin Psychol Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8111117

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
received: 23 11 2021
revised: 10 06 2022
accepted: 04 08 2022
pubmed: 23 8 2022
medline: 14 10 2022
entrez: 22 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Trials of psychological interventions targeting distressing voices have used a range of variables to measure outcomes. This has complicated attempts to compare outcomes across trials and to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Therefore, this review aimed to identify the variables that have been used to measure the longitudinal course and impact of voice hearing under these interventions and to evaluate how these variables change over time. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in a total of 66 articles. Of these, 60 studies (28 RCTs, 23 uncontrolled, 9 non-randomised) were published in peer-reviewed journals, whilst 6 were recently completed or currently ongoing. The findings of this review suggest that a range of variables that are not directly relevant to psychological interventions have been used (e.g., depression, characteristics of voice hearing experience), whilst those directly impacted by psychological interventions (e.g., voice-related distress), broader concepts of outcome (e.g., functioning) and specific associated processes (e.g., self-schema) have received less attention. Findings also showed that the majority of variables demonstrated improvements, but effect sizes varied considerably across trials. This may be attributed to methodological differences such as statistical power, blinding, control groups and different methods of measurement. Our review highlights the importance of determining a set of outcomes that are directly targeted and should change under psychological interventions. Recommendations include the use of voice-related distress as a primary outcome. This can ultimately facilitate comparisons across studies and inform the development of psychological interventions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35995024
pii: S0272-7358(22)00076-9
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102191
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102191

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Sofia Loizou (S)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK. Electronic address: s.loizou@sussex.ac.uk.

David Fowler (D)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK.

Mark Hayward (M)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK; Research & Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Nevill Avenue, Hove BN7 3HZ, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH