Generalized propensity score approach to causal inference with spatial interference.

air pollution causal inference interference spatial process wildfire

Journal

Biometrics
ISSN: 1541-0420
Titre abrégé: Biometrics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370625

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2023
Historique:
received: 22 11 2020
accepted: 09 08 2022
medline: 13 9 2023
pubmed: 24 8 2022
entrez: 23 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Many spatial phenomena exhibit interference, where exposures at one location may affect the response at other locations. Because interference violates the stable unit treatment value assumption, standard methods for causal inference do not apply. We propose a new causal framework to recover direct and spill-over effects in the presence of spatial interference, taking into account that exposures at nearby locations are more influential than exposures at locations further apart. Under the no unmeasured confounding assumption, we show that a generalized propensity score is sufficient to remove all measured confounding. To reduce dimensionality issues, we propose a Bayesian spline-based regression model accounting for a sufficient set of variables for the generalized propensity score. A simulation study demonstrates the accuracy and coverage properties. We apply the method to estimate the causal effect of wildland fires on air pollution in the Western United States over 2005-2018.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35996756
doi: 10.1111/biom.13745
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2220-2231

Subventions

Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R01 ES031651
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Biometrics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Biometric Society.

Références

Aronow, P.M. & Samii, C. (2017) Estimating average causal effects under general interference, with application to a social network experiment. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 11(4), 1912-1947.
Athey, S., Eckles, D. & Imbens, G.W. (2018) Exact p-values for network interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(521), 230-240.
Bia, M., Flores, C.A., Flores-Lagunes, A. & Mattei, A. (2014) A stata package for the application of semiparametric estimators of dose-response functions. The Stata Journal, 14(3), 580-604.
Bind, M.-A. (2019) Causal modeling in environmental health. Annual Review of Public Health, 40, 23-43.
Brook, R.D. (2007) Is air pollution a cause of cardiovascular disease? Updated review and controversies. Reviews on Environmental Health, 22(2), 115-138.
Corrigan, A.E., Becker, M.M., Neas, L.M., Cascio, W.E. & Rappold, A.G. (2018) Fine particulate matters: the impact of air quality standards on cardiovascular mortality. Environmental Research, 161, 364-369.
Cox, D.R. (1958) Planning of experiments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Dominici, F., Peng, R.D., Bell, M.L., Pham, L., McDermott, A., Zeger, S.L., & Samet, J.M. (2006) Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. JAMA, 295(10), 1127-1134.
Eilers, P.H. & Marx, B.D. (1996) Flexible smoothing with b-splines and penalties. Statistical Science, 89-102.
Environmental Protection Agency (2019) Air Quality Index, Pre-Generated Data Files: Daily Summary Data - Particulates: PM2.5 FRM/FEM Mass (88101). https://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/download_files.html [Accessed 2019].
Forastiere, L., Airoldi, E.M. & Mealli, F. (2020) Identification and estimation of treatment and interference effects in observational studies on networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116, 1-18.
Forastiere, L., Mealli, F., Wu, A. & Airoldi, E. (2018) Estimating causal effects under interference using Bayesian generalized propensity scores. Preprint, arXiv:1807.11038.
Geospatial Multi-Agency Coordination (2019) Historic Fire Data. https://rmgsc.cr.usgs.gov/outgoing/GeoMAC/historic_fire_data [Accessed 2019].
Giffin, A. (2021) Wildfire data for generalized propensity score approach to causal inference with spatial interference. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/11GSTG.
Halloran, M.E. & Struchiner, C.J. (1991) Study designs for dependent happenings. Epidemiology, 331-338.
Halloran, M.E. & Struchiner, C.J. (1995) Causal inference in infectious diseases. Epidemiology, 6(2), 142-151.
Hirano, K. & Imbens, G.W. (2004) The propensity score with continuous treatments. Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives, 226164, 73-84.
Hudgens, M.G. & Halloran, M.E. (2008) Toward causal inference with interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(482), 832-842.
Imai, K. & Van Dyk, D.A. (2004) Causal inference with general treatment regimes: generalizing the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99(467), 854-866.
Imbens, G.W. (2000) The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika, 87(3), 706-710.
Karwa, V. & Airoldi, E.M. (2018) A systematic investigation of classical causal inference strategies under mis-specification due to network interference. Preprint, arXiv:1810.08259.
Kluve, J., Schneider, H., Uhlendorff, A. & Zhao, Z. (2012) Evaluating continuous training programmes by using the generalized propensity score. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 175(2), 587-617.
Larsen, A.E., Reich, B.J., Ruminski, M. & Rappold, A.G. (2018) Impacts of fire smoke plumes on regional air quality, 2006-2013. Journal of Exposure science & Environmental Epidemiology, 28(4), 319.
Lechner, M. (2001) Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption. In: Lechner, M., & Pfeiffer, F. (eds.) Econometric evaluation of labour market policies. Berlin: Springer, pp. 43-58.
Liu, L. & Hudgens, M.G. (2014) Large sample randomization inference of causal effects in the presence of interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 109(505), 288-301.
Manski, C.F. (2013) Identification of treatment response with social interactions. The Econometrics Journal, 16(1), S1-S23.
McCandless, L.C., Douglas, I.J., Evans, S.J. & Smeeth, L. (2010) Cutting feedback in Bayesian regression adjustment for the propensity score. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 6(2).
National Interagency Fire Center (2020) Wildfire Open Data - Historical GeoMAC fire perimeter datasets. https://data-nifc.opendata.arcgis.com/search?q=geomac [Accessed 2020].
Ngo, L. & Wand, M.P. (2004) Smoothing with mixed model software. Journal of Statistical Software, 9. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v009.i01
Nychka, D., Furrer, R. & Sain, S. (2014) fields: tools for spatial data. r package version 7.1.
Papadogeorgou, G., Choirat, C. & Zigler, C.M. (2018) Adjusting for unmeasured spatial confounding with distance adjusted propensity score matching. Biostatistics, 20(2), 256-272.
Papadogeorgou, G. & Dominici, F. (2020) A causal exposure response function with local adjustment for confounding: estimating health effects of exposure to low levels of ambient fine particulate matter. Annals of Applied Statistics, 14(2), 850-871.
Papadogeorgou, G., Mealli, F. & Zigler, C.M. (2019) Causal inference with interfering units for cluster and population level treatment allocation programs. Biometrics, 75(3), 778-787.
Perez-Heydrich, C., Hudgens, M.G., Halloran, M.E., Clemens, J.D., Ali, M., & Emch, M.E. (2014) Assessing effects of cholera vaccination in the presence of interference. Biometrics, 70(3), 731-741.
R Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rappold, A.G., Cascio, W.E., Kilaru, V.J., Stone, S.L., Neas, L.M., Devlin, R.B. & Diaz-Sanchez, D. (2012) Cardio-respiratory outcomes associated with exposure to wildfire smoke are modified by measures of community health. Environmental Health, 11(1), 71.
Rosenbaum, P.R. & Rubin, D.B. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
Rubin, D.B. (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688.
Rubin, D.B. (1980) Randomization analysis of experimental data: the Fisher randomization test comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75(371), 591-593.
Saarela, O., Belzile, L.R. & Stephens, D.A. (2016) A Bayesian view of doubly robust causal inference. Biometrika, 103(3), 667-681.
Saarela, O., Stephens, D.A., Moodie, E.E. & Klein, M.B. (2015) On Bayesian estimation of marginal structural models. Biometrics, 71(2), 279-288.
Schnell, P.M. & Papadogeorgou, G. (2020) Mitigating unobserved spatial confounding when estimating the effect of supermarket access on cardiovascular disease deaths. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 14(4), 2069-2095.
Sobel, M.E. (2006) What do randomized studies of housing mobility demonstrate? Causal inference in the face of interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(476), 1398-1407.
Tchetgen, E.J.T. & VanderWeele, T.J. (2012) On causal inference in the presence of interference. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 21(1), 55-75.
Verbitsky-Savitz, N. & Raudenbush, S.W. (2012) Causal inference under interference in spatial settings: a case study evaluating community policing program in chicago. Epidemiologic Methods, 1(1), 107-130.
Weber, S.A., Insaf, T.Z., Hall, E.S., Talbot, T.O. & Huff, A.K. (2016) Assessing the impact of fine particulate matter (PM2. 5) on respiratory-cardiovascular chronic diseases in the New York City Metropolitan area using Hierarchical Bayesian Model estimates. Environmental Research, 151, 399-409.
Wildland Fire Assessment System (2019) WFAS Archive. www.fs.fed.us/land/wfas/archive [Accessed 2019].
Wood, S.N. (2006) Low-rank scale-invariant tensor product smooths for generalized additive mixed models. Biometrics, 62(4), 1025-1036.
Zigler, C.M. (2016) The central role of Bayes' theorem for joint estimation of causal effects and propensity scores. The American Statistician, 70(1), 47-54.
Zigler, C.M., Dominici, F. & Wang, Y. (2012) Estimating causal effects of air quality regulations using principal stratification for spatially correlated multivariate intermediate outcomes. Biostatistics, 13(2), 289-302.
Zigler, C.M. & Papadogeorgou, G. (2021) Bipartite causal inference with interference. Statistical Science: A Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 36(1), 109.
Zigler, C.M., Watts, K., Yeh, R.W., Wang, Y., Coull, B.A. & Dominici, F. (2013) Model feedback in Bayesian propensity score estimation. Biometrics, 69(1), 263-273.

Auteurs

A Giffin (A)

Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

B J Reich (BJ)

Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

S Yang (S)

Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

A G Rappold (AG)

Environmental Protection Agency, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
Humans Emergency Service, Hospital Child Child, Preschool Infant
Humans Mobile Applications Hepatitis C Male Female

How Certification Exams Reflect Current Practice.

Tara L Myers, Sean DeGarmo, Marianne Horahan
1.00
Humans Certification Clinical Competence Education, Nursing, Continuing Adult

Classifications MeSH