The usefulness of His bundle pacing in a heterogeneous population of patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function.

His bundle pacing heart failure permanent pacing resynchronization therapy

Journal

Cardiology journal
ISSN: 1898-018X
Titre abrégé: Cardiol J
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101392712

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 12 06 2022
accepted: 07 08 2022
revised: 06 08 2022
entrez: 23 8 2022
pubmed: 24 8 2022
medline: 24 8 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

His bundle pacing (HBP) maintains a physiological activation pattern of ventricular activation, and in patients with intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) it can normalize wide QRS duration. A total of 181 patients from the HBP registry were enrolled into a the study, which was conducted at the Department of Electrocardiology in Katowice, Poland. The patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% and were implanted between November 2015 and April 2019. The HBP indications were as follows: 1) bradycardia and atrioventricular conduction disturbances with expected high pacing burden, 2) IVCD, LVEF ≤ 35%, with an indication for resynchronization therapy, 3) the need to upgrade to resynchronization therapy due to pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Pacing parameters and echocardiographic and clinical data were assessed for up to 2 years of follow-up (FU). His bundle pacing was successful in 154 (85.1%) patients. Eighty-two patients completed a 6-month FU. The mean age was 70.6 ± 9.23 years, and 79% were males. At 6 months FU LVEF improved from 35.3 ± 8.22% to 43.1 ± 10.14% (p < 0.0001), and indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESVi) decreased from 63.1 ± 25.21 mL/m² to 51.9 ± 22.79 mL/m² (p < 0.0001). In 53.1%, the LVESVi reduction was greater than 15%. The improvement in LVEF and LVESVi was also observed after 24 months of FU. His bundle pacing in permanently paced patients when LVEF is reduced below 50% is associated with improvement in LVEF and reverse left ventricle remodeling.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
His bundle pacing (HBP) maintains a physiological activation pattern of ventricular activation, and in patients with intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) it can normalize wide QRS duration.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 181 patients from the HBP registry were enrolled into a the study, which was conducted at the Department of Electrocardiology in Katowice, Poland. The patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% and were implanted between November 2015 and April 2019. The HBP indications were as follows: 1) bradycardia and atrioventricular conduction disturbances with expected high pacing burden, 2) IVCD, LVEF ≤ 35%, with an indication for resynchronization therapy, 3) the need to upgrade to resynchronization therapy due to pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Pacing parameters and echocardiographic and clinical data were assessed for up to 2 years of follow-up (FU).
RESULTS RESULTS
His bundle pacing was successful in 154 (85.1%) patients. Eighty-two patients completed a 6-month FU. The mean age was 70.6 ± 9.23 years, and 79% were males. At 6 months FU LVEF improved from 35.3 ± 8.22% to 43.1 ± 10.14% (p < 0.0001), and indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESVi) decreased from 63.1 ± 25.21 mL/m² to 51.9 ± 22.79 mL/m² (p < 0.0001). In 53.1%, the LVESVi reduction was greater than 15%. The improvement in LVEF and LVESVi was also observed after 24 months of FU.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
His bundle pacing in permanently paced patients when LVEF is reduced below 50% is associated with improvement in LVEF and reverse left ventricle remodeling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35997047
pii: VM/OJS/J/90497
doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0079
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Rafal Gardas (R)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. rafal.gardas@gmail.com.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Center of the Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland. rafal.gardas@gmail.com.

Krzysztof S Golba (KS)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Center of the Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland.

Danuta Loboda (D)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Center of the Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland.

Jolanta Biernat (J)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Tomasz Soral (T)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Piotr Kulesza (P)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Mateusz Sajdok (M)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Kamil Zub (K)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Classifications MeSH