Deep learning-based segmentation in prostate radiation therapy using Monte Carlo simulated cone-beam computed tomography.
CBCT
Monte Carlo simulation
cancer
deep learning
prostate
segmentation
Journal
Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
revised:
28
07
2022
received:
07
02
2022
accepted:
05
08
2022
pubmed:
25
8
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
entrez:
24
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Segmenting organs in cone-beam CT (CBCT) images would allow to adapt the radiotherapy based on the organ deformations that may occur between treatment fractions. However, this is a difficult task because of the relative lack of contrast in CBCT images, leading to high inter-observer variability. Deformable image registration (DIR) and deep-learning based automatic segmentation approaches have shown interesting results for this task in the past years. However, they are either sensitive to large organ deformations, or require to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) from a database of delineated CBCT images, which is difficult to do without improvement of image quality. In this work, we propose an alternative approach: to train a CNN (using a deep learning-based segmentation tool called nnU-Net) from a database of artificial CBCT images simulated from planning CT, for which it is easier to obtain the organ contours. Pseudo-CBCT (pCBCT) images were simulated from readily available segmented planning CT images, using the GATE Monte Carlo simulation. CT reference delineations were copied onto the pCBCT, resulting in a database of segmented images used to train the neural network. The studied segmentation contours were: bladder, rectum, and prostate contours. We trained multiple nnU-Net models using different training: (1) segmented real CBCT, (2) pCBCT, (3) segmented real CT and tested on pseudo-CT (pCT) generated from CBCT with cycleGAN, and (4) a combination of (2) and (3). The evaluation was performed on different datasets of segmented CBCT or pCT by comparing predicted segmentations with reference ones thanks to Dice similarity score and Hausdorff distance. A qualitative evaluation was also performed to compare DIR-based and nnU-Net-based segmentations. Training with pCBCT was found to lead to comparable results to using real CBCT images. When evaluated on CBCT obtained from the same hospital as the CT images used in the simulation of the pCBCT, the model trained with pCBCT scored mean DSCs of 0.92 ± 0.05, 0.87 ± 0.02, and 0.85 ± 0.04 and mean Hausdorff distance 4.67 ± 3.01, 3.91 ± 0.98, and 5.00 ± 1.32 for the bladder, rectum, and prostate contours respectively, while the model trained with real CBCT scored mean DSCs of 0.91 ± 0.06, 0.83 ± 0.07, and 0.81 ± 0.05 and mean Hausdorff distance 5.62 ± 3.24, 6.43 ± 5.11, and 6.19 ± 1.14 for the bladder, rectum, and prostate contours, respectively. It was also found to outperform models using pCT or a combination of both, except for the prostate contour when tested on a dataset from a different hospital. Moreover, the resulting segmentations demonstrated a clinical acceptability, where 78% of bladder segmentations, 98% of rectum segmentations, and 93% of prostate segmentations required minor or no corrections, and for 76% of the patients, all structures of the patient required minor or no corrections. We proposed to use simulated CBCT images to train a nnU-Net segmentation model, avoiding the need to gather complex and time-consuming reference delineations on CBCT images.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6930-6944Subventions
Organisme : GENCI
Organisme : SIRIC LYriCAN
ID : INCa-INSERM-DGOS-12563
Organisme : LABEX
ID : ANR-11-LABX-0063
Organisme : Investissements d'Avenir
ID : ANR-11-IDEX-0007
Organisme : ANR
Organisme : ITMO Cancer AVIESAN
Informations de copyright
© 2022 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Nassef M, Simon A, Cazoulat G, et al. Quantification of dose uncertainties in cumulated dose estimation compared to planned dose in prostate IMRT. Radiother Oncol. 2016;119(1):129-136.
Gardner SJ, Wen NW, Kim J, et al. Contouring variability of human- and deformable-generated contours in radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:4429-4447.
Thor M, Petersen JBB, Bentzen L, Høyer M, Muren LP. Deformable image registration for contour propagation from CT to cone-beam CT scans in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Acta Oncol. 2011;50:918-925.
Acosta O, Dowling J, Drean G, Simon A, Crevoisier Rd, Haigron P. Multi-atlas-based segmentation of pelvic structures from CT scans for planning in prostate cancer radiotherapy. In: Suri AJ, ed. Abdomen and Thoracic Imaging. Springer; 2013:623-656.
Zambrano V, Furtado H, Fabri D, et al. Performance validation of deformable image registration in the pelvic region. J Radiat Res. 2013;54:i120-i128.
Woerner AJ, Choi M, Harkenrider MM, Roeske JC, Surucu M. Evaluation of deformable image registration-based contour propagation from planning CT to cone-beam CT. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017;16(6):801-810.
Meyer P, Noblet V, Mazzara C, Lallement A. Survey on deep learning for radiotherapy. Comput Biol Med. 2018;98:126-146.
Kazemifar S, Balagopal A, Nguyen D, et al. Segmentation of the prostate and organs at risk in male pelvic CT images using deep learning. Biomed Phys Eng Exp. 2018;4(5):055003.
Liang X, Morgan H, Nguyen D, Jiang S. Deep learning based CT-to-CBCT deformable image registration for autosegmentation in head and neck adaptive radiation therapy. arXiv:2102.00590; 2021.
Sun M, Star-Lack J. Improved scatter correction using adaptive scatter kernel superposition. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(22):6695.
Niu T, Sun M, Star-Lack J, Gao H, Fan Q, Zhu L. Shading correction for on-board cone-beam CT in radiation therapy using planning MDCT images. Med Phys. 2010;37(10):5395-5406.
Stankovic U, Ploeger LS, Herk vM, Sonke JJ. Optimal combination of anti-scatter grids and software correction for CBCT imaging. Med Phys. 2017;44(9):4437-4451.
Kida S, Kaji S, Nawa K, et al. Visual enhancement of cone-beam CT by use of CycleGAN. Med Phys. 2020;47(3):998-1010.
Sun H, Fan R, Li C, et al. Imaging study of pseudo-CT synthesized from cone-beam CT based on 3D CycleGAN in radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2021;11:603844-603844.
Zhao J, Chen Z, Wang J, et al. MV CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using a deep learning method for rectal cancer adaptive radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2021;11:1733.
Dai X, Lei Y, Wynne J, et al. Synthetic CT-aided multiorgan segmentation for CBCT-guided adaptive pancreatic radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2021;48(11):7063-7073.
Dahiya N, Alam SR, Zhang P, et al. Multitask 3D CBCT-to-CT translation and organs-at-risk segmentation using physics-based data augmentation. Med Phys. 2021;48(9):5130-5141.
Jiang J, Riyahi Alam S, Chen I, et al. Deep cross-modality (MR-CT) educed distillation learning for cone beam CT lung tumor segmentation. Med Phys. 2021;48(7):3702-3713.
Schreier J, Genghi A, Laaksonen H, Morgas T, Haas B. Clinical evaluation of a full-image deep segmentation algorithm for the male pelvis on cone-beam CT and CT. Radiother Oncol. 2020;145:1-6.
Boydev C, Pasquier D, Derraz F, Peyrodie L, Taleb-Ahmed A, Thiran JP. Automatic prostate segmentation in cone-beam computed tomography images using rigid registration. 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2013: 3993-3997.
Rigaud B, Simon A, Castelli J, et al. Deformable image registration for radiation therapy: Principle, methods, applications and evaluation. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(9):1225-1237.
Sarrut D, Bardiès M, Boussion N, et al. A review of the use and potential of the GATE Monte Carlo simulation code for radiation therapy and dosimetry applications. Med Phys. 2014;41(6):064301.
Sarrut D, Bała M, Bardiès M, et al. Advanced Monte Carlo simulations of emission tomography imaging systems with GATE. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66(10):10TR03.
Vilches-Freixas G, Létang J, Brousmiche S, et al. Technical note: Procedure for the calibration and validation of kilo-voltage cone-beam CT models. Med Phys. 2016;43(9):5199-5204.
Poludniowski G, Evans P, Hansen V, Webb S. An efficient Monte Carlo-based algorithm for scatter correction in keV cone-beam CT. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:3847-3864.
Zöllner C. Investigation of a projection scatter correction algorithm for x-ray cone beam computed tomography. Master thesis, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München; 2016.
Rit S, Oliva MV, Brousmiche S, Labarbe R, Sarrut D, Sharp GC. The Reconstruction Toolkit (RTK), an open-source cone-beam CT reconstruction toolkit based on the Insight Toolkit (ITK). J Phys: Conf Ser. 2014;489:012079.
Park YK, Sharp GC, Phillips J, Winey BA. Proton dose calculation on scatter-corrected CBCT image: Feasibility study for adaptive proton therapy. Med Phys. 2015;42(8):4449-4459.
Zhu JY, Park T, Isola P, Efros AA. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); 2017:2242-2251.
Eckl M, Hoppen L, Sarria G, et al. Evaluation of a cycle-generative adversarial network-based cone-beam CT to synthetic CT conversion algorithm for adaptive radiation therapy. Phys Med. 2020;80:308-316.
Spadea MF, Maspero M, Zaffino P, Seco J. Deep learning based synthetic-CT generation in radiotherapy and PET: A review. Med Phys. 2021;48(11):6537-6566.
Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, Petersen J, Maier-Hein KH. nnU-Net: A self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):203-211.
Isensee F, Petersen J, Klein A, et al. nnU-Net: Self-adapting framework for U-Net-based medical image segmentation. arXiv:1809.10486; 2018.
MedPy's Documentation. http://loli.github.io/medpy/
SciPy's Documentation. Accessed: February 4, 2021. https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/
Alam SR, Li T, Zhang P, Zhang SY, Nadeem S. Generalizable cone beam CT esophagus segmentation using physics-based data augmentation. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66(6):065008.