Real-time automatic detection of starch particles in ambient air.
Aerobiology
Airborne starch
Automatic monitoring
Dispersion modelling
Emission sources
Journal
Agricultural and forest meteorology
ISSN: 0168-1923
Titre abrégé: Agric For Meteorol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101622394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
20
09
2021
revised:
07
03
2022
accepted:
30
05
2022
entrez:
25
8
2022
pubmed:
26
8
2022
medline:
26
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Considerable amounts of starch granules can be present in the atmosphere from both natural and anthropogenic sources. The aim of this study is to investigate the variability and potential origin of starch granules in ambient air recorded at six cities situated in a region with dominantly agricultural land use. This is achieved by using a combination of laser spectroscopy bioaerosol measurements with 1 min temporal resolution, traditional volumetric Hirst type bioaerosol sampling and atmospheric modelling. The analysis of wind roses identified potential sources of airborne starch (i.e., cereal grain storage facilities) in the vicinity of all aerobiological stations analysed in this study. The analysis of the CALPUFF dispersion model confirmed that emission of dust from the location of storage towers situated about 2.5 km north of the aerobiological station in Novi Sad is a plausible source of high airborne concentrations of starch granules. This study is important for environmental health since it contributes body of knowledge about sources, emission, and dispersion of airborne starch, known to be involved in phenomena such as thunderstorm-triggered asthma. The presented approach integrates monitoring and modelling, and provides a roadmap for examining a variety of bioaerosols previously considered to be outside the scope of traditional aerobiological measurements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36003366
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109034
pii: S0168-1923(22)00223-4
pmc: PMC9391928
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
109034Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Clin Exp Allergy. 1993 May;23(5):354-9
pubmed: 8334534
Nahrung. 2002 Oct;46(5):341-4
pubmed: 12428450
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Jun;105(6 Pt 1):1140-5
pubmed: 10856148
J Asthma Allergy. 2019 May 06;12:101-108
pubmed: 31190900
Int J Biometeorol. 2016 Oct;60(10):1493-1500
pubmed: 26842368
Allergy. 1999 May;54(5):478-83
pubmed: 10380779
Clin Transl Allergy. 2018 Apr 04;8:9
pubmed: 29636895
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2019;37(4):215-234
pubmed: 31512547
Allergy. 2013 Jun;68(6):809-12
pubmed: 23647633
Fungal Biol. 2020 Mar - Apr;124(3-4):219-227
pubmed: 32220382
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012 Sep;109(3):208-214.e6
pubmed: 22920077
J Histochem Cytochem. 1994 Mar;42(3):427-31
pubmed: 8308259
Thorax. 1997 Aug;52(8):680-5
pubmed: 9337825
Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 Jan;15(1):8-16
pubmed: 24893805
Lancet. 1992 Mar 7;339(8793):569-72
pubmed: 1347092
Eur Respir J. 2003 Apr;21(4):646-51
pubmed: 12762351
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 10;10(1):e029069
pubmed: 31924628
Eur Respir J. 2008 Aug;32(2):452-9
pubmed: 18417513
Histochem J. 1994 May;26(5):392-401
pubmed: 8045780
Int J Biometeorol. 2018 Apr;62(4):655-668
pubmed: 29177798
Thorax. 2004 Apr;59(4):277-8
pubmed: 15047944
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 10;15(9):e0238808
pubmed: 32913356
Cytometry A. 2018 Feb;93(2):213-221
pubmed: 28976638
Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 May;151:112116
pubmed: 33727182
Rev Sci Instrum. 2013 Mar;84(3):033302
pubmed: 23556810
Am J Ind Med. 2010 Dec;53(12):1225-32
pubmed: 20862699
Plant Dis. 2011 Nov;95(11):1346-1357
pubmed: 30731790
Biophys Rev. 2020 Feb;12(1):105-122
pubmed: 31950343
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(3):241-9
pubmed: 26414680