Comparison of performance of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves.

PDF, probability density function PG, pressure gradient RSS, Reynolds shear stress TAV, transcatheter aortic valve TAVR VSS, viscous shear stress blood damage pressure recovery turbulence

Journal

JTCVS open
ISSN: 2666-2736
Titre abrégé: JTCVS Open
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101768541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 02 11 2021
revised: 20 03 2022
accepted: 12 04 2022
entrez: 25 8 2022
pubmed: 26 8 2022
medline: 26 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To evaluate the flow dynamics of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves pertaining to turbulence and pressure recovery. Transcatheter aortic valves are characterized by different designs that have different valve performance and outcomes. Assessment of transcatheter aortic valves was performed using self-expanding devices (26-mm Evolut [Medtronic], 23-mm Allegra [New Valve Technologies], and small Acurate neo [Boston Scientific]) and a balloon-expandable device (23-mm Sapien 3 [Edwards Lifesciences]). Particle image velocimetry assessed the flow downstream. A Millar catheter was used for pressure recovery calculation. Velocity, Reynolds shear stresses, viscous shear stress, and pressure gradients were calculated. The maximal velocity at peak systole obtained with the Evolut R, Sapien 3, Acurate neo, and Allegra was 2.12 ± 0.19 m/sec, 2.41 ± 0.06 m/sec, 2.99 ± 0.10 m/sec, and 2.45 ± 0.08 m/sec, respectively ( Flow dynamics downstream of different transcatheter aortic valves vary significantly depending on the valve type, despite not having a general trend depending on whether or not valves are self-expanding or balloon-expandable. Deployment design did not have an influence on flow dynamics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36004225
doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.04.015
pii: S2666-2736(22)00168-1
pmc: PMC9390782
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

128-139

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Author(s).

Références

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Feb 21;:
pubmed: 30905419
Lancet. 2017 Jun 17;389(10087):2383-2392
pubmed: 28330690
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):565-576.e2
pubmed: 31767355
Ann Biomed Eng. 2019 Apr;47(4):1116-1128
pubmed: 30710186
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;153(6):1303-1315.e1
pubmed: 28283233
Ann Biomed Eng. 2008 Feb;36(2):276-97
pubmed: 18049902
J Biomech. 2017 Jun 14;58:114-122
pubmed: 28511838
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Jun;34(6):E442-E447
pubmed: 35652707
EuroIntervention. 2014 Sep;10 Suppl U:U44-51
pubmed: 25256331
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;156(5):1837-1848
pubmed: 29961588
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6):
pubmed: 27301396
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 11;13(9):1071-1082
pubmed: 32305398
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Feb;157(2):540-549
pubmed: 29980299
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):135-145
pubmed: 30448122
Circulation. 2020 Jan 28;141(4):243-259
pubmed: 31736356
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun 28;33(1):1-9
pubmed: 33674829
Ann Biomed Eng. 1995 Jan-Feb;23(1):21-8
pubmed: 7762879
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Mar;3(3):296-304
pubmed: 20223428
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;99(1):195-197
pubmed: 33886155
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;154(1):32-43.e1
pubmed: 28433356
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Oct;32(10):E258-E260
pubmed: 32999097
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar;12(3):e007739
pubmed: 30841710
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 8;12(13):1229-1237
pubmed: 31272669
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Mar;21(3):271-276
pubmed: 31281093
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007349
pubmed: 30732472
Adv Healthc Mater. 2021 Aug;10(15):e2100115
pubmed: 34038627
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jul;106(1):70-78
pubmed: 29501642
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;8(8):e001945
pubmed: 26206850
Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Feb;48(2):860-867
pubmed: 31792706
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15;64(2):158-68
pubmed: 25011720
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2009 Feb;36(2):225-37
pubmed: 19220329
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jun;3(6):555-62
pubmed: 20541709
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2285-2294
pubmed: 26610876
Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1467-75
pubmed: 2401075
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul;12(7):e007973
pubmed: 31272227

Auteurs

Hoda Hatoum (H)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Mich.
Health Research Institute, Center of Biocomputing and Digital Health and Institute of Computing and Cybernetics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Mich.

Milad Samaee (M)

Biomedical Engineering Department, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.

Janarthanan Sathananthan (J)

Center for Cardiovascular Innovation, Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Stephanie Sellers (S)

Center for Cardiovascular Innovation, Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Maximilian Kuetting (M)

New Valve Technology, Hechingen, Germany.

Scott M Lilly (SM)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Abdul R Ihdayhid (AR)

Fiona Stanley Hospital, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Philipp Blanke (P)

Department of Radiology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Jonathon Leipsic (J)

Department of Radiology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Vinod H Thourani (VH)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Marcus Valve Center, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Ga.

Lakshmi Prasad Dasi (LP)

Biomedical Engineering Department, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.

Classifications MeSH