Community engagement in epigenomic and neurocognitive research on post-traumatic stress disorder in Rwandans exposed to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi: lessons learned.
community engagement
epigenomics
genomics
memory
neuroscience
post-traumatic stress disorder
Journal
Epigenomics
ISSN: 1750-192X
Titre abrégé: Epigenomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101519720
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
26
8
2022
medline:
17
9
2022
entrez:
25
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Epigenomic and neurocognitive studies have provided new perspectives on post-traumatic stress disorder and its intergenerational transmission. This article outlines the lessons learned from community engagement (CE) in such research on Rwandan genocide survivors. A strong trauma-related response was observed within the research project-targeted community (genocide survivors) during explanation of the project. CE also revealed privacy concerns, as community members worried that any leakage of genetic/(epi)genomic data could affect not only themselves but also their close relatives. Adopting a culture of CE in the process of research implementation enables the prioritization of targeted community needs and interests. Furthermore, CE has stimulated the development of mental healthcare interventions, which married couples can apply to protect their offspring and thus truly break the cycle of inherited vulnerability. Studies of how human genes are affected by the environment (epigenomic studies) have provided new perspectives on post-traumatic stress disorder and its intergenerational transmission. This article describes the lessons learned from community engagement (CE) in this type of research in a Rwandan genocide-exposed population. A strong trauma-related response was observed within the community while explaining the project. CE also revealed the participants' privacy concerns related to leakage of genetic/(epi)genomic data that could also affect their close relatives. Adopting a culture of CE in the process of research implementation enables the prioritization of community needs and interests. CE has furthermore stimulated the development of preventive interventions for married couples to protect their offspring and thus truly break the cycle of inherited vulnerability.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Studies of how human genes are affected by the environment (epigenomic studies) have provided new perspectives on post-traumatic stress disorder and its intergenerational transmission. This article describes the lessons learned from community engagement (CE) in this type of research in a Rwandan genocide-exposed population. A strong trauma-related response was observed within the community while explaining the project. CE also revealed the participants' privacy concerns related to leakage of genetic/(epi)genomic data that could also affect their close relatives. Adopting a culture of CE in the process of research implementation enables the prioritization of community needs and interests. CE has furthermore stimulated the development of preventive interventions for married couples to protect their offspring and thus truly break the cycle of inherited vulnerability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36004496
doi: 10.2217/epi-2022-0079
pmc: PMC9475497
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
887-895Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : U01 MH115485
Pays : United States
Références
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 2;90:223-234
pubmed: 30503303
Hum Genomics. 2014 Aug 21;8:15
pubmed: 25145346
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Jul 15;11:13
pubmed: 20633282
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 4;20(1):45
pubmed: 31272489
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Sep;40(10):2287-97
pubmed: 25904361
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jan;74(1):67-74
pubmed: 22119520
BMC Med Ethics. 2007 Oct 26;8:11
pubmed: 17963497
Genome Biol. 2017 May 5;18(1):83
pubmed: 28476144
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2014 May;15(4):334-45
pubmed: 24690014
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Apr 12;16:24
pubmed: 25889051
Genes (Basel). 2017 Mar 18;8(3):
pubmed: 28335457
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 7;349(6):562-9
pubmed: 12904522
Cell. 2011 Apr 29;145(3):423-34
pubmed: 21496894
World Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;17(3):243-257
pubmed: 30192087
Nature. 2021 Jan;589(7841):276-280
pubmed: 33086375
Science. 2013 Aug 9;341(6146):1237905
pubmed: 23828890
J Affect Disord. 2020 Oct 1;275:7-13
pubmed: 32658827
Genet Med. 2015 Dec;17(12):949-57
pubmed: 25764215
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2014;47(4):337-46
pubmed: 25084856
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98
pubmed: 26606250
Ethn Dis. 2019 Feb 21;29(Suppl 1):173-178
pubmed: 30906166
Eur J Hum Genet. 2003 Dec;11 Suppl 2:S88-122
pubmed: 14718939
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Jan;38(1):23-38
pubmed: 22781841
Nat Genet. 1999 Nov;23(3):275-80
pubmed: 10545946
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2014;128:29-50
pubmed: 25410540
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2):
pubmed: 33627363
Science. 2000 Aug 18;289(5482):1142-4
pubmed: 10970227
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Apr;50(4):257-64
pubmed: 8466386
Epigenomics. 2022 Jan;14(1):11-25
pubmed: 34875875
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 17;20(1):73
pubmed: 31623624
JAMA. 2004 Sep 22;292(12):1469-73
pubmed: 15383518
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 May;23(5):1145-1156
pubmed: 28630453
J Investig Med. 2014 Aug;62(6):851-5
pubmed: 24979468
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Jun;158(6):551-5
pubmed: 15184218
Prog Brain Res. 2009;178:263-83
pubmed: 19874976
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Apr;14:5-11
pubmed: 27933312
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012 Oct;19(10):1037-43
pubmed: 22961382
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 21;7:10967
pubmed: 26997371
J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Sep;40(6):550-67
pubmed: 16214171
N Engl J Med. 2002 May 23;346(21):1609-15
pubmed: 12023992
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 25;11:20
pubmed: 32158407
Acta Trop. 2009 Nov;112 Suppl 1:S21-31
pubmed: 19665983
Neuroimage. 2022 Apr 15;250:118954
pubmed: 35093520
Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2021 Jun 26;2021:9926495
pubmed: 34527261