Oropharyngeal reconstruction after transoral robotic surgery.


Journal

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery
ISSN: 1531-6998
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9417024

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Oct 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 26 8 2022
medline: 31 8 2022
entrez: 25 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has experienced an evolution in recent years. This technique has proved to be a safe and effective method for extirpation of select oropharyngeal tumors. Advances in technology as well as improved surgeon experience allow for the resection of larger, more complex cancers. Although healing by secondary intention remains the current standard for limited oropharyngeal defects, larger resections demand reconstruction with vascularized tissue to minimize morbidity and optimize functional outcomes. The objective of this review is to evaluate recent literature regarding oropharyngeal reconstruction after TORS. A variety of reconstructive options to manage oropharyngeal defects exist. Several reconstructive algorithms have been suggested; however, careful consideration must be used to select the most ideal flap type. Locoregional flaps have shown excellent functional outcomes with limited morbidity. An increase in free flap reconstruction has been demonstrated, particularly among patients with larger TORS defects and following chemoradiation therapy. Despite limited data, robotic-assisted flap inset and microvascular anastomosis has recently shown promise. Reconstruction and flap selection following TORS should be tailored to the patient and unique oropharyngeal defect. Functional outcomes are promising with low complication rates among these patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36004787
doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000842
pii: 00020840-202210000-00019
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

384-391

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Holsinger FC, Laccourreye O, Weber RS. Surgical approaches for cancer of the oropharynx. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 16:40–48.
Hedayat F, Jerry Htwe KK, Vassiliou LV, Kyzas P. Morbidity related to the lip-split mandibulotomy approach: a systematic and narrative review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022; 60:430–436.
de Almeida JR, Moskowitz AJ, Miles BA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery versus (chemo)radiotherapy for early T classification oropharyngeal carcinoma: a cost-utility analysis. Head Neck 2016; 38:589–600.
Thaler ER. History and acceptance of transoral robotic surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2020; 53:943–948.
O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 2006; 116:1465–1472.
Jefferson GD, Frey H. Open versus robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2020; 53:995–1003.
Nguyen AT, Luu M, Mallen-St Clair J, et al. Comparison of survival after transoral robotic surgery vs nonrobotic surgery in patients with early-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:1555–1562.
Li H, Torabi SJ, Park HS, et al. Clinical value of transoral robotic surgery: nationwide results from the first 5 years of adoption. Laryngoscope 2019; 129:1844–1855.
Hardman J, Liu Z, Brady G, et al. Transoral robotic surgery for recurrent cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract-Systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck 2020; 42:1089–1104.
Gorphe P, Temam S, Moya-Plana A, et al. Indications and clinical outcomes of transoral robotic surgery and free flap reconstruction. Cancers 2021; 13:2831doi: 10.3390/cancers13112831.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13112831
Gal TJ, Slezak JA, Kejner AE, et al. Treatment trends in oropharyngeal carcinoma: surgical technology meets the epidemic. Oral Oncol 2019; 97:62–68.
Liederbach E, Lewis CM, Yao K, et al. A contemporary analysis of surgical trends in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx from 1998 to 2012: a report from the national cancer database. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:4422–4431.
Caudell JJ, Gillison ML, Maghami E, et al. NCCN Guidelines® insights: head and neck cancers, version 1.2022. J Natl Compreh Cancer Netw 2022; 20:224–234.
Roselló À, Albuquerque R, Roselló-Llabrés X, et al. Transoral robotic surgery vs open surgery in head and neck cancer. A systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patologia Oral Cirugia Bucal 2020; 25:e599–e607.
Park DA, Lee MJ, Kim SH, Lee SH. Comparative safety and effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery versus open surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:644–649.
Sgarzani R, Meccariello G, Montevecchi F, et al. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: healing by secondary intention, local flap or free flap. Eur J Plastic Surg 2020; 43:123–128.
Barrette LX, De Ravin E, Carey RM, et al. Reconstruction following transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer: systematic review. Head Neck 2022; 44:1246–1254.
Sabri A. Oropharyngeal reconstruction: current state of the art. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11:251–254.
Welkoborsky HJ, Deichmüller C, Bauer L, Hinni ML. Reconstruction of large pharyngeal defects with microvascular free flaps and myocutaneous pedicled flaps. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 21:318–327.
Meccariello G, Montevecchi F, Sgarzani R, et al. The reconstructive options for oropharyngeal defects in the transoral robotic surgery framework. Oral Oncol 2017; 66:108–111.
Meccariello G, Montevecchi F, Sgarzani R, Vicini C. Defect-oriented reconstruction after transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a case series and review of the literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Italica 2018; 38:569–574.
Kelly K, Johnson-Obaseki S, Lumingu J, Corsten M. Oncologic, functional and surgical outcomes of primary transoral robotic surgery for early squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx: a systematic review. Oral Oncol 2014; 50:696–703.
Hay A, Migliacci J, Karassawa Zanoni D, et al. Complications following transoral robotic surgery (TORS): a detailed institutional review of complications. Oral Oncol 2017; 67:160–166.
Eesa M, Montevecchi F, Hendawy E, et al. Swallowing outcome after TORS for sleep apnea: short- and long-term evaluation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272:1537–1541.
Petrie K, Cox CT, Becker BC, MacKay BJ. Clinical applications of acellular dermal matrices: a review. Scars Burns Heal 2022; 8:20595131211038313.
Mannelli G, Arcuri F, Agostini T, et al. Classification of tongue cancer resection and treatment algorithm. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117:1092–1099.
González García J, Pollán Guisasola C, Chiesa Estomba CM, et al. Reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects after transoral robotic surgery. Review and recommendations of the Commission of Head and Neck Surgery of the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2019; 70:235–244.
Hatten KM, Brody RM, Weinstein GS, et al. Defining the role of free flaps for transoral robotic surgery. Ann Plastic Surg 2018; 80:45–49.
Avilés-Jurado FX, Vilaseca I. Transoral reconstruction of oropharyngeal tumors. The Hospital Clínic algorithm. JPRAS Open 2020; 24:25–31.
de Almeida JR, Park RC, Genden EM. Reconstruction of transoral robotic surgery defects: principles and techniques. J Reconstruct Microsurg 2012; 28:465–472.
de Almeida JR, Park RC, Villanueva NL, et al. Reconstructive algorithm and classification system for transoral oropharyngeal defects. Head Neck 2014; 36:934–941.
Lucas JB. The physiology and biomechanics of skin flaps. Facial Plastic Surg Clin North Am 2017; 25:303–311.
Patel S, Ziai K, Lighthall JG, Walen SG. Biologics and acellular dermal matrices in head and neck reconstruction: a comprehensive review. Am J Otolaryngol 2022; 43:103233.
Sinha UK, Chang KE, Shih CW. Reconstruction of pharyngeal defects using AlloDerm and sternocleidomastoid muscle flap. Laryngoscope 2001; 111:1910–1916.
Chia SH, Gross ND, Richmon JD. Surgeon experience and complications with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 149:885–892.
Ayad T, Xie L. Facial artery musculomucosal flap in head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review. Head Neck 2015; 37:1375–1386.
Asairinachan A, O’Duffy F, Li MP, et al. Facial artery musculomucosal flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction following salvage transoral robotic surgery: a review of outcomes. J Laryngol Otol 2019; 133:884–888.
Bonawitz SC, Duvvuri U. Robotic-assisted FAMM flap for soft palate reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2013; 123:870–874.
Genden EM, Park R, Smith C, Kotz T. The role of reconstruction for transoral robotic pharyngectomy and concomitant neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 137:151–156.
Karle WE, Anand SM, Clain JB, et al. Total soft palate reconstruction using the palatal island and lateral pharyngeal wall flaps. Laryngoscope 2013; 123:929–933.
Gillespie MB, Eisele DW. The uvulopalatal flap for reconstruction of the soft palate. Laryngoscope 2000; 110:612–615.
Zeitels SM, Kim J. Soft-palate reconstruction with a “SCARF” superior-constrictor advancement-rotation flap. Laryngoscope 1998; 108:1136–1140.
Day AT, Haughey BH, Rich JT. Prevertebral muscle flap for internal carotid artery coverage during oropharyngeal transoral surgery. Laryngoscope 2017; 127:2256–2259.
Koh KS, Eom JS, Kirk I, et al. Pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap in oropharyngeal reconstruction: revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118:1145–1149.
Wei W, Qiu Y, Fang Q, Jia Y. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in salvage reconstruction following free flap failure in head and neck cancer surgery. J Int Med Res 2019; 47:76–83.
Pinheiro-Neto CD, Galati LT. Nasoseptal flap for reconstruction after robotic radical tonsillectomy. Head Neck 2016; 38:E2495–E2498.
Turner MT, Geltzeiler M, Albergotti WG, et al. Reconstruction of TORS oropharyngectomy defects with the nasoseptal flap via transpalatal tunnel. J Robot Surg 2020; 14:311–316.
Turner MT, Geltzeiler MN, Ramadan J, et al. The nasoseptal flap for reconstruction of lateral oropharyngectomy defects: a clinical series. Laryngoscope 2022; 132:53–60.
Holcomb AJ, Richmon JD. Transoral robotic salvage oropharyngectomy with submental artery island flap reconstruction. Head Neck 2021; 43:E13–E19.
Meccariello G, Montevecchi F, Deganello A, et al. The temporalis muscle flap for reconstruction of soft palate and lateral oropharyngeal wall after transoral robotic surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 2018; 45:162–164.
Caliceti U, Piccin O, Sgarzani R, et al. Surgical strategies based on standard templates for microsurgical reconstruction of oral cavity and oropharynx soft tissue: a 20 years’ experience. Microsurgery 2013; 33:90–104.
Chepeha DB, Sacco AG, Erickson VR, et al. Oropharyngoplasty with template-based reconstruction of oropharynx defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 135:887–894.
Seikaly H, Rieger J, Zalmanowitz J, et al. Functional soft palate reconstruction: a comprehensive surgical approach. Head Neck 2008; 30:1615–1623.
Biron VL, O’Connell DA, Barber B, et al. Transoral robotic surgery with radial forearm free flap reconstruction: case control analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 46:20.
Park CW, Miles BA. The expanding role of the anterolateral thigh free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 19:263–268.
Sun SL, Zhong B, Zhou SZ, et al. Comparison between anterolateral thigh free flap and jejunal flap for tissue reconstruction in patients underwent resection of pharyngoesophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radiotherapy failure: a retrospective study. BMC Surg 2021; 21:389.
Wang KC, Tsai CC, Chang CH, et al. Comparison of flap outcomes between single- and multiple-perforator-based free anterolateral thigh flap in head and neck reconstruction. Microsurgery 2019; 39:150–155.
Ghanem TA. Transoral robotic-assisted microvascular reconstruction of the oropharynx. Laryngoscope 2011; 121:580–582.
Alcalde J, Pastor MJ, Quesada JL, et al. Reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects with lateral arm flap. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2001; 52:39–44.
Bach CA, Wagner I, Pigot JL, et al. Velopharyngeal function after free thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in lateral and superior oropharyngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272:3019–3026.
Choi JW, Nam SY, Choi SH, et al. Applications of medial sural perforator free flap for head and neck reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29:437–442.
Selber JC. Transoral robotic reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126:1978–1987.
Lai CS, Chen IC, Liu SA, et al. Robot-assisted free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal cancer – a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 74: (Suppl 2): S105–S108.
Chalmers R, Schlabe J, Yeung E, et al. Robot-assisted reconstruction in head and neck surgical oncology: the evolving role of the reconstructive microsurgeon. ORL 2018; 80:178–185.

Auteurs

Dustin A Silverman (DA)

Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of California - Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH