Analysis of Functional Recovery in Older Adults Discharged to Skilled Nursing Facilities and Then Home.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2022
01 08 2022
Historique:
entrez:
25
8
2022
pubmed:
26
8
2022
medline:
30
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although many older adults are discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) after hospitalization, rates of patients recovery afterward are unknown. To examine postacute functional recovery among older adults. This cohort study was conducted among older adults treated in SNFs, then at home with home health care (HHC). Participants were a 5% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged to community HHC after SNF stay from 2014 to 2016 with continuous part A and B enrollment in the prior 6 months. Medicare claims data from 2014 to 2016 were used, including inpatient, SNF, hospice, HHC, outpatient, carrier, and durable medical equipment data and Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Outcome Assessment Information Set (OASIS) for SNF and HHC assessments, respectively. Data were analyzed from July 20, 2020, to June 5, 2022. Frailty was measured with a validated claims-based frailty index (CFI) (range, 0-1; higher scores indicate worse frailty) and categorized into not frail (<0.20), mildly frail (0.20-0.29), and moderately to severely frail (≥0.30). The primary outcome was functional recovery, defined by discharge from HHC with stable or improved ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). Recovery status was examined at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 days after discharge to HHC using OASIS. Covariates were obtained from the MDS admission file at SNF admission, including age, race and ethnicity, cognitive status, functional status, and geographic region. Among 105 232 beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 79.1 [10.6] years; 68 637 [65.2%] women; 8951 Black [8.5%], 3109 Hispanic [3.0%], and 88 583 White [84.2%] individuals), 65 796 individuals (62.5%) were discharged from HHC services with improved function over 90 days of follow-up. Among 39 436 beneficiaries not recovered, 19 612 individuals (49.7%) had mild frailty and 15 818 individuals (40.1%) had moderate to severe frailty. While 10 492 of 17 576 beneficiaries who were not frail recovered by 45 days (59.7%), 10 755 of 32 212 individuals with moderate to severe frailty had recovered (33.4%). Overall, frailty was negatively associated with functional recovery after adjustment for demographic characteristics, geographic census regions, and health-related variables, with a hazard ratio for moderate to severe frailty of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.60-0.63) compared with nonfrailty. This study found that recovery after posthospitalization SNF stay was particularly prolonged for individuals with frailty. Functional dependence in activities of daily living remained common among individuals with frailty long after discharge home.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36006647
pii: 2795638
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25452
pmc: PMC9412223
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2225452Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : T32 AG023480
Pays : United States
Références
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 May;22(5):1022-1028.e1
pubmed: 33417841
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):853-859
pubmed: 28647577
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jun;33(6):946-56
pubmed: 24889943
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 May 22;75(6):1120-1125
pubmed: 31566201
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):1880-1886
pubmed: 29656399
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55(9):e68-e72
pubmed: 25763665
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;64(7):749-59
pubmed: 21208778
JAMA. 2010 Nov 3;304(17):1919-28
pubmed: 21045098
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):408-409
pubmed: 30699322
PM R. 2018 Nov;10(11):1211-1220
pubmed: 29550407
Age Ageing. 2016 May;45(3):353-60
pubmed: 26944937
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;73(7):980-987
pubmed: 29244057
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Jul 12;74(8):1257-1264
pubmed: 30307533
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Apr;20(4):492-496
pubmed: 30630726
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jan;66(1):56-63
pubmed: 29112226
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1573-1578
pubmed: 32294239
Gerontologist. 2017 Nov 10;57(6):1123-1132
pubmed: 27927728
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62
pubmed: 23395245
JAMA. 2004 Nov 3;292(17):2115-24
pubmed: 15523072
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):96-102
pubmed: 31603248
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Jun;18(6):1100-1108
pubmed: 34427383
Arch Intern Med. 2011 May 23;171(10):923-8
pubmed: 21357797
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Sep;174(9):1214-1223
pubmed: 34280330
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):617-623
pubmed: 30855652
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Mar;68(3):486-495
pubmed: 32083319
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Jul 12;74(8):1271-1276
pubmed: 30165612
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):678-684
pubmed: 29427179
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1445-1472
pubmed: 27468707
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):864-870
pubmed: 30056009
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Jul;62(7):722-7
pubmed: 17634318
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999 Nov;54(11):M546-53
pubmed: 10619316
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222448
pubmed: 35294541
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;148:84-93
pubmed: 33667443
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Mar 1;17(3):225-31
pubmed: 26620073
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Mar;8(1):100378
pubmed: 31708403
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56
pubmed: 11253156
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Apr;20(4):396-398
pubmed: 30954132
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Oct 4;74(11):1771-1777
pubmed: 30668637