Editor's Choice - Real World Study of Mortality After the Use of Paclitaxel Coated Devices in Peripheral Vascular Intervention.
Device safety
Drug eluting stent
Drug-coated balloon
Paclitaxel
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
Peripheral vascular intervention
Journal
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
ISSN: 1532-2165
Titre abrégé: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9512728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
08
04
2022
revised:
27
07
2022
accepted:
09
08
2022
pmc-release:
01
01
2024
pubmed:
26
8
2022
medline:
26
8
2022
entrez:
25
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This observational cohort study examined outcomes after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) with paclitaxel coated devices (PCD) and non-PCD, and evaluated heterogeneity of treatment effect in populations of interest. The study included patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and or stent placement between 1 October 2015 and 31 December 2018 in the Vascular Quality Initiative Registry linked to Medicare claims. It determined differences in patient mortality and ipsilateral major amputation after PVI with PCD and non-PCD using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regressions with inverse probability weighting in three cohorts: (A) patients treated for femoropopliteal or infrapopliteal occlusive disease with or without any other concurrent treatment (n = 11 452); (B) those treated for isolated superficial femoral or popliteal artery disease (n = 5 519); and (C) patients with inclusion criteria designed to approximate RCT populations (n = 2 278). The mean age of patients was 72.3 (SD = 10.9) years, and 40.6% were female. In cohort A, patients receiving PCD had a lower mortality rate (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 - 0.98) than those receiving non-PCD. There was no significant difference in mortality between groups in cohort B (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 - 1.04) and cohort C (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.43). Patients receiving PCD did not have a significantly elevated risk of major amputation compared with those receiving non-PCD (cohort A: HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 - 1.00; cohort B: HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67 - 1.06; and cohort C: HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.51 - 2.14). No increased patient mortality or major amputation was found at three years after PVI with PCD vs. non-PCD in this large, linked registry claims study, after accounting for heterogeneity of treatment effect by population. The analysis and results from three cohorts intended to mirror the cohorts of previous studies provide robust and niche real world evidence on PCD safety and help to understand and reconcile previously discrepant findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36007713
pii: S1078-5884(22)00520-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.08.014
pmc: PMC9839562
mid: NIHMS1857563
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
131-140Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K01 HL159315
Pays : United States
Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : U01 FD006936
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 European Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.
Références
Stat Methods Med Res. 2013 Jun;22(3):278-95
pubmed: 21220355
Circulation. 2020 Jun 9;141(23):1859-1869
pubmed: 32370548
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;61(1):5-6
pubmed: 33451468
EuroIntervention. 2021 Sep 20;17(7):590-598
pubmed: 33342764
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2636-2638
pubmed: 30831175
Am Heart J. 2019 Nov;217:42-51
pubmed: 31473326
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):145-53
pubmed: 26106946
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;59(4):587-596
pubmed: 31926836
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2329-2338
pubmed: 26476467
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):713-719
pubmed: 28742684
Am Heart J. 2021 Mar;233:59-67
pubmed: 33321119
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008528
pubmed: 32069110
J Endovasc Ther. 2021 Oct;28(5):755-777
pubmed: 34106028
Circulation. 2017 Sep 19;136(12):1102-1113
pubmed: 28729250
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jul;76(1):266-271.e2
pubmed: 35181518
Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):937-48
pubmed: 17869634
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):2153-2160
pubmed: 32442604
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1071-1080
pubmed: 33993204
Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 7;41(38):3732-3739
pubmed: 31593987
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;63(1):60-71
pubmed: 34326002
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;60(4):549-558
pubmed: 32807674
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Apr 1;4(4):332-340
pubmed: 30747949
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 16;10(4):e018149
pubmed: 33554613
Circulation. 2017 Jun 6;135(23):2227-2236
pubmed: 28424223
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 02;10(13):
pubmed: 34279461
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 May;63(5):769-770
pubmed: 35307266
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424
pubmed: 21818162
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 24;383(26):2538-2546
pubmed: 33296560
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):751-759.e1
pubmed: 28222989
J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1529-37
pubmed: 22542349
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 13;13(7):902-904
pubmed: 32273103
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e011245
pubmed: 30561254