Directed information flow during laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition dissociated skill level and medical simulation technology.
Journal
NPJ science of learning
ISSN: 2056-7936
Titre abrégé: NPJ Sci Learn
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101689142
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Aug 2022
25 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
04
10
2021
accepted:
04
08
2022
entrez:
25
8
2022
pubmed:
26
8
2022
medline:
26
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Virtual reality (VR) simulator has emerged as a laparoscopic surgical skill training tool that needs validation using brain-behavior analysis. Therefore, brain network and skilled behavior relationship were evaluated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) from seven experienced right-handed surgeons and six right-handed medical students during the performance of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) pattern of cutting tasks in a physical and a VR simulator. Multiple regression and path analysis (MRPA) found that the FLS performance score was statistically significantly related to the interregional directed functional connectivity from the right prefrontal cortex to the supplementary motor area with F (2, 114) = 9, p < 0.001, and R
Identifiants
pubmed: 36008451
doi: 10.1038/s41539-022-00138-7
pii: 10.1038/s41539-022-00138-7
pmc: PMC9411170
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
19Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Riener, R. & Harders, M. Virtual Reality in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4011-5 (Springer-Verlag, 2012).
Wolpert, D. M. & Miall, R. C. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 9, 1265–1279 (1996).
pubmed: 12662535
doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4
Kawato, M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 718–727 (1999).
pubmed: 10607637
doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00028-8
Orban de Xivry, J.-J. & Ethier, V. Neural Correlates of Internal Models. J. Neurosci. 28, 7931–7932 (2008).
pubmed: 18685017
pmcid: 2547887
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2426-08.2008
Gibson, J. J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. (Psychology Press, 2014).
Renner, R. S., Velichkovsky, B. M. & Helmert, J. R. The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments—a review. ACM Comput. Surv. 46, 1–23 (2013). 2340.
doi: 10.1145/2543581.2543590
Cioffi, D. Beyond attentional strategies: cognitive-perceptual model of somatic interpretation. Psychol. Bull. 109, 25–41 (1991).
pubmed: 2006227
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.1.25
Sommer, M. A. & Wurtz, R. H. Brain circuits for the internal monitoring of movements. Annu Rev. Neurosci. 31, 317–338 (2008).
pubmed: 18558858
pmcid: 2813694
doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125627
Popa, L. S. & Ebner, T. J. Cerebellum, predictions and errors. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12, 524 (2019).
pubmed: 30697149
pmcid: 6340992
doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00524
Christensen, A. et al. An intact action-perception coupling depends on the integrity of the cerebellum. J. Neurosci. 34, 6707–6716 (2014).
pubmed: 24806697
pmcid: 6608134
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3276-13.2014
Ito, M. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 304–313 (2008).
pubmed: 18319727
doi: 10.1038/nrn2332
Proville, R. D. et al. Cerebellum involvement in cortical sensorimotor circuits for the control of voluntary movements. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1233–1239 (2014).
pubmed: 25064850
doi: 10.1038/nn.3773
Uehara, S., Mawase, F., Therrien, A. S., Cherry-Allen, K. M. & Celnik, P. Interactions between motor exploration and reinforcement learning. J. Neurophysiol. 122, 797–808 (2019).
pubmed: 31242063
pmcid: 6734400
doi: 10.1152/jn.00390.2018
Hannah, T. C. et al. Neuromonitoring correlates of expertise level in surgical performers: a systematic review. Front Hum. Neurosci. 16, 705238 (2022).
pubmed: 35250509
pmcid: 8888846
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.705238
Vetter, P., Flash, T. & Wolpert, D. M. Planning movements in a simple redundant task. Curr. Biol. 12, 488–491 (2002).
pubmed: 11909535
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00715-7
Grantcharov, T. P. & Funch-Jensen, P. Can everyone achieve proficiency with the laparoscopic technique? Learning curve patterns in technical skills acquisition. Am. J. Surg. 197, 447–449 (2009).
pubmed: 19217604
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.01.024
Phillips, H. N., Howai, N. A., Stan, G.-B. V. & Faisal, A. A. The implied exploration-exploitation trade-off in human motor learning. BMC Neurosci. 12, P98 (2011).
pmcid: 3240570
doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-S1-P98
Poldrack, R. A. et al. The neural correlates of motor skill automaticity. J. Neurosci. 25, 5356–5364 (2005).
pubmed: 15930384
pmcid: 6725010
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3880-04.2005
Feng, S. F., Wang, S., Zarnescu, S. & Wilson, R. C. The dynamics of explore–exploit decisions reveal a signal-to-noise mechanism for random exploration. Sci. Rep. 11, 3077 (2021).
pubmed: 33542333
pmcid: 7862437
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82530-8
Todorov, D. I. et al. The interplay between cerebellum and basal ganglia in motor adaptation: a modeling study. PLOS ONE 14, e0214926 (2019).
pubmed: 30978216
pmcid: 6461234
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214926
Sedaghat-Nejad, E. & Shadmehr, R. The cost of correcting for error during sensorimotor adaptation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2101717118 (2021).
pubmed: 34580215
pmcid: 8501785
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101717118
Ericsson, K. A. The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. in The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (eds. Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J. & Hoffman, R. R.) 683–704. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.038 (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Tomov, M. S., Truong, V. Q., Hundia, R. A. & Gershman, S. J. Dissociable neural correlates of uncertainty underlie different exploration strategies. Nat. Commun. 11, 2371 (2020).
pubmed: 32398675
pmcid: 7217879
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15766-z
Levac, D. E., Huber, M. E. & Sternad, D. Learning and transfer of complex motor skills in virtual reality: a perspective review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilitation 16, 121 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0587-8
Haar, S., Donchin, O. & Dinstein, I. Individual movement variability magnitudes are explained by cortical neural variability. J. Neurosci. 37, 9076–9085 (2017).
pubmed: 28821678
pmcid: 6596801
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1650-17.2017
Fuster, J. M. Chapter 8—Prefrontal cortex in Decision-Making: The Perception–Action Cycle. in Decision Neuroscience (eds. Dreher, J.-C. & Tremblay, L.) 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805308-9.00008-7 (Academic Press, 2017).
Little, D. Y. & Sommer, F. T. Learning and exploration in action-perception loops. Front. Neural Circuits 7, 37 (2013).
pubmed: 23579347
pmcid: 3619626
doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00037
Yücel, M. A., Selb, J. J., Huppert, T. J., Franceschini, M. A. & Boas, D. A. Functional near infrared spectroscopy: enabling routine functional brain imaging. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 4, 78–86 (2017).
pubmed: 29457144
pmcid: 5810962
doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2017.09.011
Nemani, A. et al. Assessing bimanual motor skills with optical neuroimaging. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat3807 (2018).
pubmed: 30306130
pmcid: 6170034
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat3807
Birkmeyer, J. D. et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1434–1442 (2013).
pubmed: 24106936
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1300625
Dehabadi, M., Fernando, B. & Berlingieri, P. The use of simulation in the acquisition of laparoscopic suturing skills. Int. J. Surg. 12, 258–268 (2014).
pubmed: 24503123
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.022
Bahrami, P. et al. Functional MRI-compatible laparoscopic surgery training simulator. Magn. Reson. Med. 65, 873–881 (2011).
pubmed: 21337414
doi: 10.1002/mrm.22664
Roberts, K. E., Bell, R. L. & Duffy, A. J. Evolution of surgical skills training. World J. Gastroenterol. 12, 3219–3224 (2006).
pubmed: 16718842
pmcid: 4087965
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i20.3219
Kunert, W. et al. Learning curves, potential and speed in training of laparoscopic skills: a randomised comparative study in a box trainer. Surg. Endosc. 35, 3303–3312 (2021).
pubmed: 32642847
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07768-1
Marucci, M. et al. The impact of multisensory integration and perceptual load in virtual reality settings on performance, workload and presence. Sci. Rep. 11, 4831 (2021).
pubmed: 33649348
pmcid: 7921449
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84196-8
Seidler, R. D., Kwak, Y., Fling, B. W. & Bernard, J. A. Neurocognitive mechanisms of error-based motor learning. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 782, 39–60 (2013).
pubmed: 23296480
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5465-6_3
Wright, W. G. Using virtual reality to augment perception, enhance sensorimotor adaptation, and change our minds. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8, 56 (2014).
pubmed: 24782724
pmcid: 3986528
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00056
Voorhorst, F., Meijer, D., Overbeeke, C. & Smets, G. Depth perception in laparoscopy through perception-action coupling. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 7, 325–334 (1998).
doi: 10.3109/13645709809152876
Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R. & Wolf, P. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20, 21–53 (2013).
pubmed: 23132605
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8
Ritter, E. M. & Scott, D. J. Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Innov. 14, 107–112 (2007).
pubmed: 17558016
doi: 10.1177/1553350607302329
Toner, J., Montero, B. G. & Moran, A. The perils of automaticity. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 19, 431–442 (2015).
doi: 10.1037/gpr0000054
Welniarz, Q., Worbe, Y. & Gallea, C. The forward model: a unifying theory for the role of the cerebellum in motor control and sense of agency. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 15 (2021).
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C. & Kawato, M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 338–347 (1998).
pubmed: 21227230
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01221-2
Cataldi, S., Stanley, A. T., Miniaci, M. C. & Sulzer, D. Interpreting the role of the striatum during multiple phases of motor learning. FEBS J. 289, 2263–2281 (2022).
pubmed: 33977645
doi: 10.1111/febs.15908
Badre, D. & D’Esposito, M. Is the rostro-caudal axis of the frontal lobe hierarchical? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 659–669 (2009).
pubmed: 19672274
pmcid: 3258028
doi: 10.1038/nrn2667
Ohuchida, K. et al. The frontal cortex is activated during learning of endoscopic procedures. Surg. Endosc. 23, 2296–2301 (2009).
pubmed: 19172351
doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0316-z
Leff, D. R., Orihuela-Espina, F., Leong, J., Darzi, A. & Yang, G.-Z. Modelling dynamic fronto-parietal behaviour during minimally invasive surgery–a Markovian trip distribution approach. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Inter. 11, 595–602 (2008).
Wanzel, K. R. et al. Visual-spatial ability and fMRI cortical activation in surgery residents. Am. J. Surg. 193, 507–510 (2007).
pubmed: 17368300
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.11.011
Leff, D. R., Orihuela-Espina, F., Atallah, L., Darzi, A. & Yang, G.-Z. Functional near infrared spectroscopy in novice and expert surgeons–a manifold embedding approach. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Inter. 10, 270–277 (2007).
Gao, Y. et al. Decreasing the surgical errors by neurostimulation of primary motor cortex and the associated brain activation via neuroimaging. Front. Neurosci. 15, 651192 (2021).
pubmed: 33828456
pmcid: 8019915
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.651192
Leff, D. R. et al. Functional prefrontal reorganization accompanies learning-associated refinements in surgery: a manifold embedding approach. Comput. Aided Surg. 13, 325–339 (2008).
pubmed: 18991082
doi: 10.3109/10929080802531482
Khoe, H. C. H. et al. Use of prefrontal cortex activity as a measure of learning curve in surgical novices: results of a single blind randomised controlled trial. Surg. Endosc. 34, 5604–5615 (2020).
pubmed: 31953730
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07331-7
Gao, Y. et al. Functional brain imaging reliably predicts bimanual motor skill performance in a standardized surgical task. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 68, 2058–2066 (2021).
pubmed: 32755850
pmcid: 8265734
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3014299
Shi, Y., Zhu, Y., Mehta, R. K. & Du, J. A neurophysiological approach to assess training outcome under stress: A virtual reality experiment of industrial shutdown maintenance using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Adv. Eng. Inform. 46, 101153 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101153
Kaminski, M. J. & Blinowska, K. J. A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biol. Cybern. 65, 203–210 (1991).
pubmed: 1912013
doi: 10.1007/BF00198091
Kamiński, M., Ding, M., Truccolo, W. A. & Bressler, S. L. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol. Cyber. 85, 145–157 (2001).
doi: 10.1007/s004220000235
Tak, S. & Ye, J. C. Statistical analysis of fNIRS data: a comprehensive review. Neuroimage 85, 72–91 (2014). Pt 1.
pubmed: 23774396
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.016
Streiner, D. L. Finding our way: an introduction to path analysis. Can. J. Psychiatry 50, 115–122 (2005).
pubmed: 15807228
doi: 10.1177/070674370505000207
Heitger, M. H. et al. Motor learning-induced changes in functional brain connectivity as revealed by means of graph-theoretical network analysis. NeuroImage 61, 633–650 (2012).
pubmed: 22503778
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.067
Gerraty, R. T., Davidow, J. Y., Wimmer, G. E., Kahn, I. & Shohamy, D. Transfer of learning relates to intrinsic connectivity between hippocampus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and large-scale networks. J. Neurosci. 34, 11297–11303 (2014).
pubmed: 25143610
pmcid: 4138340
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0185-14.2014
Strangman, G. E., Li, Z. & Zhang, Q. Depth sensitivity and source-detector separations for near infrared spectroscopy based on the Colin27 brain template. PLoS ONE 8, e66319 (2013).
pubmed: 23936292
pmcid: 3731322
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066319
Hutchison, R. M. et al. Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage 80, 360–378 (2013).
pubmed: 23707587
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079
Kao, C.-H. et al. Functional brain network reconfiguration during learning in a dynamic environment. Nat. Commun. 11, 1682 (2020).
pubmed: 32245973
pmcid: 7125157
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15442-2
Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B. & Barnett, L. Granger causality analysis in neuroscience and neuroimaging. J. Neurosci. 35, 3293–3297 (2015).
pubmed: 25716830
pmcid: 4339347
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4399-14.2015
Prasad, R., Muniyandi, M., Manoharan, G. & Chandramohan, S. M. Face and construct validity of a novel virtual reality–based bimanual laparoscopic force-skills trainer with haptics feedback. Surg. Innov. 25, 499–514 (2018).
pubmed: 29808782
doi: 10.1177/1553350618773666
Dutta, A. et al. Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity in the Primary Motor Cortex Distinguishes Between Training on a Physical and a Virtual Surgical Simulator. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2021 (eds de Bruijne, M. et al.) 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_61 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).
Dhamala, M., Rangarajan, G. & Ding, M. Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality. NeuroImage 41, 354–362 (2008).
pubmed: 18394927
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.020
Willingham, D. B. A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychol. Rev. 105, 558–584 (1998).
pubmed: 9697430
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.558
Fuster, J. M. Upper processing stages of the perception—action cycle. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 143–145 (2004).
pubmed: 15551481
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.004
Latash, M. L. Efference copy in kinesthetic perception: a copy of what is it? J. Neurophysiol. 125, 1079–1094 (2021).
pubmed: 33566734
pmcid: 8282223
doi: 10.1152/jn.00545.2020
Raos, V. & Savaki, H. E. The role of the prefrontal cortex in action perception. Cereb. Cortex 27, 4677–4690 (2017).
pubmed: 27600843
Haggard, P. Sense of agency in the human brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 196–207 (2017).
pubmed: 28251993
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.14
Fuster, J. M. The prefrontal cortex—an update: time is of the essence. Neuron 30, 319–333 (2001).
pubmed: 11394996
doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00285-9
Lebedev, M. A., Douglass, D. K., Moody, S. L. & Wise, S. P. Prefrontal cortex neurons reflecting reports of a visual illusion. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 1395–1411 (2001).
pubmed: 11287464
doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.4.1395
Rolls, E. T., Huang, C.-C., Lin, C.-P., Feng, J. & Joliot, M. Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3. NeuroImage 206, 116189 (2020).
pubmed: 31521825
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116189
Japee, S., Holiday, K., Satyshur, M. D., Mukai, I. & Ungerleider, L. G. A role of right middle frontal gyrus in reorienting of attention: a case study. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, 23 (2015).
pubmed: 25784862
pmcid: 4347607
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00023
Cona, G. & Semenza, C. Supplementary motor area as key structure for domain-general sequence processing: a unified account. Neurosci. Biobehav Rev. 72, 28–42 (2017).
pubmed: 27856331
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.033
Sadato, N., Yonekura, Y., Waki, A., Yamada, H. & Ishii, Y. Role of the supplementary motor area and the right premotor cortex in the coordination of bimanual finger movements. J. Neurosci. 17, 9667–9674 (1997).
pubmed: 9391021
pmcid: 6573404
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-24-09667.1997
Swinnen, S. P. & Wenderoth, N. Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 18–25 (2004).
pubmed: 14697399
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.017
Toyokura, M., Muro, I., Komiya, T. & Obara, M. Relation of bimanual coordination to activation in the sensorimotor cortex and supplementary motor area: analysis using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res Bull. 48, 211–217 (1999).
pubmed: 10230712
doi: 10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00165-8
Ullén, F., Forssberg, H. & Ehrsson, H. H. Neural networks for the coordination of the hands in time. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 1126–1135 (2003).
pubmed: 12574485
doi: 10.1152/jn.00775.2002
Gerloff, C., Corwell, B., Chen, R., Hallett, M. & Cohen, L. G. Stimulation over the human supplementary motor area interferes with the organization of future elements in complex motor sequences. Brain 120, 1587–1602 (1997). Pt 9.
pubmed: 9313642
doi: 10.1093/brain/120.9.1587
Mushiake, H., Fujii, N. & Tanji, J. Visually guided saccade versus eye-hand reach: contrasting neuronal activity in the cortical supplementary and frontal eye fields. J. Neurophysiol. 75, 2187–2191 (1996).
pubmed: 8734617
doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.5.2187
Pierrot-Deseilligny, C., Israël, I., Berthoz, A., Rivaud, S. & Gaymard, B. Role of the different frontal lobe areas in the control of the horizontal component of memory-guided saccades in man. Exp. Brain Res. 95, 166–171 (1993).
pubmed: 8405249
doi: 10.1007/BF00229665
Steyvers, M. et al. High-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area reduces bimanual coupling during anti-phase but not in-phase movements. Exp. Brain Res. 151, 309–317 (2003).
pubmed: 12756517
doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1490-9
Euston, D. R., Gruber, A. J. & McNaughton, B. L. The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making. Neuron 76, 1057–1070 (2012).
pubmed: 23259943
pmcid: 3562704
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.002
Nemani, A. et al. Functional brain connectivity related to surgical skill dexterity in physical and virtual simulation environments. Neurophotonics 8 (2021).
Dutta, A. et al. Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity in the Primary Motor Cortex Distinguishes Between Training on a Physical and a Virtual Surgical Simulator. in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2021 (eds. de Bruijne, M. et al.) 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_61 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).
Straka, H., Simmers, J. & Chagnaud, B. P. A new perspective on predictive motor signaling. Curr. Biol. 28, R232–R243 (2018).
pubmed: 29510116
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.033
Koechlin, E., Ody, C. & Kouneiher, F. The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 302, 1181–1185 (2003).
pubmed: 14615530
doi: 10.1126/science.1088545
Jenkins, I. H., Brooks, D. J., Nixon, P. D., Frackowiak, R. S. J. & Passingham, R. E. Motor sequence learning: A study with positron emission tomography. J. Neurosci. 14, 3775–3790 (1994).
pubmed: 8207487
pmcid: 6576955
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-06-03775.1994
Bates, J. F. & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. Prefrontal connections of medial motor areas in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 336, 211–228 (1993).
pubmed: 7503997
doi: 10.1002/cne.903360205
Morecraft, R. J. & Van Hoesen, G. W. Frontal granular cortex input to the cingulate (M3), supplementary (M2) and primary (M1) motor cortices in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 337, 669–689 (1993).
pubmed: 8288777
doi: 10.1002/cne.903370411
Wilson, R. C., Bonawitz, E., Costa, V. D. & Ebitz, R. B. Balancing exploration and exploitation with information and randomization. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 38, 49–56 (2021).
pubmed: 33184605
doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.10.001
Badre, D. Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro–caudal organization of the frontal lobes. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 193–200 (2008).
pubmed: 18403252
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.004
Koechlin, E. & Summerfield, C. An information theoretical approach to prefrontal executive function. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 229–235 (2007).
pubmed: 17475536
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.005
Christoff, K. & Gabrieli, J. D. E. The frontopolar cortex and human cognition: Evidence for a rostrocaudal hierarchical organization within the human prefrontal cortex. Psychobiology 28, 168–186 (2000).
doi: 10.3758/BF03331976
Milner, A. D. How do the two visual streams interact with each other? Exp. Brain Res. 235, 1297–1308 (2017).
pubmed: 28255843
pmcid: 5380689
doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4917-4
Tanji, J., Okano, K. & Sato, K. C. Neuronal activity in cortical motor areas related to ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral digit movements of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 60, 325–343 (1988).
pubmed: 3404223
doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.1.325
Debaere, F., Wenderoth, N., Sunaert, S., Van Hecke, P. & Swinnen, S. P. Cerebellar and premotor function in bimanual coordination: parametric neural responses to spatiotemporal complexity and cycling frequency. Neuroimage 21, 1416–1427 (2004).
pubmed: 15050567
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.011
Makoshi, Z., Kroliczak, G. & van Donkelaar, P. Human supplementary motor area contribution to predictive motor planning. J. Mot. Behav. 43, 303–309 (2011).
pubmed: 21732868
doi: 10.1080/00222895.2011.584085
McCloskey, D. I. Corollary discharges: motor commands and perception. in Comprehensive Physiology 1415–1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.cp010232 (American Cancer Society, 2011).
Abe, M. et al. Functional coupling of human prefrontal and premotor areas during cognitive manipulation. J. Neurosci. 27, 3429–3438 (2007).
pubmed: 17392459
pmcid: 6672123
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4273-06.2007
Thorp, E. B., Kording, K. P. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Using noise to shape motor learning. J. Neurophysiol. 117, 728–737 (2017).
pubmed: 27881721
doi: 10.1152/jn.00493.2016
Wu, H. G., Miyamoto, Y. R., Castro, L. N. G., Ölveczky, B. P. & Smith, M. A. Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 312–321 (2014).
pubmed: 24413700
pmcid: 4442489
doi: 10.1038/nn.3616
Ranganathan, R. & Newell, K. M. Emergent flexibility in motor learning. Exp. Brain Res. 202, 755–764 (2010).
pubmed: 20151301
doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2177-7
Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M. & Yu, A. J. Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 362, 933–942 (2007).
pubmed: 17395573
pmcid: 2430007
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2098
Albouy, G. et al. Neural correlates of performance variability during motor sequence acquisition. Neuroimage 60, 324–331 (2012).
pubmed: 22227134
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.049
MacNeilage, P. F., Rogers, L. J. & Vallortigara, G. Origins of the left and right brain. Sci. Am. 301, 60–67 (2009).
pubmed: 19555025
doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0709-60
Kaller, C. P., Rahm, B., Spreer, J., Weiller, C. & Unterrainer, J. M. Dissociable contributions of left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in planning. Cereb. Cortex 21, 307–317 (2011).
pubmed: 20522540
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq096
Wen, W. et al. Perception and control: individual difference in the sense of agency is associated with learnability in sensorimotor adaptation. Sci. Rep. 11, 20542 (2021).
pubmed: 34654878
pmcid: 8519916
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99969-4
Walia, P., Kumar, K. N. & Dutta, A. Neuroimaging guided transcranial electrical stimulation in enhancing surgical skill acquisition. Comment on Hung et al. The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in enhancing surgical skill acquisition: a preliminary meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 707. Brain Sci. 11, 1078 (2021).
pubmed: 34439698
pmcid: 8395024
doi: 10.3390/brainsci11081078
Nakajima, R., Kinoshita, M., Shinohara, H. & Nakada, M. The superior longitudinal fascicle: reconsidering the fronto-parietal neural network based on anatomy and function. Brain Imaging Behav. 14, 2817–2830 (2020).
pubmed: 31468374
doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00187-4
Walia, P., Kamat, A., De, S. & Dutta, A. Dynamic causal modeling for EEG during complex laparoscopic skill acquisition. Neuroergonomics conference, Munich, Germany (2021). https://neuroergonomicsconference.um.ifi.lmu.de/wp-content/uploads/submissions/177.pdf .
Howells, H. et al. Frontoparietal tracts linked to lateralized hand preference and manual specialization. Cereb. Cortex 28, 2482 (2018).
pubmed: 29688293
pmcid: 6005057
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy040
Walia, P. et al. Neuroimaging guided tES to facilitate complex laparoscopic surgical tasks—insights from functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2021, 7437–7440 (2021).
Pascual-Diaz, S., Varriano, F., Pineda, J. & Prats-Galino, A. Structural characterization of the Extended Frontal Aslant Tract trajectory: a ML-validated laterality study in 3T and 7T. NeuroImage 222, 117260 (2020).
pubmed: 32798677
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117260
Catani, M. et al. Short frontal lobe connections of the human brain. Cortex 48, 273–291 (2012).
pubmed: 22209688
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.12.001
La Corte, E. et al. The frontal aslant tract: a systematic review for neurosurgical applications. Front. Neurol. 12, 51 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.641586
Spampinato, D. A., Celnik, P. A. & Rothwell, J. C. Cerebellar–motor cortex connectivity: one or two different networks? J. Neurosci. 40, 4230–4239 (2020).
pubmed: 32312885
pmcid: 7244200
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2397-19.2020
Li, Z. et al. Dynamic functional connectivity revealed by resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express 6, 2337 (2015).
pubmed: 26203365
pmcid: 4505693
doi: 10.1364/BOE.6.002337
Wang, Z. et al. Best window width determination and glioma analysis application of dynamic brain network measure on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Med. Imaging Health Inform. 6, 1735–1740 (2016).
doi: 10.1166/jmihi.2016.1881
Schwartze, M., Rothermich, K. & Kotz, S. A. Functional dissociation of pre-SMA and SMA-proper in temporal processing. NeuroImage 60, 290–298 (2012).
pubmed: 22178297
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.089
Linsk, A. M. et al. Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study. Surg. Endosc. 32, 1990–2002 (2018).
pubmed: 29052071
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5895-0
Aasted, C. M. et al. Anatomical guidance for functional near-infrared spectroscopy: AtlasViewer tutorial. Neurophotonics 2 (2015).
Jahani, S., Setarehdan, S. K., Boas, D. A. & Yücel, M. A. Motion artifact detection and correction in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a new hybrid method based on spline interpolation method and Savitzky–Golay filtering. Neurophotonics 5 (2018).
Dhamala, M., Rangarajan, G. & Ding, M. Estimating granger causality from fourier and wavelet transforms of time series data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 018701 (2008).
pubmed: 18232831
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.018701
Geweke, J. Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77, 304–313 (1982).
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1982.10477803
Leonardi, N. & Van De Ville, D. On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest. Neuroimage 104, 430–436 (2015).
pubmed: 25234118
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.007
Auer, D. P. Spontaneous low-frequency blood oxygenation level-dependent fluctuations and functional connectivity analysis of the ‘resting’ brain. Magn. Reson. Imaging 26, 1055–1064 (2008).
pubmed: 18657923
doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.008
Richardson, J. T. E. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educ. Res. Rev. 6, 135–147 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001