Spatial Olfactory Memory and Spatial Olfactory Navigation, Assessed with a Variant of Corsi Test, Is Modulated by Gender and Sporty Activity.
Corsi Block Tapping Test
olfaction
physical activity
spatial memory
spatial olfactory navigation
spatial representation
sport
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Aug 2022
19 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
29
05
2022
revised:
13
08
2022
accepted:
17
08
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many studies have focused on navigation, spatial skills, and the olfactory system in comparative models, including those concerning the relationship between them and physical activity. Although the results are often in contrast with each other, it is assumed that physical activity can affect cognition in different ways-both indirectly and through a certain influence on some brain structures. In contrast, there is little research that focuses on the relationship between spatial abilities and olfactory abilities in humans. This research aimed to evaluate and compare the performance in working memory tasks of athletes and non-athletes who require good visual-spatial navigation, olfactory-spatial navigation, and olfactory-semantic skills. The study involved 236 participants (83 athletes) between the ages of 18 and 40. All subjects were matched by age or sex. The standard Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT) was administrated to investigate the visual-spatial memory. Olfactory-spatial navigation and olfactory-semantic skills were assessed with two modified versions of CBTT: Olfactory CBTT (OCBTT) and Semantic-Olfactory CBTT (SOCBTT) respectively. The results show differences between the CORSI conditions in direction of a poor performance for athletes. A gender effect in favor of men was also found, particularly in the classic version of the CBTT. Both groups performed better in the classic version of the CBTT than OCBTT and SOCBTT. The mean of SOCBTT results is markedly lower, perhaps due to the different information processing systems needed to perform this kind of task. It is possible to explain how sports practice can affect tasks that require spatial skills and olfactory perception differently, thus supporting new hypotheses and opening new scientific horizons.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36009170
pii: brainsci12081108
doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081108
pmc: PMC9406228
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Dec;97(3 Pt 1):1007-10
pubmed: 14738372
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 13;284(1868):
pubmed: 29187623
Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Jan 14;13:87
pubmed: 32009912
Chem Senses. 2009 Jul;34(6):513-21
pubmed: 19477953
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Sep;16(9):1188-90
pubmed: 23912946
BMJ. 2017 Jun 22;357:j2709
pubmed: 28642251
J Aging Res. 2013;2013:657508
pubmed: 24102028
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;12(10):388-96
pubmed: 18760955
Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 27;3:304
pubmed: 22969737
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Jun 18;388:112646
pubmed: 32344039
Behav Processes. 2015 Feb;111:42-50
pubmed: 25464337
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2013 Jun 17;9(2):92-8
pubmed: 23833695
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Sep 13;10:272
pubmed: 30271339
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Nov;61(11):1166-70
pubmed: 17167157
Behav Neurosci. 2003 Jun;117(3):412-25
pubmed: 12802871
Neurol Sci. 2008 Sep;29(4):209-17
pubmed: 18810594
Hippocampus. 2009 Oct;19(10):1030-9
pubmed: 19123237
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017 Oct;17:84-89
pubmed: 29130062
J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 28;8(7):
pubmed: 31261796
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109 Suppl 1:10693-700
pubmed: 22723365
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0129387
pubmed: 26083337
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 24;12:629827
pubmed: 34248737
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2010 May;30(4):493-503
pubmed: 20041290
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 May;22(5):824-36
pubmed: 19400683
J Exp Biol. 2013 Aug 1;216(Pt 15):2798-805
pubmed: 23842626
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Oct 26;20(11):1504-1513
pubmed: 29073650
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1520-37
pubmed: 23565781
Front Neurosci. 2015 Oct 27;9:402
pubmed: 26578863
Nature. 2003 Sep 11;425(6954):184-8
pubmed: 12968182
Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;43(11):e12798
pubmed: 31742755
Neurobiol Aging. 2006 Jul;27(7):965-72
pubmed: 15982787
Physiol Behav. 2002 Jun 1;76(2):251-6
pubmed: 12044597
Clin J Sport Med. 2008 Nov;18(6):486-500
pubmed: 19001882
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Dec;141(3):281-303
pubmed: 11715073
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 16;9(1):4162
pubmed: 30327469
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9016924
pubmed: 28271072
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jan 2;168(1):30-38
pubmed: 29255839
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):3017-22
pubmed: 21282661
Ital J Neurol Sci. 1987 Dec;8(6):539-48
pubmed: 3429213
Neuron. 2019 Jun 5;102(5):1066-1075.e5
pubmed: 31023509
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):208-27
pubmed: 23229443
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Apr 1;117(4):1785-1796
pubmed: 28148640
Br Med Bull. 1971 Sep;27(3):272-7
pubmed: 4937273
Sports Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):29-44
pubmed: 28940148