Rumen Fermentation and Microbiome Responses to Enzymatic Hydrolysate of Cottonseed Protein Supplementation in Continuous In Vitro Culture.
enzymatic hydrolysate of cottonseed protein
gas production
in vitro fermentation
microbial diversity
rumen fermentation characteristics
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Aug 2022
18 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
08
07
2022
revised:
28
07
2022
accepted:
15
08
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of enzymatic hydrolysate of cottonseed protein (ECP) on the kinetic of gas production, rumen fermentation characteristics, and microbial diversity in continuous in vitro culture with a single factorial design of supplementation with various concentrations of ECP or yeast culture. Treatments were control (without supplementation, CON), supplementation with 10 g/kg Diamond-V XP yeast culture of substrate (XP), and supplementation with 6, 12 and 18 g/kg ECP of substrate (ECP1, ECP2, ECP3), each incubated with 30 mL of buffered incubation fluids and 200 mg of fermentation substrate in graduated glass syringes fitted with plungers for 48 h. Compared with the CON treatment, supplementation of XP yeast culture increased the cumulative gas production at 12 and 24 h, the concentration of ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration at 24 and 36 h, the concentration of microbial protein (MCP) concentration at 24 and 48 h, the molar butyrate proportion at 12, 24, and 48 h, the molar valerate proportion at 48 h, and the ratio of non-glucogenic to glucogenic acids (p < 0.05). Compared with the CON treatment, the concentration of MCP and the molar propionate proportion at 12 h were higher in the ECP1 treatment (p < 0.05); the cumulative gas production at 2, 4, and 12 h, the concentration of NH3-N at 36 h and the molar valerate proportion at 48 h were higher in the ECP2 treatment (p < 0.05); the cumulative gas production at 2, 12, and 48 h, the concentration of NH3-N at 12 and 36 h, the concentration of MCP at 12, 36, and 48 h, the molar butyrate proportion at 12 and 48 h, and the molar valerate proportion at 48 h were higher in the ECP3 treatment (p < 0.05). Compared with the CON treatment, supplementation with XP yeast culture significantly altered the relative abundance of the phyla Firmicutes, Kiritimatiellaeota, and Proteobacteria, while supplementation with ECP had minimal effect on bacterial diversity. The prediction of bacterial functions showed that the main gene functions of rumen bacteria are associated with carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and membrane transport. The findings of this study suggest that ECP can be used as a superior feed ingredient for ruminants, the suitable level of ECP was 18 g/kg in vitro experiment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36009704
pii: ani12162113
doi: 10.3390/ani12162113
pmc: PMC9405472
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Chengdu Mytech Biotech Co., Ltd.
ID : no
Références
Bioinformatics. 2015 Sep 1;31(17):2882-4
pubmed: 25957349
Adv Appl Microbiol. 2020;111:89-121
pubmed: 32446413
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jan;77(1):138-47
pubmed: 21057019
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Apr;132(4):2583-2593
pubmed: 34847280
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014 May;27(5):658-66
pubmed: 25050000
J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3231-61
pubmed: 24746124
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
mSystems. 2018 Aug 7;3(4):
pubmed: 30116788
Front Microbiol. 2022 May 27;13:851567
pubmed: 35711780
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2000 Dec 1;232(1):198-206
pubmed: 11071750
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003 Dec;27(5):663-93
pubmed: 14638418
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 02;7:43412
pubmed: 28252026
AMB Express. 2021 Jun 22;11(1):91
pubmed: 34156579
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 1;26(11):1463-4
pubmed: 20395285
Mol Gen Genet. 1992 May;233(1-2):284-92
pubmed: 1603069
World Rev Nutr Diet. 1975;22:152-82
pubmed: 1103481
J Anim Sci. 1992 May;70(5):1628-38
pubmed: 1526930
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Sep;95(9):5127-5132
pubmed: 22916918
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2007 Sep;58(6):486-90
pubmed: 17710592
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jan 4;87(2):
pubmed: 33097510
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
Br J Nutr. 1999 Aug;82(2):149-57
pubmed: 10743487
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013 Apr;45(4):987-93
pubmed: 23224950
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 Apr;76(1):49-63
pubmed: 21223325
Reprod Domest Anim. 2014 Dec;49(6):947-53
pubmed: 25251226
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2020;21(8):812-820
pubmed: 32013830
Mol Biol Rep. 2015 Jan;42(1):95-103
pubmed: 25249226
Food Chem. 2021 Aug 1;352:129399
pubmed: 33662918
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Feb;93(2):682-92
pubmed: 20105539
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jun;103(6):5102-5117
pubmed: 32253042
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63
pubmed: 21903629
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013 Feb;83(2):504-14
pubmed: 22974422
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Mar;101(3):2335-2349
pubmed: 29331466
J Anim Sci. 2000 Jan;78(1):158-66
pubmed: 10682817
Anim Sci J. 2011 Apr;82(2):198-208
pubmed: 21729196
Toxics. 2021 Mar 08;9(3):
pubmed: 33800444
Food Nutr Res. 2008;52:
pubmed: 19109654
Benef Microbes. 2020 Feb 19;11(1):91-99
pubmed: 32066261
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013 Oct;63(Pt 10):3920-3926
pubmed: 24097834
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Apr;90(4):1887-903
pubmed: 17369230
Microorganisms. 2021 Feb 09;9(2):
pubmed: 33572291
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Dec;99(15):6751-6760
pubmed: 31353469
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 May;75(1):165-74
pubmed: 17235560
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013 Jan;26(1):72-81
pubmed: 25049708
J Anim Sci. 2008 May;86(5):1164-72
pubmed: 18203979
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 04;10(12):
pubmed: 33291840
Bioinformatics. 2012 Aug 15;28(16):2106-13
pubmed: 22711789
Br J Nutr. 2002 Jul;88(1):73-80
pubmed: 12117430
BMC Vet Res. 2021 Sep 9;17(1):304
pubmed: 34503491
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017 Mar 7;8:24
pubmed: 28286649
Anim Nutr. 2021 Dec;7(4):967-972
pubmed: 34703914
J Dairy Sci. 1982 Nov;65(11):2170-3
pubmed: 7153399
J Anim Sci. 1996 Feb;74(2):483-91
pubmed: 8690686
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Aug;85(8):2009-14
pubmed: 12214993
Ultrason Sonochem. 2020 May;63:104957
pubmed: 31945572