Evaluation of
Russian sturgeon
cryopreservation
fertilization rate
morphology
semen evaluation
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Aug 2022
22 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
07
07
2022
revised:
18
08
2022
accepted:
20
08
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The alarming decline in sturgeon populations doubled by growing demands for sturgeon products, urge us to prevent the loss of these species. Fish stocking in natural habitats and developing fish farms are viable solutions, which can be successfully implemented with the help of reproductive biotechnologies. Despite the fact that semen cryopreservation is admittedly an important step for saving the Russian sturgeon, a reproducible standard method with good results has yet to be identified. Sperm quality assessment is essential for quantifying the impact of cryopreservation on spermatozoa. The purpose of our study was to provide additional information regarding semen cryopreservation and semen quality evaluation for the Russian sturgeon. Our study method is based on the use of two yolk-free extenders (with different cryoprotectants: DMSO and methanol) for freezing semen, using a simple freezing protocol. Parameters such as volume, concentration, motility, morphology and membrane integrity were evaluated. In conclusion, cryopreservation of Russian sturgeon spermatozoa using an extender containing methanol as cryoprotectant led to high egg fertilization percentages (72.67 ± 5.4%) even if the total motility values recorded for thawed semen were quite low (18-25%). Additionally, we identified two optimal stains for morphological studies and morphometry (Spermac stain kit and Trypan Blue Solution).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36009743
pii: ani12162153
doi: 10.3390/ani12162153
pmc: PMC9405347
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding
ID : 182/2014
Références
Cryobiology. 2016 Apr;72(2):112-8
pubmed: 26929990
Reproduction. 2002 Nov;124(5):713-9
pubmed: 12417010
Reprod Domest Anim. 2011 Apr;46(2):247-52
pubmed: 20546171
Cryo Letters. 2021 May-Jun;42(3):129-136
pubmed: 33970990
Cryobiology. 2015 Apr;70(2):170-4
pubmed: 25707696
Anim Reprod Sci. 2013 Jun;139(1-4):127-35
pubmed: 23602487
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 21;23(6):
pubmed: 35328812
Theriogenology. 2019 Sep 15;136:143-165
pubmed: 31265944
Theriogenology. 2017 Jul 15;97:134-138
pubmed: 28583596
Reproduction. 2004 Dec;128(6):819-28
pubmed: 15579600
Cryobiology. 2008 Jun;56(3):251-3
pubmed: 18466892
Theriogenology. 2002 Jan 1;57(1):327-44
pubmed: 11775978
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010 Feb 1;165(3):535-48
pubmed: 19272390
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 16;13(8):e0202514
pubmed: 30114243
Ann Anat. 2004 Apr;186(2):99-113
pubmed: 15125039
Theriogenology. 2019 Sep 1;135:94-108
pubmed: 31203093
Anim Reprod Sci. 2016 Jan;164:82-9
pubmed: 26633858
Reprod Domest Anim. 2013 Dec;48(6):1013-8
pubmed: 23879448