Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism during Pregnancy.
D-dimer
clinical probability
computed tomography pulmonary angiography
diagnostic strategy
pregnancy
pulmonary embolism
ventilation-perfusion lung scan
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Aug 2022
03 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
07
06
2022
revised:
26
07
2022
accepted:
28
07
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although rare, pulmonary embolism (PE) remains one of the most common causes of severe maternal morbidity and mortality during pregnancy. Among pregnant women with suspected PE, the prevalence of confirmed disease is far lower than in the general population, reflecting the fear of missing the diagnosis and a low threshold to suspect PE in this setting. Two prospective management outcome trials have recently assessed two different diagnostic algorithms based on the assessment of clinical probability, D-dimer, venous compression ultrasonography of the lower limbs (CUS), and computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Both demonstrated the safety of such strategies to exclude PE, with a very low failure rate defined as the rate of subsequent 3-month venous thromboembolism in women left untreated after a negative work-up. These studies were also the first to prospectively demonstrate the safety of negative D-dimer associated with a clinical prediction rule to exclude PE without any chest imaging. Pregnant women are known to be a subgroup at particularly high risk of inappropriate diagnostic management, so the implementation of such validated diagnostic strategies in clinical practice should represent a high priority goal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36010225
pii: diagnostics12081875
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081875
pmc: PMC9406738
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 4;169(11):766-773
pubmed: 30357273
Br J Haematol. 2001 Oct;115(1):150-2
pubmed: 11722426
JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1117-24
pubmed: 24643601
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020 Dec 4;2020(1):184-189
pubmed: 33275675
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 21;151(2):85-92
pubmed: 19620161
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Feb 7;144(3):157-64
pubmed: 16461959
Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):500-12
pubmed: 19889451
J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Aug;17(8):1329-1334
pubmed: 31108013
Circulation. 2021 May 4;143(18):1828-1830
pubmed: 33939529
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 May;16(5):876-885
pubmed: 29450965
Thromb Res. 2017 Sep;157:23-28
pubmed: 28686913
Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3226-3256
pubmed: 30482764
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov 15;184(10):1200-8
pubmed: 22086989
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 21;41(4):543-603
pubmed: 31504429
J Thromb Haemost. 2021 Oct;19(10):2454-2467
pubmed: 34161671
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Feb;52(1):14-22
pubmed: 21972999
Thromb Res. 2019 May;177:172-179
pubmed: 30921536
Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):886-92
pubmed: 19404542
BJOG. 2015 Feb;122(3):395-400
pubmed: 24828148
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2016;14(4):495-503
pubmed: 26691634
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1139-1149
pubmed: 30893534
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Nov;197(5):1058-63
pubmed: 22021496
BJOG. 2019 Feb;126(3):383-392
pubmed: 29782079
JAMA. 1990 May 23-30;263(20):2753-9
pubmed: 2332918
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 May;15(5):1040-1043
pubmed: 28296048
BMJ. 2012 Apr 24;344:e2635
pubmed: 22531869
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1307-15
pubmed: 24524551
J Thromb Haemost. 2021 Dec;19(12):3044-3050
pubmed: 34496121
Br J Haematol. 2018 Mar;180(5):694-704
pubmed: 29359796
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Nov 15;143(10):697-706
pubmed: 16287790
Arch Intern Med. 2002 May 27;162(10):1170-5
pubmed: 12020189
Haematologica. 2019 Jan;104(1):176-188
pubmed: 30115658
BJOG. 2011 Mar;118 Suppl 1:1-203
pubmed: 21356004
Lancet. 2017 Jul 15;390(10091):289-297
pubmed: 28549662