An Experimental and Virtual Approach to Hip Revision Prostheses.
finite element method
hip joint
human hip revision
prostheses
virtual test
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Aug 2022
12 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
12
07
2022
revised:
08
08
2022
accepted:
10
08
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Introduction: The changes in the joint morphology inevitably lead to prosthesis, but the hip pathology is complex. The hip arthroplasty is a therapeutic solution and can be caused, most frequently, by primary and secondary coxarthrosis due to or followed by traumatic conditions. The main aim of this study was to find the method of revision hip prosthesis that preserves as much bone material as possible and has sufficiently good mechanical strength. (2) Materials and Methods: In this study, in a first step, the two revision prostheses were performed on bone components taken from an animal (cow), and then, they were tested on a mechanical testing machine until the prostheses physically failed, and the force causing their failure was determined. (3) Results: These prostheses were then modelled in a virtual environment and tested using the finite element method (FEM) in order to determine their behaviour under loading from normal human gait. Displacement, strain, and stress maps were obtained. (4) Discussion: Discussions on hip revision prostheses, method, and theory analysis are presented at the end of the paper. (5) Conclusions: Important conclusions are drawn based on comparative analyses. The main conclusion shows that the both orthopaedic prostheses provide a very good resistance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36010302
pii: diagnostics12081952
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081952
pmc: PMC9406961
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Int Orthop. 2017 Aug;41(8):1527-1533
pubmed: 28012048
J Biomech. 1991;24(8):691-8
pubmed: 1918092
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2021 Jan;235(1):17-27
pubmed: 32811293
Biomaterials. 1993 Apr;14(5):337-40
pubmed: 8507776
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Oct;26(7):1061-6
pubmed: 21676579
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Dec;136(12):1741-1752
pubmed: 27704204
Curr Health Sci J. 2022 Jan-Mar;48(1):57-62
pubmed: 35911946
Int Orthop. 2008 Oct;32(5):597-604
pubmed: 17443324
J Biomech. 1992 May;25(5):469-76
pubmed: 1592852
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Sep;72(5):757-60
pubmed: 2211749
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):1918-21
pubmed: 17703000
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May;446:22-8
pubmed: 16672867
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2005;46(4):279-81
pubmed: 16688363
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152663
pubmed: 27031836
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 23;12(5):
pubmed: 35626452
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Sep 6;9(25):7605-7613
pubmed: 34616833
N Engl J Med. 1990 Sep 13;323(11):725-31
pubmed: 2201916
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:864389
pubmed: 25879077
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2021 Sep;235(9):985-992
pubmed: 34137316
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2672-2676
pubmed: 27546470
J Biomech. 1983;16(6):385-409
pubmed: 6352706
Eur J Transl Myol. 2021 Mar 09;31(1):
pubmed: 33709655
Curr Health Sci J. 2021 Apr-Jun;47(2):249-255
pubmed: 34765245
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jul;58(5):612-8
pubmed: 932060
Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:943839
pubmed: 26798405
J Orthop Res. 1984;2(2):105-18
pubmed: 6491806
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug;(413):175-82
pubmed: 12897608
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Apr;141(4):683-691
pubmed: 33417021
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Oct 14;10(10):
pubmed: 33066350
Comput Math Methods Med. 2016;2016:6183679
pubmed: 27051460
Eur J Transl Myol. 2022 Jun 28;32(2):
pubmed: 35766481
Eur J Transl Myol. 2021 Jul 12;31(3):
pubmed: 34251162
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5
pubmed: 17403800
Hip. 1981;:3-14
pubmed: 7037693
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Apr;29(3):717-723
pubmed: 30317469
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 25;22(13):
pubmed: 35808309