Preneoplastic Lesions in Surgical Specimens Do Not Worsen the Prognosis of Patients Who Underwent Surgery for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Post-Hoc Analysis of the PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA 6 Trial.
IPMN
MCN
PanIN
dysplasia
pancreatic cancer
surgery
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Aug 2022
16 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
27
06
2022
revised:
07
08
2022
accepted:
13
08
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prognosis of pancreatic cancer after curative surgery is burdened by frequent recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of dysplasia in the surgical specimen on disease-free survival (DFS). A post-hoc analysis of the phase III PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA 6 trial was performed. From April 2012 to October 2016, 493 patients were included in the primary study. Assessment for dysplasia in the surgical specimens was secondarily performed. Dysplasia was defined based on presence and grade of three most common pre-malignant lesions (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). The primary endpoint was DFS validated through multivariate analysis. Two hundred twenty-six patients (45.9%) had a preneoplastic lesion. PanIN lesions were found in 193 patients (39.2%), including 100 high-grade lesions (20.6%); 43 patients had IPMN lesions (8.7%), including high-grade lesions in 32 (6.5%). Three MCN were described (0.6%). In bivariate analysis, the presence of dysplasia was not associated with poorer DFS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.66; 1.03]). In multivariate analysis, risk factors for poorer DFS were poorly differentiated/undifferentiated tumor, N1 status, R1 surgical margins and perineural invasion. The presence of dysplasia in the surgical specimen after pancreatic cancer surgery does not worsen DFS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36010938
pii: cancers14163945
doi: 10.3390/cancers14163945
pmc: PMC9406034
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Ann Surg. 2011 May;253(5):968-74
pubmed: 21422912
JAMA Surg. 2019 Nov 1;154(11):1038-1048
pubmed: 31483448
Pancreatology. 2002;2(5):484-90
pubmed: 12378117
Biosci Trends. 2015 Dec;9(6):402-6
pubmed: 26781798
J Surg Oncol. 2000 Apr;73(4):212-8
pubmed: 10797334
Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):74-85
pubmed: 12496533
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Dec;39(12):1730-41
pubmed: 26559377
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):952
pubmed: 31615457
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 20;32(6):504-12
pubmed: 24419109
Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):644-51; discussion 651-4
pubmed: 17893501
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 20;379(25):2395-2406
pubmed: 30575490
Gut. 2018 Sep;67(9):1652-1662
pubmed: 29500184
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):1039-49
pubmed: 25207767
Pancreatology. 2017 Sep - Oct;17(5):738-753
pubmed: 28735806
Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):495-506
pubmed: 26743012
JAMA. 2013 Oct 9;310(14):1473-81
pubmed: 24104372
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(6):1746-1751
pubmed: 29560572
Gastroenterology. 2012 Apr;142(4):796-804; quiz e14-5
pubmed: 22245846
Gut. 2018 May;67(5):789-804
pubmed: 29574408
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33
pubmed: 35020204
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e214708
pubmed: 33825840
JAMA. 2010 Sep 8;304(10):1073-81
pubmed: 20823433
Radiographics. 2022 Jan-Feb;42(1):87-105
pubmed: 34855543
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Oct;15(10):814-21
pubmed: 23782351
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:474905
pubmed: 24783207
Dig Liver Dis. 2022 Jun;54(6):826-833
pubmed: 34219044
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 08;13(24):
pubmed: 34944807
Dig Surg. 2012;29(3):213-25
pubmed: 22677789
Pancreas. 2011 May;40(4):571-80
pubmed: 21499212
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;48(6):1309-1320
pubmed: 34920899
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Mar;8(1):17-36
pubmed: 10347858