Comparative Efficacy of Tapentadol versus Tapentadol Plus Duloxetine in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): A Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.

chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy duloxetine tapentadol

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 14 07 2022
revised: 13 08 2022
accepted: 15 08 2022
entrez: 26 8 2022
pubmed: 27 8 2022
medline: 27 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common complication due to treatment with many commonly used anti-cancer agents. CIPN is a mainly sensory neuropathy that can be characterized by the appearance of motor and autonomic alterations. Clinicians may offer duloxetine (DLX) for patients with cancer experiencing CIPN. Our aim was to assess the non-inferiority of the analgesic effect and safety of tapentadol (TP) alone compared to duloxetine plus tapentadol administered to patients with CIPN. A total of 114 patients were enrolled in the study and randomized to receive tapentadol in a dosage of 50 to 500 mg/day (n = 56) or tapentadol plus duloxetine in a dosage of 60 to 120 mg/day (n = 58) for a period of 4 weeks. We evaluated the analgesia efficacy, defined as a decrease in pain on the NRS between the first administration and 28 days later. Secondary endpoints included analgesia efficacy at 28 and 42 days, defined by a decrease in DN4 and LEPs, decrease in quality of life, and the incidence of any serious or non-serious adverse events after the first administration. In this randomized, double-blind trial comparing TP and TP plus DLX for CIPN management, TP was feasible and non-inferior to the association with DLX as far as the reduction of pain after chemotherapy at 28 days is concerned. Scores on other rating scales evaluating the quality of life, anxiety and depression, and the characteristics of pain revealed similar improvements associated with tapentadol versus duloxetine at these time points. The use of TP is a safe and effective analgesic therapy in patients with CIPN. Positive effects of TP were noted on the patients' quality-of-life assessments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36010995
pii: cancers14164002
doi: 10.3390/cancers14164002
pmc: PMC9406344
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Eur J Neurol. 2010 Aug;17(8):1010-8
pubmed: 20298428
Ann Neurol. 2017 Jun;81(6):772-781
pubmed: 28486769
Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;57:101-10
pubmed: 16106611
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;107(4):619-26
pubmed: 21724620
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jan;140(1):176-83
pubmed: 26556766
Pain Physician. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):E195-200
pubmed: 25794219
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 22;20(6):
pubmed: 30909387
Curr Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(4):174-80
pubmed: 25089099
Brain Behav. 2019 Jun;9(6):e01312
pubmed: 31063261
Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Aug;40(7):872-82
pubmed: 24830939
J Pain Res. 2019 May 16;12:1569-1576
pubmed: 31190968
Eur J Pain. 2010 Sep;14(8):781-3
pubmed: 20659810
Neurophysiol Clin. 2012 Oct;42(5):345-53
pubmed: 23040705
CNS Drugs. 2014 Apr;28(4):319-29
pubmed: 24578192
Pain. 2011 Jan;152(1):14-27
pubmed: 20851519
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804
pubmed: 16000093
Eur J Cancer. 2005 May;41(8):1135-9
pubmed: 15911236
Neurol Sci. 2015 Dec;36(12):2169-75
pubmed: 26410087
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Aug;119(8):1705-1719
pubmed: 18486546
J Pain Res. 2019 May 16;12:1537-1551
pubmed: 31190965
Pain. 2005 Mar;114(1-2):29-36
pubmed: 15733628
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987 Dec;15(6):657-80
pubmed: 3450848
Neurophysiol Clin. 2012 Jun;42(4):187-97
pubmed: 22632867
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1941-67
pubmed: 24733808
J Pain. 2017 Mar;18(3):233-246
pubmed: 27884691
Neurol Sci. 2017 Oct;38(10):1747-1752
pubmed: 28699105
JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2594-604
pubmed: 23268518
Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2461-2470
pubmed: 25261162

Auteurs

Pasquale Sansone (P)

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.

Luca Gregorio Giaccari (LG)

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.

Caterina Aurilio (C)

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.

Francesco Coppolino (F)

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.

Maria Beatrice Passavanti (MB)

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.

Vincenzo Pota (V)

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.

Maria Caterina Pace (MC)

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.

Classifications MeSH