Effect of a 3-Week Multidisciplinary Body Weight Reduction Program on the Epigenetic Age Acceleration in Obese Adults.
DNA methylation
age-related diseases
biological age
body weight reduction program
epigenetic age acceleration
obesity
obesity-related diseases
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Aug 2022
10 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
23
06
2022
revised:
02
08
2022
accepted:
08
08
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Obesity and aging share common molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), which occur frequently in both conditions. DNA methylation (DNAm) age, a biomarker of the epigenetic clock, has been proposed as a more accurate predictor of biological aging than chronological age. A positive difference between an individual’s chronological age and DNAm age is referred to as epigenetic age acceleration. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a 3-week in-hospital body weight reduction program (BWRP) on the epigenetic age acceleration, as well as on other cardiometabolic outcomes, in a cohort of 72 obese adults (F/M: 43/29; (chronological) age: 51.5 ± 14.5 yrs; BMI: 46.5 ± 6.3 kg/m2). At the end of the BWRP, when considering the entire population, BMI decreased, and changes in body composition were observed. The BWRP also produced beneficial metabolic effects as demonstrated by decreases in glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol. A post-BWRP improvement in cardiovascular function was also evident (i.e., decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate). The BWRP reduced some markers of systemic inflammation, particularly C-reactive protein (CRP). Finally, vascular age (VA) and Framingham risk score (FRS) were reduced after the BWRP. When considering the entire population, DNAm age and epigenetic age acceleration did not differ after the BWRP. However, when subdividing the population into two groups based on each subject’s epigenetic age acceleration (i.e., ≤0 yrs or >0 yrs), the BWRP reduced the epigenetic age acceleration only in obese subjects with a value > 0 yrs (thus biologically older than expected). Among all the single demographic, lifestyle, biochemical, and clinical characteristics investigated, only some markers of systemic inflammation, such as CRP, were associated with the epigenetic age acceleration. Moreover, chronological age was correlated with DNAm age and VA; finally, there was a correlation between DNAm age and VA. In conclusion, a 3-week BWRP is capable of reducing the epigenetic age acceleration in obese adults, being the BWRP-induced rejuvenation evident in subjects with an epigenetic age acceleration > 0 yrs. Based on the BWRP-induced decrease in CRP levels, chronic systemic inflammation seems to play a role in mediating obesity-related epigenetic remodeling and biological aging. Thus, due to the strong association of CVD risk with the epigenetic clock and morbidity/mortality, any effort should be made to reduce the low-grade chronic inflammatory state in obesity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36012914
pii: jcm11164677
doi: 10.3390/jcm11164677
pmc: PMC9410133
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Italian Ministry of Health
ID : NA
Références
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jan;23(1):57-63
pubmed: 10857969
Obes Rev. 2020 Apr;21(4):e12991
pubmed: 32020741
Clin Epigenetics. 2019 Dec 2;11(1):172
pubmed: 31791395
Science. 2010 Apr 16;328(5976):321-6
pubmed: 20395504
Aging (Albany NY). 2017 Feb 14;9(2):419-446
pubmed: 28198702
Clin Epigenetics. 2021 Mar 4;13(1):48
pubmed: 33663610
Nutrients. 2020 May 21;12(5):
pubmed: 32455545
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Jan;75 Suppl:S3-8; discussion S8-9
pubmed: 10959208
Nat Rev Immunol. 2011 Aug 05;11(9):607-15
pubmed: 21818123
J Endocrinol Invest. 2020 Oct;43(10):1373-1389
pubmed: 32358737
Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):645-657
pubmed: 31424985
Clin Epigenetics. 2021 Mar 16;13(1):55
pubmed: 33726838
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Jul;17:173-179
pubmed: 26026729
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Jun;19(6):371-384
pubmed: 29643443
Nutrients. 2019 May 31;11(6):
pubmed: 31159183
Circulation. 2008 Feb 12;117(6):743-53
pubmed: 18212285
Genome Biol. 2017 Mar 28;18(1):57
pubmed: 28351423
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 28;111(43):15538-43
pubmed: 25313081
Aging Cell. 2016 Feb;15(1):149-54
pubmed: 26594032
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Dec 12;73(1):39-47
pubmed: 28510637
Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(18):2950-77
pubmed: 24079773
JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):187-93
pubmed: 12517229
Diseases. 2021 Nov 29;9(4):
pubmed: 34940025
Circulation. 2009 Oct 20;120(16):1640-5
pubmed: 19805654
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e73480
pubmed: 23977389
Nutrients. 2020 Jan 13;12(1):
pubmed: 31941135
Postgrad Med. 2009 Nov;121(6):21-33
pubmed: 19940414
Exp Gerontol. 2018 May;105:47-52
pubmed: 29032243
Genome Biol. 2016 Dec 12;17(1):255
pubmed: 27955697
Prev Med. 2017 Jul;100:145-151
pubmed: 28450121
Aging (Albany NY). 2016 Sep 28;8(9):1844-1865
pubmed: 27690265
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001 Oct;55(10):865-9
pubmed: 11593348
Food Chem Toxicol. 2011 Dec;49(12):3104-11
pubmed: 22001172
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 May 03;10:266
pubmed: 31130916
Dose Response. 2010 Jan 28;8(1):73-9
pubmed: 20221295
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Apr 12;13(7):9419-9432
pubmed: 33844651
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 17;10:496
pubmed: 31379754
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(9):601-7
pubmed: 18584293
Int J Prev Med. 2018 Jun 29;9:58
pubmed: 30050669
NPJ Genom Med. 2021 Jun 11;6(1):46
pubmed: 34117263
PLoS Genet. 2013 Jun;9(6):e1003572
pubmed: 23825961
Clin Epigenetics. 2018 Dec 20;10(1):159
pubmed: 30572949
Ageing Res Rev. 2021 May;67:101268
pubmed: 33556548