3D-Printing to Plan Complex Transcatheter Paravalvular Leaks Closure.

3D printing interventional cardiology multimodality imaging paravalvular leak percutaneous prosthetic valve transcatheter

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 29 06 2022
revised: 03 08 2022
accepted: 08 08 2022
entrez: 26 8 2022
pubmed: 27 8 2022
medline: 27 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leak (PVL) has emerged as an alternative to surgical management in selected cases. Achieving complete PVL occlusion, while respecting prosthesis function remains challenging. A multimodal imaging analysis of PVL morphology before and during the procedure is mandatory to select an appropriate device. We aim to explore the additional value of 3D printing in predicting device related adverse events including mechanical valve leaflet blockade, risk of device embolization and residual shunting. From the FFPP registries (NCT05089136 and NCT05117359), we included 11 transcatheter PVL closure procedures from three centers for which 3D printed models were produced. Cardiac CT was used for segmentation for 3D printed models (3D-heartmodeling, Caissargues, France). Technology used a laser to fuse very fine powders (TPU Thermoplastic polyurethane) into a final part-laser sintering technology (SLS) with an adapted elasticity. A simulation on 3D printed model was performed using a set of occluders. PVLs were located around aortic prostheses in six cases, mitral prostheses in four cases and tricuspid ring in one case. The device chosen during the simulation on the 3D printed model matched the one implanted in eight cases. In the three other cases, a similar device type was chosen during the procedures but with a different size. A risk of prosthesis leaflet blockade was identified on 3D printed models in four cases. During the procedure, the occluder was removed before release in one case. In another case the device was successfully repositioned and released. In two patients, leaflet impingement was observed post-operatively and surgical device removal had to be performed. In a case-series of complex transcatheter PVL closure procedures, hands-on simulation testing on 3D printed models proved its usefulness to plan and facilitate these challenging procedures.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leak (PVL) has emerged as an alternative to surgical management in selected cases. Achieving complete PVL occlusion, while respecting prosthesis function remains challenging. A multimodal imaging analysis of PVL morphology before and during the procedure is mandatory to select an appropriate device. We aim to explore the additional value of 3D printing in predicting device related adverse events including mechanical valve leaflet blockade, risk of device embolization and residual shunting.
METHODS METHODS
From the FFPP registries (NCT05089136 and NCT05117359), we included 11 transcatheter PVL closure procedures from three centers for which 3D printed models were produced. Cardiac CT was used for segmentation for 3D printed models (3D-heartmodeling, Caissargues, France). Technology used a laser to fuse very fine powders (TPU Thermoplastic polyurethane) into a final part-laser sintering technology (SLS) with an adapted elasticity. A simulation on 3D printed model was performed using a set of occluders.
RESULTS RESULTS
PVLs were located around aortic prostheses in six cases, mitral prostheses in four cases and tricuspid ring in one case. The device chosen during the simulation on the 3D printed model matched the one implanted in eight cases. In the three other cases, a similar device type was chosen during the procedures but with a different size. A risk of prosthesis leaflet blockade was identified on 3D printed models in four cases. During the procedure, the occluder was removed before release in one case. In another case the device was successfully repositioned and released. In two patients, leaflet impingement was observed post-operatively and surgical device removal had to be performed.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In a case-series of complex transcatheter PVL closure procedures, hands-on simulation testing on 3D printed models proved its usefulness to plan and facilitate these challenging procedures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36012997
pii: jcm11164758
doi: 10.3390/jcm11164758
pmc: PMC9410469
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Jun - Jul;111(6-7):421-431
pubmed: 29937207
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 25;69(16):2067-2087
pubmed: 28427582
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jul;10(7):719-731
pubmed: 28683947
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Sep - Oct;14(5):e66-e68
pubmed: 30930181
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Jun - Jul;111(6-7):411-420
pubmed: 29886007
JACC Case Rep. 2021 Dec 07;4(1):36-41
pubmed: 35036941
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 5;15(1):211
pubmed: 32758268
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2014 Aug;67(8):608-14
pubmed: 25037539
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Jul-Aug;8(4):323-7
pubmed: 25151924
Eur Heart J. 2020 Dec 7;41(46):4444-4445
pubmed: 32428931
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 2;77(4):450-500
pubmed: 33342587
Med Image Anal. 2021 Dec;74:102222
pubmed: 34543913
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jun 20;14(2):176-184
pubmed: 29537376
EuroIntervention. 2020 Feb 20;15(14):1251-1259
pubmed: 31422926
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;14(1):41-60
pubmed: 32861647
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Aug 19;23(10):138
pubmed: 34410510
EuroIntervention. 2017 Mar 20;12(16):1962-1968
pubmed: 27973334
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 15;58(21):2218-24
pubmed: 22078428
Circulation. 2016 Sep 27;134(13):934-44
pubmed: 27587432
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632
pubmed: 34453165
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Apr;72(4):342
pubmed: 29747943
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(1):120-122
pubmed: 31043995

Auteurs

Vlad Ciobotaru (V)

Structural and Valvular Unit, Hôpital Privé les Franciscaines, 7 Rue Jean Bouin, 30000 Nîmes, France.
Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm UMR-S 999, BME Lab, 133 Avenue de la Résistance, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France.

Victor-Xavier Tadros (VX)

Structural and Valvular Unit, Hôpital Privé les Franciscaines, 7 Rue Jean Bouin, 30000 Nîmes, France.

Marcos Batistella (M)

IMT, Mines Telecom Institute, 30319 Ales, France.

Eric Maupas (E)

Structural and Valvular Unit, Hôpital Privé les Franciscaines, 7 Rue Jean Bouin, 30000 Nîmes, France.

Romain Gallet (R)

Cardiology Unit, Hôpital Henri Mondor (AP-HP), 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France.

Benoit Decante (B)

Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm UMR-S 999, BME Lab, 133 Avenue de la Résistance, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France.

Emmanuel Lebret (E)

Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm UMR-S 999, BME Lab, 133 Avenue de la Résistance, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France.

Benoit Gerardin (B)

Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm UMR-S 999, BME Lab, 133 Avenue de la Résistance, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France.

Sebastien Hascoet (S)

Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm UMR-S 999, BME Lab, 133 Avenue de la Résistance, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France.

Classifications MeSH