Holter ECG for Syncope Evaluation in the Internal Medicine Department-Choosing the Right Patients.
ECG monitoring
Holter
arrhythmia
hospital
internal medicine
syncope
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Aug 2022
16 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
26
07
2022
revised:
10
08
2022
accepted:
14
08
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Physicians use Holter electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring to evaluate some patients with syncope in the internal medicine department. We questioned whether Holter ECG should be used in the presented setting. Included were all consecutive patients admitted with syncope to one of our nine internal medicine departments who had completed a 24 h Holter ECG between 2018 and 2021. A diagnostic Holter was defined as one which altered the patient’s treatment and met ESC/ACC/AHA diagnostic criteria. A total of 478 Holter tests were performed for syncope evaluation during admission to an internal medicine department in the study period. Of them, 25 patients (5.2%) had a diagnostic Holter finding. Sinus node dysfunction was the most frequent diagnostic recording (13 patients, 52%). In multivariant analysis, predictors for diagnostic Holter were older age (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.08−1.68), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.43−11.72), and shorter duration to Holter initiation (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56−0.96). There was a positive correlation between time from admission to Holter and hospital stay, r(479) = 0.342, p < 0.001. Our results suggest that completing a 24 h Holter monitoring during admission to the internal medicine department should be restricted to patients with a high pre-test probability to avoid overuse and possible harm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36013018
pii: jcm11164781
doi: 10.3390/jcm11164781
pmc: PMC9409720
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Europace. 2007 Dec;9(12):1196-201
pubmed: 17965013
Heart. 2008 Dec;94(12):1620-6
pubmed: 18519550
J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;47(1):113-8
pubmed: 24698512
Circulation. 1995 Oct 1;92(7):1819-24
pubmed: 7671366
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 1;127(1):76-86
pubmed: 9214258
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49(12):1068-75
pubmed: 21945976
Am Heart J. 2005 Nov;150(5):1065
pubmed: 16290999
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jan;27(1):76-82
pubmed: 16272210
Am J Med. 1991 Jan;90(1):91-106
pubmed: 1986595
Int J Cardiol. 2005 May 25;101(2):203-7
pubmed: 15882664
Heart Rhythm. 2009 Feb;6(2):238-43
pubmed: 19187918
Europace. 2002 Oct;4(4):351-5
pubmed: 12408252
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Jan;13(1 Suppl):S9-13
pubmed: 11843472
Europace. 2016 Aug;18(8):1265-72
pubmed: 26519025
Circulation. 2017 Aug 1;136(5):e60-e122
pubmed: 28280231
CJEM. 2012 Jul;14(4):248-58
pubmed: 22813399
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jun;12(6):e41-63
pubmed: 25980576
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2020 May;36(3):251-259
pubmed: 32425440
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Nov 12;74(19):2410-2423
pubmed: 31699282
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jul;59(7):1293-8
pubmed: 21718271
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 1;39(21):1883-1948
pubmed: 29562304
Circulation. 2004 Oct 26;110(17):2721-46
pubmed: 15505110
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jul 27;169(14):1299-305
pubmed: 19636031
QJM. 2007 Dec;100(12):771-7
pubmed: 18089543