An Investigation of the Effect of Water Additives on Broiler Growth and the Caecal Microbiota at Harvest.

broiler broiler performance caecal microbiota essential oils medium-chain fatty acids organic acids water additives

Journal

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2076-0817
Titre abrégé: Pathogens
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101596317

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 10 06 2022
revised: 15 07 2022
accepted: 11 08 2022
entrez: 26 8 2022
pubmed: 27 8 2022
medline: 27 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Campylobacter is the most common foodborne pathogen in developed countries and most cases are associated with poultry. This study investigated the effect of three anti-Campylobacter water additives on broiler growth and on the caecal microbiota at harvest using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Mixtures of organic acids (OA) and essential oils (EO) were administered to broilers for the entirety of the production cycle (35 d) and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) for 5 d immediately before harvest, under commercial conditions. Bird weight gain was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced in broilers receiving the OA and EO treatments. While this was most likely due to reduced water intake and corresponding lower feed consumption, changes to the caecal microbiota may also have contributed. Firmicutes made up over 75% of the bacteria regardless of sample type, while the minor phyla included Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Melainabacteria, and Proteobacteria. There were no significant (p > 0.05) differences in the alpha diversity as measured using ACE, Chao1, and Shannon indices, except for control (water) versus MCFA and OA versus MCFA, using the Wilcox test. In contrast, there was a significant (p < 0.05) difference in beta diversity when the treated were compared to the untreated control and main flock samples, while linear discriminant analysis effect size (LeFSe) identified three OTUs that were present in the control but absent in the treated birds. It was concluded that the water additives tested adversely affected broiler performance, which may, at least in part, be due to changes in the caecal microbiota, assuming that the altered microbiota at day 35 is indicative of a change throughout the production cycle.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36015051
pii: pathogens11080932
doi: 10.3390/pathogens11080932
pmc: PMC9412471
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland
ID : 15F641

Références

J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2015 Apr 09;6(1):14
pubmed: 25954504
Gut Pathog. 2015 Feb 26;7:4
pubmed: 25806087
Elife. 2013 Oct 01;2:e01102
pubmed: 24137540
Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):494-504
pubmed: 21212162
J Food Prot. 2007 Apr;70(4):867-73
pubmed: 17477254
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63
pubmed: 21903629
Poult Sci. 2001 Mar;80(3):278-83
pubmed: 11261556
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e91941
pubmed: 24657972
Front Microbiol. 2019 May 14;10:1058
pubmed: 31139172
RSC Adv. 2018 Jun 4;8(36):20166-20181
pubmed: 35541663
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
Poult Sci. 2020 Feb;99(2):653-659
pubmed: 32029151
Food Microbiol. 2015 Jun;48:99-108
pubmed: 25790997
Poult Sci. 2016 Apr;95(4):886-92
pubmed: 26706354
Environ Microbiol. 2016 Dec;18(12):4727-4738
pubmed: 27129897
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jun 25;6:201
pubmed: 31294039
J Appl Microbiol. 2014 Sep;117(3):876-81
pubmed: 24946012
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 Sep 1;41(3):171-9
pubmed: 19709251
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Feb 02;10(2):
pubmed: 33540533
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
pubmed: 17586664
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jun 08;21(11):
pubmed: 32521778
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019 Jan 15;10:2
pubmed: 30651986
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 21;9(1):2506
pubmed: 30792439
Front Microbiol. 2017 Mar 23;8:487
pubmed: 28386253
EFSA J. 2019 Dec 11;17(12):e05926
pubmed: 32626211
Br Poult Sci. 2016 Jun;57(3):381-9
pubmed: 26962896
Nat Methods. 2013 Jan;10(1):57-9
pubmed: 23202435
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 25;10(1):5382
pubmed: 32214106
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 26;11(3):
pubmed: 33652631
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jan 08;10(1):
pubmed: 31936291
Poult Sci. 2013 Mar;92(3):671-83
pubmed: 23436518
Poult Sci. 2012 Jul;91(7):1733-8
pubmed: 22700521
Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Dec;39(12):10595-602
pubmed: 23053958
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
pubmed: 2231712
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
pubmed: 15034147
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005 Mar 20;89(6):670-9
pubmed: 15696537

Auteurs

Genevieve Greene (G)

Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland.
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.

Leonard Koolman (L)

Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland.

Paul Whyte (P)

School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.

Catherine M Burgess (CM)

Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland.

Helen Lynch (H)

School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Backweston, Celbridge, W23 X3PH Kildare, Ireland.

Aidan Coffey (A)

Department of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, T12 P928 Cork, Ireland.

Brigid Lucey (B)

Department of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, T12 P928 Cork, Ireland.

Lisa O'Connor (L)

Food Safety Authority of Ireland, George's Dock, Dublin 1, D01 P2V6 Dublin, Ireland.

Declan Bolton (D)

Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland.

Classifications MeSH