Finite Element Study of PEEK Materials Applied in Post-Retained Restorations.
biomechanical behaviors
finite element analysis
polyetheretherketone
post-retained restoration
Journal
Polymers
ISSN: 2073-4360
Titre abrégé: Polymers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Aug 2022
22 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
14
07
2022
revised:
06
08
2022
accepted:
12
08
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical behaviors of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and traditional materials (titanium and fiber) when used to restore tooth defects in the form of prefabricated post or customized post via computational modelling. First, the prototype of natural tooth, and the prototypes of prefabricated post and customized post were established, respectively, whilst the residual root was restored with dentin ferrule using reverse engineering methods. Then, the stress and strain of CFR-PEEK (PEEK reinforced by 30% carbon fiber) and pure PEEK (PEEK without any reprocessing) post were compared with those made in traditional materials using the three-dimensional finite element method. From the stress point of view, compared with metal and fiber posts, CFR-PEEK and pure PEEK prefabricated post both demonstrated reduced post-core interface stress, post stress, post-root cement stress and root cement stress; moreover, CFR-PEEK and pure PEEK customized post demonstrated reduced post stress, post-root cement stress and root cement stress, while the strain of CFR-PEEK post was the closest to that of dentin. Compared with the traditional posts, both the CFR-PEEK and pure PEEK posts could reduce the risk of debonding and vertical root fracture, whether they were used as prefabricated posts or customized posts, but the biomechanical behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced CFR-PEEK restorations was the closest to dentin, no matter if they were used as prefabricated post or customized post. Therefore, the CFR-PEEK post could be more suitable to restore massive tooth defects. Pure PEEK needs filler reinforcement to be used for post-retained restoration.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical behaviors of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and traditional materials (titanium and fiber) when used to restore tooth defects in the form of prefabricated post or customized post via computational modelling.
METHODS
METHODS
First, the prototype of natural tooth, and the prototypes of prefabricated post and customized post were established, respectively, whilst the residual root was restored with dentin ferrule using reverse engineering methods. Then, the stress and strain of CFR-PEEK (PEEK reinforced by 30% carbon fiber) and pure PEEK (PEEK without any reprocessing) post were compared with those made in traditional materials using the three-dimensional finite element method.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From the stress point of view, compared with metal and fiber posts, CFR-PEEK and pure PEEK prefabricated post both demonstrated reduced post-core interface stress, post stress, post-root cement stress and root cement stress; moreover, CFR-PEEK and pure PEEK customized post demonstrated reduced post stress, post-root cement stress and root cement stress, while the strain of CFR-PEEK post was the closest to that of dentin.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with the traditional posts, both the CFR-PEEK and pure PEEK posts could reduce the risk of debonding and vertical root fracture, whether they were used as prefabricated posts or customized posts, but the biomechanical behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced CFR-PEEK restorations was the closest to dentin, no matter if they were used as prefabricated post or customized post. Therefore, the CFR-PEEK post could be more suitable to restore massive tooth defects. Pure PEEK needs filler reinforcement to be used for post-retained restoration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36015679
pii: polym14163422
doi: 10.3390/polym14163422
pmc: PMC9412468
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81970987
Références
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010 Jul;21(7):2079-85
pubmed: 20464460
Dent Mater. 2003 May;19(3):226-31
pubmed: 12628435
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Dec;118(6):742-751
pubmed: 28434685
Br Dent J. 2018 Mar 23;224(6):413-418
pubmed: 29569608
Aust Dent J. 2011 Jun;56 Suppl 1:77-83
pubmed: 21564118
Dent Traumatol. 2009 Aug;25(4):394-8
pubmed: 19459921
J Biosci Bioeng. 2007 Nov;104(5):363-70
pubmed: 18086435
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jun;103(6):369-79
pubmed: 20493326
J Endod. 2015 Mar;41(3):309-16
pubmed: 25459568
J Dent. 1999 May;27(4):275-8
pubmed: 10193104
J Biomech. 2015 Jan 2;48(1):1-7
pubmed: 25435385
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Mar;111(3):234-46
pubmed: 24199605
Int Endod J. 2013 Jan;46(1):47-52
pubmed: 22775227
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1373127
pubmed: 28386547
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Nov;51:184-93
pubmed: 26253208
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Apr;87(4):431-7
pubmed: 12011860
J Conserv Dent. 2011 Jan;14(1):86-9
pubmed: 21691515
J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Jan;60(1):12-9
pubmed: 26520679
J Biomech. 2014 Jan 22;47(2):410-6
pubmed: 24315624
J Endod. 2002 Sep;28(9):629-33
pubmed: 12236304
Dent Mater. 2012 Dec;28(12):1280-3
pubmed: 23036863
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 26;13(15):
pubmed: 32722599
J Endod. 2018 Feb;44(2):212-219
pubmed: 29229457
J Endod. 2017 Nov;43(11):1770-1775
pubmed: 28951033
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jun;103(6):330-3
pubmed: 20493321
J Adhes Dent. 2014 Aug;16(4):383-92
pubmed: 25133270
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):439-46
pubmed: 19587865
Biomaterials. 2007 Nov;28(32):4845-69
pubmed: 17686513
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2017 Dec;231(12):1204-1212
pubmed: 29105568
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Dec;90(6):556-62
pubmed: 14668756
Dent Mater. 2005 Aug;21(8):709-15
pubmed: 16026666