Evaluation of the Anti-Spike (RDB) IgG Titer among Workers Employed at the University of Pisa Vaccinated with Different Types of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines.
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2 infection
healthcare workers
occupational medicine
vaccines
Journal
Vaccines
ISSN: 2076-393X
Titre abrégé: Vaccines (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101629355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Aug 2022
03 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
11
07
2022
revised:
28
07
2022
accepted:
30
07
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, many authors started evaluating the immunization efficacy of the available vaccines mainly through sero-positivity tests or by a quantitative assessment of the IgG against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 virus in vaccinated subjects. In this work, we compared the titers resulting from vaccination and tried to understand the potential factors affecting the immune response to the available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. This study was conducted on 670 volunteers employed at the University of Pisa and undergoing a health surveillance program at the University Hospital of Pisa. For each participant, 10 mL of blood, information about contacts with confirmed cases of COVID-19, age, sex, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptoms, type of vaccine and the date of administration were collected. In the multivariate analysis, the type of vaccine, the presence of symptoms in SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals, and the distance from the second dose significantly affected the antibody titer; the combined vaccination resulted in a faster decay over time compared with the other types of vaccination. No significant differences were observed between Spikevax and Comirnaty (p > 0.05), while the antibody levels remain more stable in subjects undergoing Vaxzevria vaccination (p < 0.01) compared with mRNA-based ones.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36016132
pii: vaccines10081244
doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081244
pmc: PMC9416074
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Autoimmun. 2021 Sep;123:102703
pubmed: 34303083
ACS Nano. 2021 Jun 23;:
pubmed: 34159781
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 04;11(5):
pubmed: 34064509
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 6;11(1):3436
pubmed: 32632160
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;11(7):
pubmed: 34206567
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 Sep 2;5(1):180
pubmed: 32879307
Front Immunol. 2021 Dec 23;12:786554
pubmed: 35003104
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):1979-1993
pubmed: 33220855
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;10(2):
pubmed: 35214782
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 May;28(5):2802-2806
pubmed: 33613046
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Sep;27(9):1351.e5-1351.e7
pubmed: 33975007
medRxiv. 2021 Feb 26;:
pubmed: 33655279
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Oct;27(10):1516.e7-1516.e14
pubmed: 34111577
Cell. 2021 Jan 21;184(2):476-488.e11
pubmed: 33412089
J Infect Public Health. 2021 Oct;14(10):1560-1562
pubmed: 34247945
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7847):630-634
pubmed: 33276369
Cell Rep Med. 2021 May 18;2(5):100275
pubmed: 33899033
Nat Med. 2021 Sep;27(9):1530-1535
pubmed: 34312554
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1664-1670
pubmed: 32618497
Science. 2022 Jan 07;375(6576):43-50
pubmed: 34812653
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 03;11(3):
pubmed: 33802453
Front Immunol. 2022 Jan 21;13:811952
pubmed: 35126396