Impact of interhospital transfer vs. direct admission on acute ischemic stroke patients: A subset analysis of the COMPLETE registry.
acute ischemic stroke
aspiration thrombectomy
interhospital transfer
large vessel occlusion (LVO)
stroke systems of care
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
14
03
2022
accepted:
13
07
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
27
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Efficacy of thrombectomy treatment in acute ischemic stroke large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) patients is time dependent. Direct admission to thrombectomy centers (vs. interhospital transfer) may reduce time to treatment and improve outcomes. In this subset analysis of the COMPLETE registry, we compared outcomes between direct to thrombectomy center (Direct) vs. transfer from another hospital to thrombectomy center (Transfer) in AIS-LVO patients treated with aspiration thrombectomy. COMPLETE was a prospective, international registry that enrolled patients from July 2018 to October 2019, with a 90-day follow-up period that was completed in January 2020. Imaging findings and safety events were adjudicated by core lab and independent medical reviewers, respectively. Pre-defined primary endpoints included post-procedure angiographic revascularization (mTICI ≥2b), 90-day functional outcome (mRS 0-2), and 90-day all-cause mortality. Planned collections of procedural time metrics and outcomes were used in the present Of 650 patients enrolled, 343 were transfer [52.8% female; mean (SD) age, 68.2 (13.9) years], and 307 were direct [55.4% female; 68.5 (14.5) years] admit. Median onset-to-puncture time took longer in the transfer vs. direct cohort (5.65 vs. 3.18 h: 2.33 h difference, respectively; In the COMPLETE registry, direct to thrombectomy center was associated with significantly shorter onset-to-puncture times, and higher rates of good clinical outcome across different geographies. Additional research should focus on AIS-LVO detection to facilitate direct routing of patients to appropriate treatment centers. https://clinicaltrials.gov (Unique identifier: NCT03464565).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Efficacy of thrombectomy treatment in acute ischemic stroke large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) patients is time dependent. Direct admission to thrombectomy centers (vs. interhospital transfer) may reduce time to treatment and improve outcomes. In this subset analysis of the COMPLETE registry, we compared outcomes between direct to thrombectomy center (Direct) vs. transfer from another hospital to thrombectomy center (Transfer) in AIS-LVO patients treated with aspiration thrombectomy.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
COMPLETE was a prospective, international registry that enrolled patients from July 2018 to October 2019, with a 90-day follow-up period that was completed in January 2020. Imaging findings and safety events were adjudicated by core lab and independent medical reviewers, respectively. Pre-defined primary endpoints included post-procedure angiographic revascularization (mTICI ≥2b), 90-day functional outcome (mRS 0-2), and 90-day all-cause mortality. Planned collections of procedural time metrics and outcomes were used in the present
Results
UNASSIGNED
Of 650 patients enrolled, 343 were transfer [52.8% female; mean (SD) age, 68.2 (13.9) years], and 307 were direct [55.4% female; 68.5 (14.5) years] admit. Median onset-to-puncture time took longer in the transfer vs. direct cohort (5.65 vs. 3.18 h: 2.33 h difference, respectively;
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
In the COMPLETE registry, direct to thrombectomy center was associated with significantly shorter onset-to-puncture times, and higher rates of good clinical outcome across different geographies. Additional research should focus on AIS-LVO detection to facilitate direct routing of patients to appropriate treatment centers.
Clinical trial registration
UNASSIGNED
https://clinicaltrials.gov (Unique identifier: NCT03464565).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36016541
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.896165
pmc: PMC9397115
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03464565']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
896165Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Hassan, Zaidat, Nanda, Atchie, Woodward, Doerfler, Tomasello and Fifi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
AH: Consultant/Speakers bureau: GE Healthcare, Genentech, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, Stryker, Cerenovus, Viz.ai, Balt and Scientia. OZ: Grant/research support from Genentech, Medtronic Neurovascular, Stryker. Consultant for Codman, Medtronic Neurovascular, National Institutes of Health StrokeNet, Penumbra, Stryker. Honoraria from Codman, Medtronic Neurovascular, Penumbra, Stryker. Serves as an expert witness. Ownership interest in Galaxy Therapeutics, Inc. JF: Grant/research support: Microvention, Penumbra, Stryker. Consultant: Microvention, Stryker. Other financial or material support: Ownership interest: Imperative Care. AN, BA, and AD: None. KW: Consulting and fees from Covidien. AT: Proctor and consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, MicroVention, and Perflow.
Références
Stroke. 2022 Mar;53(3):769-778
pubmed: 34547927
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jun 1;76(6):682-689
pubmed: 30734042
J Stroke. 2020 Sep;22(3):317-323
pubmed: 33053947
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jun;11(6):535-538
pubmed: 31152058
Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2163-2167
pubmed: 31303153
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Dec;4(4):329-336
pubmed: 31903431
JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):443-452
pubmed: 28763550
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Oct 1;78(10):1220-1227
pubmed: 34369969
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):998-1008
pubmed: 30860055
Circulation. 2013 Mar 12;127(10):1139-48
pubmed: 23393011
Int J Stroke. 2019 Jan;14(1):12-22
pubmed: 30303811
BMJ Neurol Open. 2020 Apr 05;2(1):e000030
pubmed: 33681779
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;47(3-4):112-120
pubmed: 31063998
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Sep;9(9):817-822
pubmed: 27530601
Circulation. 2017 Dec 12;136(24):2311-2321
pubmed: 28943516
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1279-88
pubmed: 27673305
J Neurol. 2021 Oct;268(10):3601-3609
pubmed: 32494852
Circulation. 2016 Jun 7;133(23):2279-86
pubmed: 27076599
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31
pubmed: 26898852
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418
pubmed: 31662037
Int J Stroke. 2019 Oct;14(7):734-744
pubmed: 31142219