Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders and Radiomics: Systematic review and quality appraisal.

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are the imaging modalities of choice for placenta accrete spectrum (PAS) disorders assessment. Radiomics could further increase the value of medical images and allow to overcome the limitations linked to their visual assessment. Aim of this systematic review was to identify and appraise the methodological quality of radiomics studies focused PAS disorders applications. Three online databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched to identify original research articles on human subjects published in English. For the qualitative synthesis of results, data regarding study design (e.g., retrospective or prospective), purpose, patient population (e.g., sample size), imaging modalities and radiomics pipelines (e.g., segmentation and feature extraction strategy) were collected. The appraisal of methodological quality was performed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). 10 articles were finally included and analyzed. All were retrospective and MRI-powered. The majority included more than 100 patients (6/10). Four were prognostic (focused on either the prediction of bleeding volume or the prediction of needed management) while six diagnostic (PAS vs not PAS classification) studies. The median RQS was 8, with maximum and minimum respectively equal to 17/36 and - 6/36. Major methodological concerns were the lack of feature stability to multiple segmentation testing and poor data openness. Radiomics studies focused on PAS disorders showed a heterogeneous methodological quality, overall lower than desirable. Furthermore, many relevant research questions remain unexplored. More robust investigations are needed to foster advancements in the field and possibly clinical translation.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.