"Impaired Resilience (00210)" in patients under fertility treatment: Clinical validation study.
infertility
nursing
resilience
validation studies
Journal
International journal of nursing knowledge
ISSN: 2047-3095
Titre abrégé: Int J Nurs Knowl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101582422
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
26
03
2022
accepted:
21
07
2022
medline:
11
7
2023
pubmed:
30
8
2022
entrez:
29
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was a clinical validation of the NANDA-I nursing diagnosis "Impaired Resilience (00210)" in people under fertility treatment and determination of the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the defining characteristics. A cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2019 and June 2020. A total of 104 patients were recruited through fertility-related websites, and they answered an online questionnaire after giving informed consent. The Rasch model was used for statistical analysis. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee. The "Impaired Resilience (00210)" had a prevalence of 15.4% in the sample, and seven defining characteristics confirmed as representative are "decreased interest in vocational activities," "depression," "impaired health status," "ineffective coping strategies," "low self-esteem," "renewed elevation of distress," and "social isolation." No item showed differential item functioning. "Renewed elevation of distress" and "low self-esteem" were the most sensitive defining characteristics and had the highest negative predictive value. "Shame" was the most specific one. The nursing diagnosis "Impaired Resilience (00210)" was validated, and results may improve its accuracy in people going through fertility treatment. This paper contributes by raising knowledge regarding NANDA-I nursing diagnosis and enhancing the quality of nurses' critical judgment and clinical reasoning. A more effective assessment will allow early recognition of patients struggling with adversity during fertility treatment and enhance a nursing resilience approach in the reproductive field. Este estudo teve como objetivo a validação clínica do diagnóstico de enfermagem “Resiliência comprometida (00210)” em pessoas a realizar tratamento de fertilidade; e determinar a sensibilidade, especificidade e valor preditivo das características definidoras. MÉTODOS: Foi conduzido um estudo transversal entre Setembro de 2019 e Junho de 2020. 104 participantes foram recrutados através de sítios afetos ao tema da fertilidade, respondendo um questionário online após o seu consentimento informado. O modelo Rasch foi empregue na análise estatística. O estudo foi aprovado pela Comissão de Ética. A “Resiliência comprometida (00210)” teve uma prevalência de 15.4% na amostra, e 7 características definidoras foram confirmadas: “Interesse diminuído pelas atividades profissionais”; “Depressão”; “Estado de saúde comprometido”; “Estratégias de coping ineficazes”; “Isolamento social”. Nenhum item apresentou funcionamento diferencial. O “Aumento renovado da angústia” e a “Baixa autoestima” foram as características mais sensíveis e com valores preditivos negativos mais altos. A “Vergonha” foi a característica mais específica. CONCLUSÕES: O diagnóstico de Enfermagem NANDA-I de “Resiliência comprometida (00210)” foi validado e os resultados possibilitaram melhorar a sua acurácia em pessoas a realizar tratamento de fertilidade. IMPLICAÇÕES PARA A PRÁTICA: Este artigo contribuiu para elevar o corpo do conhecimento da terminologia NANDA-I dos diagnósticos de enfermagem e contribuir para elevar a qualidade do julgamento crítico e poder de decisão clínica dos enfermeiros. Uma intervenção mais eficaz e preventiva permitirá apoiar as pessoas na sua habilidade para lidar com a adversidade durante o tratamento de fertilidade, sendo promotora de uma abordagem de Enfermagem baseada na resiliência em contexto reprodutivo.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(por)
Este estudo teve como objetivo a validação clínica do diagnóstico de enfermagem “Resiliência comprometida (00210)” em pessoas a realizar tratamento de fertilidade; e determinar a sensibilidade, especificidade e valor preditivo das características definidoras. MÉTODOS: Foi conduzido um estudo transversal entre Setembro de 2019 e Junho de 2020. 104 participantes foram recrutados através de sítios afetos ao tema da fertilidade, respondendo um questionário online após o seu consentimento informado. O modelo Rasch foi empregue na análise estatística. O estudo foi aprovado pela Comissão de Ética.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36031947
doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12391
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
170-178Informations de copyright
© 2022 NANDA International, Inc.
Références
Ahern, N., Kiehl, E., Lou Sole, M., & Byers, J. (2006). A review of instruments measuring resilience. In Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing (Vol. 29, 2), 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/01460860600677643
Allot, L., Payne, D., & Dann, L. (2013). Midwifery and Assisted Reproductive Technologies. New Zealand College of Midwives, 47, 10-13.
Cabral, H. B. O., & Bucher-Maluschke, J. S. N. F. (2016). Desenvolvimento dos fatores de resiliência no contexto da infertilidade: Revisão. Psicologia, Saúde & Doença, 17(3), 503-514. https://doi.org/10.15309/16psd170315
Caldeira, S., & Timmins, F. (2016). Resilience: Synthesis of concept analyses and contribution to nursing classifications. International Nursing Review, 63(2), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12268
Daibes, M. A., Safadi, R. R., Athamneh, T., Anees, I. F., & Constantino, R. E. (2018). “Half a woman, half a man; that is how they make me feel”: A qualitative study of rural Jordanian women's experience of infertility. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 20(5), 516-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1359672
de Souza Oliveira-Kumakura, A. R., Caldeira, S., Prado Simão, T., Camargo-Figuera, F. A., de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz, D., & Campos de Carvalho, E. (2018). The contribution of the Rasch Model to the clinical validation of nursing diagnoses: Integrative literature review. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 29(2), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12162
Deep, C., & Pereira, I. (2012). Adaptação da “The Resilience Scale” para a população adulta portuguesa. Psicologia USP, 23(2), 417-433.
Dierickx, S., Rahbari, L., Longman, C., Jaiteh, F., & Coene, G. (2018). ‘I am always crying on the inside’: A qualitative study on the implications of infertility on women's lives in urban Gambia. Reproductive Health, 15(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0596-2
Dyer, S. J., Abrahams, N., Hoffman, M., & van der Spuy, Z. M. (2002). “Men leave me as I cannot have children”: Women's experiences with involuntary childlessness. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 17(6), 1663-1668.
Gameiro, S., Van Den Belt-Dusebout, A. W., Smeenk, J. M. J., Braat, D. D. M., Van Leeuwen, F. E., & Verhaak, C. M. (2016). Women's adjustment trajectories during IVF and impact on mental health 11-17 years later. Human Reproduction, 31(8), 1788-1798. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew131
Goodman, F. R., Disabato, D. J., Kashdan, T. B., & Machell, K. A. (2017). Personality strengths as resilience: A one-year multiwave study. Journal of Personality, 85(3), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12250
Hagquist, C., Bruce, M., & Gustavsson, J. P. (2009). Using the Rasch model in nursing research: An introduction and illustrative example. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 380-393.
Herdman, H. T., Kamitsuru, S., & Lopes, camila. (2021). NANDA International, Inc. Nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification 2021-2023 (12th ed.). Thieme Medical.
Herrmann, D., Scherg, H., Verres, R., Von Hagens, C., Strowitzki, T., & Wischmann, T. (2011). Resilience in infertile couples acts as a protective factor against infertility-specific distress and impaired quality of life. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 28(11), 1111-1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9637-2
Herdman, H. T., & Kamitsuru, S. (2018). Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions & Classification 2018-2020. Thieme.
Hinton, L., Kurinczuk, J. J., & Ziebland, S. (2010). Infertility; isolation and the Internet: A qualitative interview study. Patient Education and Counseling, 81(3), 436-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.023
Kim, G. M., Lim, J. Y., Kim, E. J., & Park, S. M. (2019). Resilience of patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review. Health and Social Care in the Community, 27(4), 797-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12620
Levett-Jones, T., Hoffman, K., Dempsey, J., Jeong, S. Y.-S., Noble, D., Norton, C. A., Roche, J., & Hickey, N. (2010). The “five rights” of clinical reasoning: An educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically “at risk” patients. Nurse Education Today, 30(6), 515-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.020
Li, Y., Zhang, X., Shi, M., Guo, S., & Wang, L. (2019). Resilience acts as a moderator in the relationship between infertility-related stress and fertility quality of life among women with infertility: A cross-sectional study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1099-8
Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration or person measure stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7, 328.
Linacre, J. M. (2011). Table 23.1, 23.11, … Principal components/contrast plots of item loadings. Winsteps. https://www.winsteps.com/winman/table23_1.htm
Linacre, J. M. (2021a). Table 23.0 Variance components for items. Winsteps. https://www.winsteps.com/winman/table23_0.htm
Linacre, J. M. (2021b). Table 24.99 Largest residual correlations for persons. https://www.winsteps.com/winman/table23_0.htm
Linacre, J. M. (2021c). WINSTEPS - Multiple-choice, rating scale and partial credit Rasch analysis (4.8.0) [Computer software]. https://www.winsteps.com/winsteps.htm
Linacre, J. M. (2021d). Table 23.0 Variance components scree plot for items: Winsteps Help. https://www.winsteps.com/winman/table23_0.htm
Linacre, J. M. (2021e). Dimensionality: Contrasts & variances: Winsteps Help. https://www.winsteps.com/winman/principalcomponents.htm
Lopes, V., & Leal, I. (2010). Avaliação em Sexualidade e Parentalidade-Escala de Ajustamento à Fertilidade (EAF). Isabel Leal e João Maroco.
Lopes, V. M. S. (2008). Personalidade e ajustamento emocional na infertilidade [Mestrado em Psicologia da Gravidez e da Parentalidade, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada]. Repositório do ISPA. http://repositorio.ispa.pt/handle/10400.12/634
Mancini, A. D., & Bonanno, G. A. (2009). Predictors and parameters of resilience to loss: Toward an individual differences model. Journal of Personality, 77(6), 1805-1832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00601.x
Mascarenhas, M. N., Flaxman, S. R., Boerma, T., Vanderpoel, S., & Stevens, G. A. (2012). National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLOS Medicine, 9(12), 1-12.
McCreary, L. L., Conrad, K. M., Conrad, K. J., Scott, C. K., Funk, R. R., & Dennis, M. L. (2013). Using the Rasch measurement model in psychometric analysis of the family effectiveness measure. Nursing Research, 62(3), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e31828eafe6
McGowan, J. A., Brown, J., Lampe, F. C., Lipman, M., Smith, C., & Rodger, A. (2018). Resilience and physical and mental well-being in adults with and without HIV. AIDS and Behavior, 22(5), 1688-1698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1980-6
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. In Psychometric theory (Vol. 3, pp. 248-292). McGraw-Hill.
Orozco-Vargas, L. C., Villamizar-Carvajal, B., & Vargas-Porras, C. (2015). Impaired parenting (00056) in primiparous mothers: Clinical validation through Rasch analysis. Aquichan, 15(2), 176-187.
Pedro, J., Sobral, M. P., Mesquita-Guimarães, J., Leal, C., Costa, M. E., & Martins, M. V. (2017). Couples’ discontinuation of fertility treatments: A longitudinal study on demographic, biomedical, and psychosocial risk factors. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 34(2), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0844-8
Peters, K. (2003). In pursuit of motherhood: The IVF experience. Contemporary Nurse, 14(3), 258-270.
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2012). Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 99(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.023
Ridenour, A. F., Yorgason, J. B., & Peterson, B. (2009). The infertility resilience model: Assessing individual, couple, and external predictive factors. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31(1), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-008-9077-z
Romeiro, J., & Caldeira, S. (2018). The human responses and nursing diagnoses of those living with infertility: A qualitative systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 30, 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12223
Romeiro, J., & Caldeira, S. (2019). The Human Responses and Nursing Diagnoses of Those Living With Infertility: A Qualitative Systematic Review. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 30(3), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12223
Romeiro, J., Caldeira, S., Brady, V., Timmins, F., & Hall, J. (2017). Spiritual aspects of living with infertility: A synthesis of qualitative studies. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26, 3917-3935. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13813
Safitri, M., Mariyanti, S., & Sasongko, B. (2022). Social support and resilience in women who have infertility. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Health - ICOH (pp. 133-139). Science and Technology Press. https://www.scitepress.org/PublicationsDetail.aspx?ID=tJ9LRHlmDHY=&t=1
Santa-Cruz, D., Chamorro, S., & Garcia-Velasco, J. A. (2019). The mediating role of optimism and resilience on emotional distress in infertility: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Psychological Research and Reviews, 2, 22-22. https://doi.org/10.28933/ijprr-2019-09-2105
Satir, D. G., & Kavlak, O. (2017). Use of the Internet related to infertility by infertile women and men in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(2), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.332.12620
Sathian, B., Asim, M., Banerjee, I., Pizarro, A. B., Roy, B., >van Teijlingen, E. R., do Nascimento, I. J. B., & Alhamad, H. K. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials and clinical research: A systematic review. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 10(3), 878-887. https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v10i3.31622
Seiler, A., & Jenewein, J. (2019). Resilience in cancer patients. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 208. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00208
Sexton, M. B., Byrd, M. R., & von Kluge, S. (2010). Measuring resilience in women experiencing infertility using the CD-RISC: Examining infertility-related stress, general distress, and coping styles. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44(4), 236-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.06.007
Shiner, R. L., & Masten, A. S. (2012). Childhood personality as a harbinger of competence and resilience in adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 24(2), 507-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000120
Sormunen, T., Karlgren, K., Aanesen, A., Fossum, B., & Westerbotn, M. (2020). The role of social media for persons affected by infertility. BMC Women's Health, 20(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-00964-0
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
Van Den Broeck, U., Holvoet, L., Enzlin, P., Bakelants, E., Demyttenaere, K., & D'Hooghe, T. (2009). Reasons for dropout in infertility treatment. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 68(1), 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1159/000214839
Vatanparast, M., Yasini Ardekani, S. M., Anvari, M., Kalantari, A., Yaghmaie, F., & Royani, Z. (2020). Resilience as the predictor of quality of life in the infertile couples as the most neglected and silent minorities. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 216-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2020.1843613
Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of nursing measurement, 1(2), 165-178.
Weathers, E., McCarthy, G., & Coffey, A. (2016). Concept Analysis of Spirituality: An Evolutionary Approach. Nursing Forum, 51(2), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12128
Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21(2), 152-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959259810000420
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370-371.
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., de Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., Rienzi, L., Sunde, A., Schmidt, L., Cooke, I. D., Simpson, J. L., & van der Poel, S. (2017). The International glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Fertility and Sterility, 108(3), 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005
Zurlo, M. C., Cattaneo Della Volta, M. F., & Vallone, F. (2018). Predictors of quality of life and psychological health in infertile couples: The moderating role of duration of infertility. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 27(4), 945-954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1781-4