Effects of the Lubo cervical collar on airway patency in awake adults - A magnetic resonance imaging study.

Airway Jaw thrust Lubo cervical collar, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Patency

Journal

African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence
ISSN: 2211-4203
Titre abrégé: Afr J Emerg Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101572277

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 08 03 2022
revised: 08 07 2022
accepted: 24 07 2022
entrez: 29 8 2022
pubmed: 30 8 2022
medline: 30 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Intended for use by prehospital first responders, the Lubo A randomized, crossover, interventional study was performed to compare mean differences in airway patency at the level of the uvula, epiglottis, tongue and soft palate with and without the Lubo collar in awake volunteers using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fourteen participants each underwent two MRI scans of the upper airway: A control scan with no Lubo collar, and an intervention scan with the Lubo collar applied and jaw thrust mechanism activated. Two independent radiologists measured anterior-posterior diameter of the airway at four anatomical levels on the resulting MRI images. There was no significant difference in mean airway diameter between the control and intervention measurements at any level. Mean (SD; 95% CI: p-value) differences were 0.9 mm (-2.38; 2.3 to 0.5; p=0.17) at the epiglottis, 0.5 mm (1.6; -0.5 to 1.4; p=0.29) at the soft palate, 0.2 mm (2.86; -1.4 to 1.9; p = 0.78) at the tongue, 0.4 mm (4.04; -1.9 to 2.7; p = 0.72) at the uvula. The Lubo

Identifiants

pubmed: 36032784
doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2022.07.008
pii: S2211-419X(22)00055-6
pmc: PMC9403401
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

373-377

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of African Federation for Emergency Medicine.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Crit Care. 2017 Jul 31;21(1):192
pubmed: 28756778
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;50(3):236-45
pubmed: 17337093
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(6):e24-e28
pubmed: 28727580
Br J Anaesth. 2005 Sep;95(3):344-8
pubmed: 16006487
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):657-62
pubmed: 25540067
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Nov;65(11):841-842
pubmed: 35001960
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 18;11(1):20619
pubmed: 34663847
Resuscitation. 2010 Jul;81(7):817-21
pubmed: 20409626
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2018 Mar 30;5(1):22-28
pubmed: 29618189
JAMA. 1961 May 20;176:570-3
pubmed: 13708290
JACEP. 1976 Aug;5(8):588-90
pubmed: 1018384
Anesthesiology. 2008 Oct;109(4):605-12
pubmed: 18813038
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Jul;91(1):31-9
pubmed: 12821563
Spine J. 2014 Apr;14(4):609-14
pubmed: 24269083
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr;75(2):191-192
pubmed: 34883009
Anesthesiology. 2003 Dec;99(6):1463-4
pubmed: 14639170

Auteurs

Rudhir Jaga (R)

Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Dinell Behari (D)

Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Anton P Doubell (AP)

Department of Radiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Kobus Bergh (K)

Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Sally Candy (S)

Division of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Ross Hofmeyr (R)

Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Classifications MeSH