Misophonia: Analysis of the neuroanatomic patterns at the basis of psychiatric symptoms and changes of the orthosympathetic/ parasympathetic balance.
anatomic pathways
autonomic system
functional magnetic resonance
psychometric assessment
trigger sounds
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
02
12
2021
accepted:
14
07
2022
entrez:
29
8
2022
pubmed:
30
8
2022
medline:
30
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Misophonia is a disorder characterized by reduced tolerance to specific sounds or stimuli known as "triggers," which tend to evoke negative emotional, physiological, and behavioral responses. In this study, we aimed to better characterize participants with misophonia through the evaluation of the response of the autonomic nervous system to "trigger sounds," a psychometric assessment, and the analysis of the neurological pathways. Participants included 11 adults presenting with misophonic disturbance and 44 sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Following recently proposed diagnostic criteria, the participants listened to six "trigger sounds" and a "general annoyance" sound (baby crying) during a series of physiological tests. The effects were examined through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the analysis of heart rate variability (HRV), and of galvanic skin conductance (GSC). The fMRI was performed on a 3T Scanner. The HRV was obtained through the analysis of electrocardiogram, whereas the GSC was examined through the positioning of silver-chloride electrodes on fingers. Furthermore, the psychometric assessment included questionnaires focused on misophonia, psychopathology, resilience, anger, and motivation. Participants with misophonia showed patterns of increased sympathetic activation in response to trigger sounds and a general annoyance sound, the low frequency (LF) component of HRV, the sympathetic index, and the number of significant GSC over the threshold, where the amplitude/phasic response of GSC was higher. The fMRI analysis provided evidence for the activation of the temporal cortex, the limbic area, the ventromedial prefrontal/premotor/cingulate cortex, and the cerebellum in participants with misophonia. In addition, the psychometric assessment seemed to differentiate misophonia as a construct independent from general psychopathology. These results suggest the activation of a specific auditory-insula-limbic pathway at the basis of the sympathetic activation observed in participants with misophonia in response to "trigger and general annoyance sounds." Further studies should disentangle the complex issue of whether misophonia represents a new clinical disorder or a non-pathological condition. These results could help to build diagnostic tests to recognize and better classify this disorder. The relevance of this question goes beyond purely theoretical issues, as in the first case, participants with misophonia should receive a diagnosis and a targeted treatment, while in the second case, they should not.
Sections du résumé
Background/Aim
UNASSIGNED
Misophonia is a disorder characterized by reduced tolerance to specific sounds or stimuli known as "triggers," which tend to evoke negative emotional, physiological, and behavioral responses. In this study, we aimed to better characterize participants with misophonia through the evaluation of the response of the autonomic nervous system to "trigger sounds," a psychometric assessment, and the analysis of the neurological pathways.
Materials and methods
UNASSIGNED
Participants included 11 adults presenting with misophonic disturbance and 44 sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Following recently proposed diagnostic criteria, the participants listened to six "trigger sounds" and a "general annoyance" sound (baby crying) during a series of physiological tests. The effects were examined through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the analysis of heart rate variability (HRV), and of galvanic skin conductance (GSC). The fMRI was performed on a 3T Scanner. The HRV was obtained through the analysis of electrocardiogram, whereas the GSC was examined through the positioning of silver-chloride electrodes on fingers. Furthermore, the psychometric assessment included questionnaires focused on misophonia, psychopathology, resilience, anger, and motivation.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Participants with misophonia showed patterns of increased sympathetic activation in response to trigger sounds and a general annoyance sound, the low frequency (LF) component of HRV, the sympathetic index, and the number of significant GSC over the threshold, where the amplitude/phasic response of GSC was higher. The fMRI analysis provided evidence for the activation of the temporal cortex, the limbic area, the ventromedial prefrontal/premotor/cingulate cortex, and the cerebellum in participants with misophonia. In addition, the psychometric assessment seemed to differentiate misophonia as a construct independent from general psychopathology.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
These results suggest the activation of a specific auditory-insula-limbic pathway at the basis of the sympathetic activation observed in participants with misophonia in response to "trigger and general annoyance sounds." Further studies should disentangle the complex issue of whether misophonia represents a new clinical disorder or a non-pathological condition. These results could help to build diagnostic tests to recognize and better classify this disorder. The relevance of this question goes beyond purely theoretical issues, as in the first case, participants with misophonia should receive a diagnosis and a targeted treatment, while in the second case, they should not.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36033627
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.827998
pmc: PMC9406292
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
827998Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Grossini, Stecco, Gramaglia, De Zanet, Cantello, Gori, Negroni, Azzolina, Ferrante, Feggi, Carriero and Zeppegno.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 11;6(4):e17463
pubmed: 21494597
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 16;15(1):e0227118
pubmed: 31945068
J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):154-66
pubmed: 16254997
J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 30;41(26):5762-5770
pubmed: 34021042
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 19;371(1708):
pubmed: 28080968
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):676-82
pubmed: 11209064
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Nov 30;255:131-8
pubmed: 26291885
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49117
pubmed: 23185300
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 29;17(15):
pubmed: 32751203
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;55(5):1279-84
pubmed: 24703593
Front Public Health. 2017 Oct 16;5:265
pubmed: 29085816
Sci Rep. 2019 May 17;9(1):7542
pubmed: 31101901
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Mar-Apr;36(2):231.e1-2
pubmed: 24333158
Depress Anxiety. 2020 Dec 18;:
pubmed: 33336858
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 May - Jul;73(4-5):219-228
pubmed: 31066600
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 28;11:847
pubmed: 33005154
J Clin Psychol. 2014 Oct;70(10):994-1007
pubmed: 24752915
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54706
pubmed: 23372758
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 3;14(4):e0213140
pubmed: 30943195
Behav Ther. 2018 Mar;49(2):286-294
pubmed: 29530266
Front Neurosci. 2022 Mar 17;16:841816
pubmed: 35368272
Sci Data. 2018 Jun 26;5:180120
pubmed: 29944144
Psychiatr Q. 2021 Jun;92(2):609-619
pubmed: 32829440
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 14;11:519681
pubmed: 33519567
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 25;7:296
pubmed: 23805089
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun 02;11:111
pubmed: 28626391
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):1006-11
pubmed: 2684084
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;23:101920
pubmed: 31491818
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 01;19(11):
pubmed: 35682372
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;41S:S681
pubmed: 28859824
Curr Biol. 2017 Feb 20;27(4):527-533
pubmed: 28162895
Eur Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;22(6):387-94
pubmed: 17416488
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
pubmed: 14399272
Gait Posture. 2018 Feb;60:148-153
pubmed: 29216598
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0231390
pubmed: 32294104
Psychophysiology. 2010 Jul 1;47(4):647-58
pubmed: 20230512
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jul 09;13:710
pubmed: 31354419
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Oct;52(4):947-52
pubmed: 15389937
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005 Nov;30(10):1050-8
pubmed: 16005156
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:3-25
pubmed: 25726260
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jan;10(1):59-70
pubmed: 19096369
Psychosom Med. 1981 Aug;43(4):343-64
pubmed: 7280162
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 29;9:953
pubmed: 30008683
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Nov 12;12:457
pubmed: 30483086
J Clin Psychol. 2019 Jul;75(7):1203-1218
pubmed: 30859581
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(1):29-42
pubmed: 16097398
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Aug 18;11:2117-23
pubmed: 26316758
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Jun;103(3):361-6
pubmed: 18351379
Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50-5
pubmed: 13638508
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:118S-25S
pubmed: 27355761
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Oct;149:110587
pubmed: 34390941
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2020 Sep 1;319(3):R366-R375
pubmed: 32726157
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jul;34(4):300-306
pubmed: 28644199
Can J Neurol Sci. 2009 Aug;36 Suppl 2:S84-7
pubmed: 19760912
Bioessays. 2020 Dec;42(12):e2000099
pubmed: 33174254
J Neurosci. 2019 Dec 11;39(50):9878-9882
pubmed: 31676604
Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;166:23-37
pubmed: 31731913
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):210-20
pubmed: 24054542
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 22;8(1):17280
pubmed: 30467392
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep - Oct;84(5):553-559
pubmed: 28823694
Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Feb 1;77(3):276-284
pubmed: 24673881
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 May;80(2):87-95
pubmed: 21320551