Training machine learning models with synthetic data improves the prediction of ventricular origin in outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias.
digital twin
electrophysiological simulations
machine learning
outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias
synthetic databases
virtual population
Journal
Frontiers in physiology
ISSN: 1664-042X
Titre abrégé: Front Physiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101549006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
31
03
2022
accepted:
07
07
2022
entrez:
29
8
2022
pubmed:
30
8
2022
medline:
30
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In order to determine the site of origin (SOO) in outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OTVAs) before an ablation procedure, several algorithms based on manual identification of electrocardiogram (ECG) features, have been developed. However, the reported accuracy decreases when tested with different datasets. Machine learning algorithms can automatize the process and improve generalization, but their performance is hampered by the lack of large enough OTVA databases. We propose the use of detailed electrophysiological simulations of OTVAs to train a machine learning classification model to predict the ventricular origin of the SOO of ectopic beats. We generated a synthetic database of 12-lead ECGs (2,496 signals) by running multiple simulations from the most typical OTVA SOO in 16 patient-specific geometries. Two types of input data were considered in the classification, raw and feature ECG signals. From the simulated raw 12-lead ECG, we analyzed the contribution of each lead in the predictions, keeping the best ones for the training process. For feature-based analysis, we used entropy-based methods to rank the obtained features. A cross-validation process was included to evaluate the machine learning model. Following, two clinical OTVA databases from different hospitals, including ECGs from 365 patients, were used as test-sets to assess the generalization of the proposed approach. The results show that V2 was the best lead for classification. Prediction of the SOO in OTVA, using both raw signals or features for classification, presented high accuracy values (>0.96). Generalization of the network trained on simulated data was good for both patient datasets (accuracy of 0.86 and 0.84, respectively) and presented better values than using exclusively real ECGs for classification (accuracy of 0.84 and 0.76 for each dataset). The use of simulated ECG data for training machine learning-based classification algorithms is critical to obtain good SOO predictions in OTVA compared to real data alone. The fast implementation and generalization of the proposed methodology may contribute towards its application to a clinical routine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36035489
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.909372
pii: 909372
pmc: PMC9412034
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
909372Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Doste, Lozano, Jimenez-Perez, Mont, Berruezo, Penela, Camara and Sebastian.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Oct;12(10):597-608
pubmed: 26283265
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 13;12(7):e0181263
pubmed: 28704537
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 02;10(11):e0141573
pubmed: 26523732
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 Apr;286(4):H1573-89
pubmed: 14656705
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018 May;23(3):e12516
pubmed: 29226502
Sci Data. 2020 Mar 23;7(1):98
pubmed: 32251335
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Jun;12(6):e007392
pubmed: 31159581
Med Image Anal. 2015 Aug;24(1):52-62
pubmed: 26073786
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019 Apr;35(4):e3185
pubmed: 30721579
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Dec 13;379(2212):20200258
pubmed: 34689629
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 7;42(46):4717-4730
pubmed: 34534279
Eur Heart J. 2020 Dec 21;41(48):4556-4564
pubmed: 32128588
Elife. 2022 Jan 25;11:
pubmed: 35076018
Eur Heart J. 2021 Oct 7;42(38):3948-3961
pubmed: 34468739
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):863
pubmed: 33441632
Front Physiol. 2021 Feb 25;12:641066
pubmed: 33716788
Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019 May 1;348:313-333
pubmed: 32863454
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2005 Apr 01;5(2):106-21
pubmed: 16943951
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021 Apr;10(1):10-16
pubmed: 33936738
Front Physiol. 2021 Sep 01;12:713118
pubmed: 34539438
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 May;67(5):1505-1516
pubmed: 31494539
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 May;38(5):1172-1184
pubmed: 30418900
Europace. 2016 Dec;18(suppl 4):iv4-iv15
pubmed: 28011826
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Apr;51(4):570-81
pubmed: 15072211
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Dec;3(6):616-23
pubmed: 20855374
Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Jul;38(7):2331-45
pubmed: 20238165
Biomed Eng Online. 2015 Apr 17;14:35
pubmed: 25928297
Ann Biomed Eng. 2000 Jul;28(7):721-41
pubmed: 11016411
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Dec;58(12):3479-82
pubmed: 21896384
J Electrocardiol. 2019 Nov - Dec;57S:S61-S64
pubmed: 31521378
Front Physiol. 2021 Dec 14;12:753282
pubmed: 34970154
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Feb;10(2):
pubmed: 28183845
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Jan;60(1):109-119
pubmed: 34718933
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2021 Apr;2(2):126-136
pubmed: 33899043
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Jul;65(7):1662-1671
pubmed: 28952932
Front Physiol. 2019 May 15;10:580
pubmed: 31156460
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11239
pubmed: 28894131
Europace. 2020 Sep 1;22(9):1419-1430
pubmed: 32607538
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 May;28(5):504-514
pubmed: 28233951
Eur Heart J. 2021 Oct 7;42(38):3904-3916
pubmed: 34392353
Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;2(10):732-740
pubmed: 30847259