A mixed methods study of community-based health insurance enrollment trends and underlying challenges in two districts of northeast Ethiopia: A proxy for its sustainability.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
22
03
2022
accepted:
10
08
2022
entrez:
29
8
2022
pubmed:
30
8
2022
medline:
1
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The term "community-based health insurance" refers to a broad range of nonprofit, prepaid health financing models designed to meet the health financing needs of disadvantaged populations, particularly those in the rural and informal sectors. Due to their voluntary nature, such initiatives suffer from persistently low coverage in low- and middle-income countries. In Ethiopia, the schemes' membership growth has not been well investigated so far. This study sought to examine the scheme's enrollment trend over a five-year period, and to explore the various challenges that underpin membership growth from the perspectives of various key stakeholders. The study employed a mixed methods case study in two purposively selected districts of northeast Ethiopia: Tehulederie and Kallu. By reviewing the databases of health insurance schemes, quantitative data were collected retrospectively from 2017 to 2021 to examine enrollment trends. Trends for each performance indicator were analyzed descriptively for the period under study. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with nine community members and 19 key informants. Study participants were purposely selected using the maximum variation technique. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated into English. Thematic analysis was employed with both deductive and inductive coding approaches. Over the course of the study period, enrollment in the scheme at both districts exhibited non-linear trends with both positive and negative growth rates being identified. Overall, the scheme in Tehulederie has a relatively higher population coverage and better membership retention, which could be due to the strong foundation laid by a rigorous public awareness campaign and technical support during the pilot phase. The challenges contributing to the observed level of performance have been summarized under four main themes that include quality of health care, claims reimbursement for insurance holders, governance practices, and community awareness and acceptability. The scheme experienced negative growth ratios in both districts, indicating that it is not functionally viable. It will fail to meet its mission unless relevant stakeholders at all levels of government demonstrate political will and commitment to its implementation, as well as advocate for the community. Interventions should target on the highlighted challenges in order to boost membership growth and ensure the scheme's viability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The term "community-based health insurance" refers to a broad range of nonprofit, prepaid health financing models designed to meet the health financing needs of disadvantaged populations, particularly those in the rural and informal sectors. Due to their voluntary nature, such initiatives suffer from persistently low coverage in low- and middle-income countries. In Ethiopia, the schemes' membership growth has not been well investigated so far. This study sought to examine the scheme's enrollment trend over a five-year period, and to explore the various challenges that underpin membership growth from the perspectives of various key stakeholders.
METHODS
The study employed a mixed methods case study in two purposively selected districts of northeast Ethiopia: Tehulederie and Kallu. By reviewing the databases of health insurance schemes, quantitative data were collected retrospectively from 2017 to 2021 to examine enrollment trends. Trends for each performance indicator were analyzed descriptively for the period under study. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with nine community members and 19 key informants. Study participants were purposely selected using the maximum variation technique. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated into English. Thematic analysis was employed with both deductive and inductive coding approaches.
RESULTS
Over the course of the study period, enrollment in the scheme at both districts exhibited non-linear trends with both positive and negative growth rates being identified. Overall, the scheme in Tehulederie has a relatively higher population coverage and better membership retention, which could be due to the strong foundation laid by a rigorous public awareness campaign and technical support during the pilot phase. The challenges contributing to the observed level of performance have been summarized under four main themes that include quality of health care, claims reimbursement for insurance holders, governance practices, and community awareness and acceptability.
CONCLUSIONS
The scheme experienced negative growth ratios in both districts, indicating that it is not functionally viable. It will fail to meet its mission unless relevant stakeholders at all levels of government demonstrate political will and commitment to its implementation, as well as advocate for the community. Interventions should target on the highlighted challenges in order to boost membership growth and ensure the scheme's viability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36037203
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266583
pii: PONE-D-22-08512
pmc: PMC9423627
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0266583Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Dec 05;11:74
pubmed: 23217438
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 May 03;13:343-348
pubmed: 33976557
Value Health Reg Issues. 2016 Sep;10:29-35
pubmed: 27881274
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Dec;30(10):1296-306
pubmed: 25616670
Int J Equity Health. 2013 May 16;12:31
pubmed: 23680066
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Dec 16;12:747-760
pubmed: 33364800
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 20;14:538
pubmed: 25411021
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 2;15(6):e0234028
pubmed: 32484840
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Dec 04;13:2835-2844
pubmed: 33304111
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1783-1798
pubmed: 29678341
Glob Health Res Policy. 2016 Nov 22;1:18
pubmed: 29202066
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Oct 17;7(5):443-454
pubmed: 29764108
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Dec;6(12):
pubmed: 34896981
Health Policy. 2008 Aug;87(2):172-84
pubmed: 18280608
Arch Public Health. 2017 May 29;75:24
pubmed: 28560036
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4):
pubmed: 27856556
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 22;22(1):1072
pubmed: 35996128
Lancet. 2016 Jun 18;387(10037):2521-35
pubmed: 27086174
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):52
pubmed: 29378567
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Oct;33(4):794-805
pubmed: 30074646
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Oct;33(4):902-914
pubmed: 29781157
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 16;13(1):e0190911
pubmed: 29338032
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jun;88(6):402
pubmed: 20539847
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:112-119
pubmed: 30419495
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 2;19(1):544
pubmed: 31375108
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Feb 21;13:20
pubmed: 24559409
Health Econ Rev. 2012 Jul 23;2(1):13
pubmed: 22828034
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140109
pubmed: 26465935
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2014 Oct-Dec;29(4):e368-82
pubmed: 25551166
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0165151
pubmed: 27832082
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 17;3(Suppl 3):e001056
pubmed: 30364476
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;176:133-141
pubmed: 28135692
Global Health. 2020 Jan 6;16(1):4
pubmed: 31906995