Support after COVID-19 study: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study to develop recommendations for practice.
COVID-19
HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT
Health policy
REHABILITATION MEDICINE
SOCIAL MEDICINE
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 08 2022
29 08 2022
Historique:
entrez:
29
8
2022
pubmed:
30
8
2022
medline:
1
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Objectives of study stage 1 were to: explore people's experiences of illness due to COVID-19 while feeling socially isolated or socially isolating; identify perceptions of what would support recovery; and synthesise insights into recommendations for supporting people after COVID-19. Study stage 2 objectives were to engage stakeholders in evaluating these recommendations and analyse likely influences on access to the support identified. A two-stage, multimethod cross-sectional study was conducted from a postpositivist perspective. Stage 1 included an international online survey of people's experiences of illness, particularly COVID-19, in isolation (n=675 full responses). Stage 2 involved a further online survey (n=43), two tweetchats treated as large online focus groups (n=60 and n=27 people tweeting), two smaller focus groups (both n=4) and one interview (both using MS teams). Stage 1 had an international emphasis, although 87% of respondents were living in the UK. Stage 2 focused on the UK. Anyone aged 18+ and able to complete a survey in English could participate. Stage 2 included health professionals, advocates and people with lived experience. Descriptive data and response categories derived from open responses to the survey and the qualitative data. Of those responding fully to stage 1 (mean age 44 years); 130 (19%) had experienced COVID-19 in isolation; 45 had recovered, taking a mean of 5.3 (range 1-54) weeks. 85 did not feel they had recovered; fatigue and varied 'other' symptoms were most prevalent and also had most substantial negative impacts. Our draft recommendations were highly supported by respondents to stage 2 and refined to produce final recommendations. Recommendations support access to progressive intensity and specialism of support, addressing access barriers that might inadvertently increase health inequalities. Multidisciplinary collaboration and learning are crucial, including the person with COVID-19 and/or Long Covid in the planning and decision making throughout.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36038169
pii: bmjopen-2021-056568
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056568
pmc: PMC9437739
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e056568Subventions
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : COV/QMU/20/04
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
AIMS Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;8(1):137-153
pubmed: 33575413
Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Mar;25(3):278-280
pubmed: 32052514
Glob Adv Health Med. 2021 May 3;10:21649561211010137
pubmed: 34104575
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep - Oct;14(5):965-967
pubmed: 32604016
AIMS Public Health. 2021 Sep 27;8(4):665-681
pubmed: 34786427
Eur J Ageing. 2010 Jun;7(2):121-130
pubmed: 20730083
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9
pubmed: 21946660
Eur J Ageing. 2017 Mar 9;14(4):429-437
pubmed: 29180948