DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 1: classification and a multistep approach for diagnosis.
Bevacizumab
Brain metastases
Glioma
Radioation necrosis
Reirradiation
Journal
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
09
06
2022
accepted:
19
07
2022
pubmed:
30
8
2022
medline:
30
9
2022
entrez:
29
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Working Group for Neuro-Oncology of the German Society for Radiation Oncology in cooperation with members of the Neuro-Oncology Working Group of the German Cancer Society aimed to define a practical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of radiation-induced necrosis (RN) of the central nervous system (CNS). Panel members of the DEGRO working group invited experts, participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for medical treatment of RN including bevacizumab in clinical routine. Diagnosis and treatment of RN requires multidisciplinary structures of care and defined processes. Diagnosis has to be made on an interdisciplinary level with the joint knowledge of a neuroradiologist, radiation oncologist, neurosurgeon, neuropathologist, and neuro-oncologist. A multistep approach as an opportunity to review as many characteristics as possible to improve diagnostic confidence is recommended. Additional information about radiotherapy (RT) techniques is crucial for the diagnosis of RN. Misdiagnosis of untreated and progressive RN can lead to severe neurological deficits. In this practice guideline, we propose a detailed nomenclature of treatment-related changes and a multistep approach for their diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36038669
doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-01994-3
pii: 10.1007/s00066-022-01994-3
pmc: PMC9515024
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
873-883Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Mahajan A et al (2017) Post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery versus observation for completely resected brain metastases: A single-centre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18:1040–1048
pubmed: 28687375
pmcid: 5560102
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30414-X
Yamamoto M et al (2014) Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): A multi-institutional prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 15:387–395
pubmed: 24621620
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70061-0
Rusthoven CG et al (2020) Evaluation of first-line radiosurgery vs whole-brain radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer brain metastases: The FIRE-SCLC cohort study. JAMA Oncol 6:1028–1037
pubmed: 32496550
pmcid: 7273318
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1271
Wick W et al (2019) N2M2 (NOA-20) phase I/II trial of molecularly matched targeted therapies plus radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed non-MGMT hypermethylated glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 21:95–105
pubmed: 30277538
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy161
Combs SE et al (2010) Randomized phase II study evaluating a carbon ion boost applied after combined radiochemotherapy with temozolomide versus a proton boost after radiochemotherapy with temozolomide in patients with primary glioblastoma: The CLEOPATRA Trial. BMC Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-478
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-478
pubmed: 21062428
pmcid: 2996393
Straube C et al (2018) Adjuvant stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy to the resection cavity in recurrent glioblastoma—the GlioCave study (NOA 17—ARO 2016/3—DKTK ROG trial). BMC Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3928-7
doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3928-7
pubmed: 30241469
pmcid: 6151028
Dixit KS et al (2021) A multi-center prospective study of re-irradiation with bevacizumab and temozolomide in patients with bevacizumab refractory recurrent high-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11060-021-03875-8
doi: 10.1007/S11060-021-03875-8
pubmed: 34689306
Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ (2008) Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol 9:453–461
pubmed: 18452856
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70125-6
Brandsma D, Van Den Bent MJ (2009) Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas. Curr Opin Neurol 22:633–638
pubmed: 19770760
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328332363e
Chao ST et al (2013) Challenges with the diagnosis and treatment of cerebral radiation necrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:449–457
pubmed: 23790775
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.015
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): Supportive Therapie bei onkologischen PatientInnen – Langversion 1.3, 2020,AWMF Registernummer: 032/054OL
Nabors LB et al (2020) Central nervous system cancers, version 3.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 18:1537–1570
pubmed: 33152694
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0052
Bernhardt D et al (2020) DEGRO Positionspapier Radionekrose. https://www.degro.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/20201125_Positionspapier-Bevacizumab.pdf . Accessed 13.02.2022
Ruben JD et al (2006) Cerebral radiation necrosis: incidence, outcomes, and risk factors with emphasis on radiation parameters and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:499–508
pubmed: 16517093
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.002
Zhuang H, Shi S, Yuan Z, Chang JY (2019) Bevacizumab treatment for radiation brain necrosis: Mechanism, efficacy and issues. Mol Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0950-1
doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0950-1
pubmed: 31349837
pmcid: 6659280
Zhuang H, Yuan X, Yuan Z, Wang P (2017) Indication of Bevacizumab for cerebral radiation necrosis. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574892812666170425124430
doi: 10.2174/1574892812666170425124430
pubmed: 28443515
Melguizo-Gavilanes I, Bruner JM, Guha-Thakurta N, Hess KR, Puduvalli VK (2015) Characterization of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: is histology the gold standard? J Neurooncol 123:141–150
pubmed: 25894594
pmcid: 4780341
doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1774-5
Lawrence YR et al (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects in the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.091
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.091
pubmed: 21095630
pmcid: 2946486
Rahmathulla G, Marko NF, Weil RJ (2013) Cerebral radiation necrosis: A review of the pathobiology, diagnosis and management considerations. J Clin Neurosci 20:485–502
pubmed: 23416129
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.09.011
Gonzalez J, Kumar AJ, Conrad CA, Levin VA (2007) Effect of bevacizumab on radiation necrosis of the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67:323–326
pubmed: 17236958
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.010
Emami B et al (1991) Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:109–122
pubmed: 2032882
doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-Y
Marks LB et al (2010) Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S10–S19
pubmed: 20171502
pmcid: 4041542
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1754
Bentzen SM et al (2010) Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): An introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S3–S9
pubmed: 20171515
pmcid: 3431964
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040
Berberich A et al (2018) Nonmeasurable speckled contrast-enhancing lesions appearing during course of disease are associated with IDH mutation in high-grade astrocytoma patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 102:1472–1480
pubmed: 30071292
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.2004
Yuan T et al (2021) New enhancement beyond radiation field improves survival prediction in patients with post-treatment high-grade glioma. J Oncol 9437090:2021
Held T et al (2019) Clinical management of blood-brain barrier disruptions after active raster-scanned carbon ion re-radiotherapy in patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer. Cancers (Basel) 11(3):383
doi: 10.3390/cancers11030383
Minniti G et al (2011) Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis. Radiat Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717x-6-48
doi: 10.1186/1748-717x-6-48
pubmed: 22136376
pmcid: 3275813
Mayer R, Sminia P (2008) Reirradiation tolerance of the human brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:1350–1360
pubmed: 18037587
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.015
Campos B et al (2020) Analysis of a surgical series of 21 cerebral radiation necroses. World Neurosurg 137:e462–e469
pubmed: 32058117
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.005
Chambless LB, Angel FB, Abel TW, Xia F, Weaver KD (2010) Delayed cerebral radiation necrosis following treatment for a plasmacytoma of the skull. Surg Neurol Int 1:65
pubmed: 21125009
pmcid: 2980905
doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.71984
Furuse M, Nonoguchi N, Kawabata S, Miyatake SI, Kuroiwa T (2015) Delayed brain radiation necrosis: Pathological review and new molecular targets for treatment. Med Mol Morphol 48:183–190
pubmed: 26462915
doi: 10.1007/s00795-015-0123-2
Connor M et al (2016) Dose-dependent white matter damage after brain radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 121:209
pubmed: 27776747
pmcid: 5136508
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.10.003
Walker AJ et al (2014) Postradiation imaging changes in the CNS: How can we differentiate between treatment effect and disease progression? Future Oncol 10:1277
pubmed: 24947265
doi: 10.2217/fon.13.271
Raschke F et al (2020) Dose dependent cerebellar atrophy in glioma patients after radio(chemo)therapy. Radiother Oncol 150:262–267
pubmed: 32739316
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.044
Holdhoff M et al (2019) The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 141:347–354
pubmed: 30414096
doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3
Garcia GCTE, Dhermain F (2020) Pseudoprogression in gliomas: The use of advanced MRI for treatment decisions. Curr Treat Options Neurol 22:1–9
doi: 10.1007/s11940-020-00630-8
van Dijken BRJ, van Laar PJ, Holtman GA, van der Hoorn A (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging techniques for treatment response evaluation in patients with high-grade glioma, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 27:4129–4144
pubmed: 28332014
pmcid: 5579204
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4789-9
Rowe LS et al (2018) Differentiating pseudoprogression from true progression: analysis of radiographic, biologic, and clinical clues in GBM. J Neurooncol 139:145–152
pubmed: 29767308
pmcid: 7983158
doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2855-z
Kessler AT, Bhatt AA (2018) Brain tumour post-treatment imaging and treatment-related complications. Insights Imaging 9:1057
pubmed: 30411280
pmcid: 6269328
doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0661-y
Thust SC, van den Bent MJ, Smits M (2018) Pseudoprogression of brain tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 48:571
pmcid: 6175399
doi: 10.1002/jmri.26171
Sawlani V et al (2012) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy for differentiating pseudo-progression from true progression in GBM on concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Neuroradiol J 25:575–586
pubmed: 24029093
doi: 10.1177/197140091202500511
Okada H et al (2015) Immunotherapy Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (iRANO): A report of theRANO working group. Lancet Oncol 16:e534
pubmed: 26545842
pmcid: 4638131
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00088-1
Wen PY et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: Response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972
pubmed: 20231676
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541
Brandes AA et al (2008) Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: Pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro Oncol 10:361
pubmed: 18401015
pmcid: 2563059
doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-008
Kowalski ES et al (2020) Immune checkpoint inhibition in patients treated with stereotactic radiation for brain metastases. Radiat Oncol 15:1–10
doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01644-x
Galldiks N et al (2020) Imaging challenges of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with brain metastases: Response, progression, and pseudoprogression. Neuro Oncol 22:17–20
pubmed: 31437274
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz147
Niyazi M et al (2011) FET-PET for malignant glioma treatment planning. Radiother Oncol 99:44–48
pubmed: 21458093
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.03.001
Munck Af Rosenschold P et al (2015) Impact of [18F]-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine PET imaging on target definition for radiation therapy of high-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol 17:757–763
pubmed: 25537018
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou316
Langen KJ, Galldiks N, Hattingen E, Shah NJ (2017) Advances in neuro-oncology imaging. Nat Rev Neurol 13:279–289
pubmed: 28387340
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.44
Langen KJ, Watts C (2016) Amino acid PET for brain tumours—Ready for the clinic? Nat Rev Neurol 12:375–376
pubmed: 27282652
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.80
Galldiks N et al (2015) The use of dynamic O‑(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET in the diagnosis of patients with progressive and recurrent glioma. Neuro Oncol 17:1293–1300
pubmed: 26008606
pmcid: 4588758
Unterrainer M et al (2020) Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01519-1
doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01519-1
pubmed: 32317029
pmcid: 7171749
Albert NL et al (2016) Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. Neuro Oncol 18:1199–1208
pubmed: 27106405
pmcid: 4999003
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now058
Pyka T et al (2018) Diagnosis of glioma recurrence using multiparametric dynamic 18F-fluoroethyl-tyrosine PET-MRI. Eur J Radiol 103:32–37
pubmed: 29803382
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.04.003
Werner JM et al (2019) Differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumour progression: A direct comparison between dynamic FET PET and ADC values obtained from DWI MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46:1889–1901
pubmed: 31203420
doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04384-7
Galldiks N et al (2015) Diagnosis of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma using O‑(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:685–695
pubmed: 25411133
doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2959-4
Mihovilovic MI et al (2019) O‑(2-( 18 F)fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for the differentiation of tumour recurrence from late pseudoprogression in glioblastoma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 90:238–239
pubmed: 29705720
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317155
Law I et al (2019) Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18 F]FDG: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46:540–557
pubmed: 30519867
doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4207-9
Galldiks N et al (2019) PET imaging in patients with brain metastasis-report of the RANO/PET group. Neuro Oncol 21:584–595
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz003
Romagna A et al (2016) Suspected recurrence of brain metastases after focused high dose radiotherapy: can [18F]FET- PET overcome diagnostic uncertainties? Radiat Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0713-8
doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0713-8
pubmed: 27769279
pmcid: 5073742
Lohmann P et al (2018) Combined FET PET/MRI radiomics differentiates radiation injury from recurrent brain metastasis. Neuroimage 20:537
pubmed: 30175040
pmcid: 6118093
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.08.024
Galldiks N et al (2012) Role of O‑(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for differentiation of local recurrent brain metastasis from radiation necrosis. J Nucl Med 53:1367–1374
pubmed: 22872742
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.103325
El Shafie RA et al (2019) Pre-operative versus post-operative radiosurgery of brain metastases—Volumetric and dosimetric impact of treatment sequence and margin concept. Cancers (Basel) 11(3):294
doi: 10.3390/cancers11030294
Brown PD et al (2017) Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery compared with whole brain radiotherapy for resected metastatic brain disease (NCCTG N107C/CEC·3): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18:1049–1060
pubmed: 28687377
pmcid: 5568757
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30441-2
Steidl E et al (2021) Sequential implementation of DSC-MR perfusion and dynamic [ 18 F]FET PET allows efficient differentiation of glioma progression from treatment-related changes. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:1956–1965
pubmed: 33241456
doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05114-0
Paprottka KJ et al (2021) Fully automated analysis combining [ 18 F]-FET-PET and multiparametric MRI including DSC perfusion and APTw imaging: a promising tool for objective evaluation of glioma progression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:4445–4455
pubmed: 34173008
pmcid: 8566389
doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05427-8
Iuchi T et al (2011) Para-ventricular radiation necrosis after radiation therapy for malignant astrocytomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:274
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.472
Carceller F, Mandeville H, Mackinnon AD, Saran F (2017) Facing pseudoprogression after radiotherapy in low grade gliomas. Transl Cancer Res 6(S2):S254–S258
doi: 10.21037/tcr.2017.03.46
Harrabi SB et al (2022) Radiation induced contrast enhancement after proton beam therapy in patients with low grade glioma—How safe are protons? Radiother Oncol 167:211–218
pubmed: 34973277
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.035
Bahn E et al (2020) Late contrast enhancing brain lesions in proton-treated patients with low-grade glioma: Clinical evidence for increased periventricular sensitivity and variable RBE. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 107:571–578
pubmed: 32234554
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.013
Bauer J et al (2021) How can scanned proton beam treatment planning for low-grade glioma cope with increased distal RBE and locally increased radiosensitivity for late MR-detected brain lesions? Med Phys 48:1497–1507
pubmed: 33506555
doi: 10.1002/mp.14739
Shah R et al (2012) Radiation necrosis in the brain: imaging features and differentiation from tumor recurrence. Radiographics 32:1343–1359
pubmed: 22977022
doi: 10.1148/rg.325125002
McDonald MW, Linton OR, Calley CSJ (2015) Dose-volume relationships associated with temporal lobe radiation necrosis after skull base proton beam therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:261–267
pubmed: 25636754
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.011
Uhl M et al (2014) Highly effective treatment of skull base chordoma with carbon ion irradiation using a raster scan technique in 155 patients: First long-term results. Cancer 120:3410–3417
pubmed: 24948519
doi: 10.1002/cncr.28877
Liermann J et al (2018) Advanced radiation techniques in the treatment of esthesioneuroblastoma: a 7‑year single-institution’s clinical experience. Cancers (Basel) 10(11):457
doi: 10.3390/cancers10110457
Seidensaal K, Harrabi SB, Uhl M, Debus J (2020) Re-irradiation with protons or heavy ions with focus on head and neck, skull base and brain malignancies. Br J Radiol 93(1107):20190516
pubmed: 31647306
pmcid: 7066969
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190516
Kitpanit S et al (2020) Temporal lobe necrosis in head and neck cancer patients after proton therapy to the skull base. Int J Part Ther 6:17
pubmed: 32582816
pmcid: 7302730
doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00014.1
Wu VWC, Tam SY (2020) Radiation induced temporal lobe necrosis in nasopharyngeal cancer patients after radical external beam radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 15:112
pubmed: 32414378
pmcid: 7227265
doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01560-0
Wang J et al (2019) Development and validation of a model for temporal lobe necrosis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 14:1–7
pubmed: 30621744
pmcid: 6323842
doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1250-z
Pehlivan B et al (2012) Temporal lobe toxicity analysis after proton radiation therapy for skull base tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:1432–1440
pubmed: 22349042
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.042
Held T et al (2019) Dose-limiting organs at risk in carbon ion re-irradiation of head and neck malignancies: An individual risk-benefit tradeoff. Cancers (Basel) 11(12):2016
doi: 10.3390/cancers11122016
Xu Y et al (2018) Bevacizumab monotherapy reduces radiation-induced brain necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 101:1087–1095
pubmed: 29885994
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.068
Chen L et al (2018) Concurrent immune checkpoint inhibitors and stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 100:916–925
pubmed: 29485071
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.041
Martin AM et al (2018) Immunotherapy and symptomatic radiation necrosis in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiation. JAMA Oncol 4:1123–1124
pubmed: 29327059
pmcid: 5885198
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3993
Kim PH et al (2021) Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy may increase the incidence of treatment-related necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 31:4114–4129
pubmed: 33241519
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07514-0