Evaluation of the patient-accompanying app "alley ortho companion" for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: study protocol for a randomized controlled multi-center trial.
Health literacy
Osteoarthritis
Randomized controlled trial
Total hip arthroplasty
Total knee arthroplasty
eHealth application
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Aug 2022
29 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
10
12
2021
accepted:
16
08
2022
entrez:
29
8
2022
pubmed:
30
8
2022
medline:
1
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common disabilities in the elderly. When conservative management fails, total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is the treatment of choice for end-stage OA. Since quality and durability of implants has steadily improved, pre -and postsurgical processes moved into the focus of research. Hence, eHealth approaches offer an opportunity to provide a more available continuity of care. Regarding individualized pre-, peri-, and postsurgical stages, eHealth is expected to improve patient engagement, self-care, and outcomes across the surgical pathway. Aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the eHealth application "alley" as an adjuvant intervention to TJA. The app provides comprehensive information to empower patient with hip or knee OA to prepare and accompany them for their TJA surgery. Our primary hypothesis is that the pre- and postoperative adjuvant use of the eHealth application "alley" (intervention group, IG) leads to improved functional outcome. Prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center trial including n = 200 patients diagnosed with hip and n = 200 patients with knee OA (n = 200) scheduled for TJA. Patients of both groups will be randomly assigned to one of two study arms. Patients in the intervention group will receive access to the functions of the "alley" app. The app presents informative (e.g., information about osteoarthritis), organizational (e.g., information about medical rehabilitation), and emotional/empowerment (e.g., information about the relationship between mood and pain) content. Patients evaluate their condition and functional level by means of standardized digitally questionnaires. Patients in the control group will not receive any functions of the app. Assessments will be performed at baseline before, 10 days after, 1 months after, 3 months after, 6 months after, and 12 months after TJA. Primary outcome is change from baseline measured by the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 3 months after TJA. The statistical analysis (t-test for independent variables with effect size Cohen's d) is performed separately for patients with TKA and THA. Overall, the study aims to improve the understanding of the benefits of eHealth applications in the treatment of elderly patients with knee or hip arthroplasty. The approach is novel since a health care companion is combined with a digital information platform enabling direct and continuous feedback from the patients to the therapeutic treatment team. As the study investigate the effectiveness under everyday conditions, it is not feasible to control whether the patients in the IG read the educational information of the app respectively the control group consume additional information from other sources. However, this increases the external validity of the study if significant effects for the app can be demonstrated. German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00025608. Registered on 21 June 2021.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common disabilities in the elderly. When conservative management fails, total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is the treatment of choice for end-stage OA. Since quality and durability of implants has steadily improved, pre -and postsurgical processes moved into the focus of research. Hence, eHealth approaches offer an opportunity to provide a more available continuity of care. Regarding individualized pre-, peri-, and postsurgical stages, eHealth is expected to improve patient engagement, self-care, and outcomes across the surgical pathway. Aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the eHealth application "alley" as an adjuvant intervention to TJA. The app provides comprehensive information to empower patient with hip or knee OA to prepare and accompany them for their TJA surgery. Our primary hypothesis is that the pre- and postoperative adjuvant use of the eHealth application "alley" (intervention group, IG) leads to improved functional outcome.
METHODS
METHODS
Prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center trial including n = 200 patients diagnosed with hip and n = 200 patients with knee OA (n = 200) scheduled for TJA. Patients of both groups will be randomly assigned to one of two study arms. Patients in the intervention group will receive access to the functions of the "alley" app. The app presents informative (e.g., information about osteoarthritis), organizational (e.g., information about medical rehabilitation), and emotional/empowerment (e.g., information about the relationship between mood and pain) content. Patients evaluate their condition and functional level by means of standardized digitally questionnaires. Patients in the control group will not receive any functions of the app. Assessments will be performed at baseline before, 10 days after, 1 months after, 3 months after, 6 months after, and 12 months after TJA. Primary outcome is change from baseline measured by the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 3 months after TJA. The statistical analysis (t-test for independent variables with effect size Cohen's d) is performed separately for patients with TKA and THA.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the study aims to improve the understanding of the benefits of eHealth applications in the treatment of elderly patients with knee or hip arthroplasty. The approach is novel since a health care companion is combined with a digital information platform enabling direct and continuous feedback from the patients to the therapeutic treatment team. As the study investigate the effectiveness under everyday conditions, it is not feasible to control whether the patients in the IG read the educational information of the app respectively the control group consume additional information from other sources. However, this increases the external validity of the study if significant effects for the app can be demonstrated.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00025608. Registered on 21 June 2021.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36038894
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06662-6
pii: 10.1186/s13063-022-06662-6
pmc: PMC9422143
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
716Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Pain Manag. 2013 Jan;3(1):27-33
pubmed: 24645929
Clin J Pain. 2015 Jun;31(6):470-92
pubmed: 25411862
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 13;(5):CD003526
pubmed: 24820247
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1768-77
pubmed: 23021846
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Jun 29;2:32
pubmed: 15225377
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 09;5(5):e64
pubmed: 28487266
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 May-Jun;141(3):277-82
pubmed: 12822074
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Oct;26(5):649-58
pubmed: 23218429
J Rheumatol. 2006 Apr;33(4):744-56
pubmed: 16583478
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Nov 26;16:366
pubmed: 26612135
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jun;25(4):547-51
pubmed: 19427164
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 4;21(1):71
pubmed: 32019529
Dan Med J. 2015 Jul;62(7):
pubmed: 26183051
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1885-1891
pubmed: 29569016
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Nov;18(11):1372-9
pubmed: 20713163
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 16;16(4):e110
pubmed: 24739471
JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Sep 01;3(3):e29
pubmed: 26330206
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 19;14(9):e0222657
pubmed: 31536554
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;31(2):73-86
pubmed: 11132119
Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(32):1-244
pubmed: 12925269
Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Aug;30(8):914-8
pubmed: 3632732
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):1130-7
pubmed: 23661494
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Dec;44(12):989-97
pubmed: 25394689
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Mar 02;6(3):e34
pubmed: 28254734
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jun 12;7(6):e137
pubmed: 29895515
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):122-33
pubmed: 26447013
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Jan;24(1):91-8
pubmed: 26285180
Mayo Clin Proc. 2003 Jan;78(1):67-78
pubmed: 12528879
Int Orthop. 2015 Aug;39(8):1483-6
pubmed: 25862634
Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):615-29
pubmed: 21393418
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Nov 03;1:64
pubmed: 14613558
Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Feb;29(2):123-31
pubmed: 19924499
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):326
pubmed: 33810795
Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1662-1671
pubmed: 30496081
Fam Pract Manag. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(7):39-43
pubmed: 17696057
Schmerz. 2015 Dec;29(6):649-57
pubmed: 26205682
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Oct 13;2:16072
pubmed: 27734845
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683