Veterinarians' experiences of treating cases of animal abuse: An online questionnaire study.
Journal
The Veterinary record
ISSN: 2042-7670
Titre abrégé: Vet Rec
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0031164
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
revised:
11
03
2022
received:
11
11
2021
accepted:
11
05
2022
pubmed:
31
8
2022
medline:
6
12
2022
entrez:
30
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to examine veterinarians' experiences of treating cases of nonaccidental injury and other forms of animal abuse and to assess their support needs and barriers to reporting cases. An online questionnaire was completed by 215 veterinarians. The survey included items on demographics and veterinary experience, experience of nonaccidental injuries during the last 12 months, case studies, perceptions of the roles of veterinarians in identifying and reporting cases, and barriers to reporting. Fifty-three percent reported treating cases and 9% reported suspected cases of abuse in the last 12 months. Experience of abuse in the last 12 months did not vary in terms of veterinarians' age, sex or number of years in practice. The most commonly affected animals were dogs, cats and rabbits, and the most common forms of abuse were neglect and physical abuse. Case studies focused on physical abuse cases, but neglect cases more often resulted in death. Veterinarians showed high concern about animal abuse but varied in their confidence to intervene and perceived barriers to reporting. Experience of animal abuse is common, and veterinarians feel a strong moral duty to act, but can lack confidence in intervening. Abuse cases affect stress levels and compassion fatigue; therefore, support and training are needed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to examine veterinarians' experiences of treating cases of nonaccidental injury and other forms of animal abuse and to assess their support needs and barriers to reporting cases.
METHODS
An online questionnaire was completed by 215 veterinarians. The survey included items on demographics and veterinary experience, experience of nonaccidental injuries during the last 12 months, case studies, perceptions of the roles of veterinarians in identifying and reporting cases, and barriers to reporting.
RESULTS
Fifty-three percent reported treating cases and 9% reported suspected cases of abuse in the last 12 months. Experience of abuse in the last 12 months did not vary in terms of veterinarians' age, sex or number of years in practice. The most commonly affected animals were dogs, cats and rabbits, and the most common forms of abuse were neglect and physical abuse. Case studies focused on physical abuse cases, but neglect cases more often resulted in death. Veterinarians showed high concern about animal abuse but varied in their confidence to intervene and perceived barriers to reporting.
CONCLUSION
Experience of animal abuse is common, and veterinarians feel a strong moral duty to act, but can lack confidence in intervening. Abuse cases affect stress levels and compassion fatigue; therefore, support and training are needed.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1975Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Veterinary Record published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Veterinary Association.
Références
Munro HMC, Thrusfield MV. ‘Battered pets’: features that raise suspicion of non accidental injury. J Small Anim Pract. 2001;42:218-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2001.tb02024.x
Munro R, Munro HMC. Animal abuse and unlawful killing: forensic veterinary pathology. Saunders; 2008.
Lockwood R, Arkow P. Animal abuse and interpersonal violence: the cruelty connection and its implications for veterinary pathology. Vet Pathol. 2016;53(5):910-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985815626575
Hill EM, Lalonde CM, Reese LA. Compassion fatigue in animal care workers. Traumatology. 2020;26(1):96-108.
Munro HMC, Thrusfield MV. ‘Battered pets’: non-accidental physical injuries found in cats and dogs. J Small Anim Prac. 2001;42:279-90.
Munro HMC, Thrusfield MV. ‘Battered pets’: sexual abuse. J Small Anim Pract. 2001;42:333-7.
McGuinness K, Allen M, Jones B. Nonaccidental injury in companion animals in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Vet J. 2005;58(7):392-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-58-7-392
Sharpe M, Wittum T. Veterinarian involvement in the prevention and intervention of human violence and animal abuse: a survey of small animal practitioners. Anthrozoös. 1999;12(2):97-104. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279399787000309
Green P, Gullone E. Knowledge and attitudes of Australian veterinarians to animal abuse and human interpersonal violence. Aust Vet J. 2005;83(10):619-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2005.tb13275.x
Williams V, Dale A, Clarke N, Garrett NKJ. Animal abuse and family violence: survey on the recognition of animal abuse by veterinarians in New Zealand and their understanding of the correlation between animal abuse and human violence. N Z Vet J. 2008;56(1):21-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2008.36800
Lockwood R. Animal cruelty and human violence: the veterinarian's role in making the connection-the American experience. Canad Vet J. 2000;41(11):876-8.
Tong L. Identifying nonaccidental injury cases in veterinary practice. In Pract. 2016;38(2):59-68. https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.i261
Arkow P. Recognising and responding to cases of suspected animal cruelty, abuse, and neglect: what the veterinarian needs to know. Vet Med Res Rep. 2015;6:349-59. https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S87198
Fielding N, Lee R, Blank G. The SAGE handbook of online research methods. SAGE Publications; 2008.
Boyden P, Ferreira GM, Williams JM. Nonaccidental injury of animals. Vet Rec. 2019;185:1.
Osborne JW, Costello AB. Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2004;9. Article 11.
Platt B, Hawton K, Simkin S, Mellanby RJ. Suicidal behaviour and psychosocial problems in veterinary surgeons: a systematic review. Soc Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012;47(2):223-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-010-0328-6
Crane M, Phillips J, Karin E. Trait perfectionism strengthens the negative effects of moral stressors occurring in veterinary practice. Aust Vet J. 2015;93(10):354-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12366
Becker F, French L. Making the links: child abuse, animal cruelty and domestic violence. Child Abuse Rev. 2004;13(6):399-414. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.878
Bell L. Abusing children-abusing animals. J Social Work. 2001;1(2):223-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/146801730100100207
Newberry M. Pets in danger: exploring the links between domestic violence and animal abuse. Aggress Violent Behav. 2017;34:273-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.007
Wauthier L, Scottish SPCA, Williams JM. A qualitative study of children's accounts of cruelty to animals: uncovering the roles of trauma, exposure to violence, and attachment. J Interpers Violence. 2022;37(9-10):NP6405-38.
Robertson I. Legally protecting and compelling veterinarians in issues of animal abuse and domestic violence. N Z Vet J. 2010;58(3):114-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2010.67512
Arkow P, Boyden P, Patterson-Kane E. Practical guidance for the effective response by veterinarians to suspected animal cruelty, abuse and neglect. 2011. Available from: https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/Reference/AnimalWelfare/Pages/Animal-Abuse-Resources-for-Veterinarians.as
Wyatt T, Weedy A, Walling-Wefelmeyer R. Restorative justice and empathy-based interventions for animal welfare and wildlife crimes. Scottish Government Social Research. 2022. Available from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/restorative-justice-empathy-based-interventions-animal-welfare-wildlife-crimes/pages/2/