Analysis of differences and commonalities in wildlife hunting across the Africa-Europe South-North gradient.
Journal
PLoS biology
ISSN: 1545-7885
Titre abrégé: PLoS Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101183755
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
14
06
2021
accepted:
13
06
2022
entrez:
30
8
2022
pubmed:
31
8
2022
medline:
3
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hunting and its impacts on wildlife are typically studied regionally, with a particular focus on the Global South. Hunting can, however, also undermine rewilding efforts or threaten wildlife in the Global North. Little is known about how hunting manifests under varying socioeconomic and ecological contexts across the Global South and North. Herein, we examined differences and commonalities in hunting characteristics across an exemplary Global South-North gradient approximated by the Human Development Index (HDI) using face-to-face interviews with 114 protected area (PA) managers in 25 African and European countries. Generally, we observed that hunting ranges from the illegal, economically motivated, and unsustainable hunting of herbivores in the South to the legal, socially and ecologically motivated hunting of ungulates within parks and the illegal hunting of mainly predators outside parks in the North. Commonalities across this Africa-Europe South-North gradient included increased conflict-related killings in human-dominated landscapes and decreased illegal hunting with beneficial community conditions, such as mutual trust resulting from community involvement in PA management. Nevertheless, local conditions cannot outweigh the strong effect of the HDI on unsustainable hunting. Our findings highlight regional challenges that require collaborative, integrative efforts in wildlife conservation across actors, while identified commonalities may outline universal mechanisms for achieving this goal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36040953
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001707
pii: PBIOLOGY-D-21-01561
pmc: PMC9426919
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e3001707Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Sci Adv. 2020 Sep 4;6(36):
pubmed: 32917612
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 7;279(1730):910-5
pubmed: 21849323
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 26;109(52):21265-70
pubmed: 23236173
Biol Conserv. 2019 Apr;232:66-73
pubmed: 31007267
J Environ Manage. 2020 Apr 15;260:110068
pubmed: 32090812
Science. 2014 Dec 19;346(6216):1517-9
pubmed: 25525247
Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):290-4
pubmed: 22832582
Conserv Biol. 2012 Jun;26(3):565-71
pubmed: 22394275
Science. 1998 Jun 26;280(5372):2126-8
pubmed: 9641920
Conserv Biol. 2020 Aug;34(4):786-794
pubmed: 32406977
Conserv Biol. 2016 Dec;30(6):1212-1221
pubmed: 27112595
Behav Ecol. 2009 Mar;20(2):416-420
pubmed: 19461866
Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Sep;36(9):808-821
pubmed: 34303527
Science. 2022 Feb 4;375(6580):482
pubmed: 35113703
World Dev. 2020 Dec;136:105121
pubmed: 32834392
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Apr;5(4):540-548
pubmed: 33589802
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 5;370(1681):
pubmed: 26460133
Conserv Biol. 2016 Apr;30(2):287-96
pubmed: 26315988
iScience. 2021 Sep 03;24(9):103083
pubmed: 34585121
Conserv Biol. 2020 Aug;34(4):803-810
pubmed: 32406972
Conserv Biol. 2020 Aug;34(4):854-867
pubmed: 32406970
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 May 11;283(1830):
pubmed: 27170719
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Apr;5(4):513-519
pubmed: 33526889
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jan;2(1):116-123
pubmed: 29230025
Conserv Biol. 2020 Aug;34(4):795-802
pubmed: 32406544
Sci Adv. 2015 May 01;1(4):e1400103
pubmed: 26601172
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb;6(2):118-119
pubmed: 34824390
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 27;9(1):1100
pubmed: 29588441
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):23209-23215
pubmed: 31659036