Acceptability of a brief fatigue intervention for inflammatory arthritis: a qualitative process evaluation.
Fatigue
acceptability
brief intervention
cognitive behavioural
inflammatory arthritis
process evaluation
rheumatology
self-efficacy
Journal
Rheumatology advances in practice
ISSN: 2514-1775
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Adv Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101736676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
11
11
2021
accepted:
15
07
2022
entrez:
31
8
2022
pubmed:
1
9
2022
medline:
1
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We developed a brief cognitive behavioural, one-to-one intervention to reduce fatigue impact for patients with inflammatory arthritis. This qualitative process evaluation explored intervention acceptability and potential refinements from the perspective of patients who attended sessions and rheumatology health professionals (RHPs) who delivered the intervention. Interviews were conducted with patients and RHPs from five National Health Service (NHS) sites. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Twenty-two patients and 11 RHPs participated. Collaborative, non-judgemental consultations: patients valued having space to reflect, where their fatigue was validated. Relevant content, but not ground-breaking: patients appreciated the opportunity to tailor content to individual priorities. Daily diaries were useful to visualize fatigue. Self-awareness: patients reported increased acceptance, sense of control, and confidence to manage fatigue. Degrees of openness to change: sessions prompted patients to engage in behaviour change. For some, complicated lives made it difficult to plan for change. Engagement with intervention: RHPs liked training face to face, and sessions were more enjoyable with experience of delivery. Research There is potential for this brief fatigue intervention to benefit patients. Future research will focus on flexibility to fit with local services and creating educational resources to use in a range of contexts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36042875
doi: 10.1093/rap/rkac064
pii: rkac064
pmc: PMC9415192
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
rkac064Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003688
pubmed: 12804484
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Dec;65(12):1976-85
pubmed: 23925869
JAMA. 2002 Nov 20;288(19):2469-75
pubmed: 12435261
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):e054627
pubmed: 35851019
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 23;(8):CD008322
pubmed: 23975674
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):142-7
pubmed: 25261572
J Rheumatol. 2007 May;34(5):1174-7
pubmed: 17477482
Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1-7
pubmed: 12867348
West J Med. 2000 Feb;172(2):133-7
pubmed: 10693379
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Nov 1;58(Suppl 5):v10-v21
pubmed: 31682275
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e024338
pubmed: 30898808
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct 15;53(5):697-702
pubmed: 16208668
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Mar 15;17:129
pubmed: 26980141
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jun;69(6):955-63
pubmed: 20448289
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2019 Aug 27;3(2):rkz032
pubmed: 31559382
Musculoskeletal Care. 2017 Sep;15(3):175-185
pubmed: 27605495