Comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 08 2022
31 08 2022
Historique:
received:
11
10
2021
accepted:
23
10
2021
entrez:
31
8
2022
pubmed:
1
9
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Retro-auricular approach using an autologous graft is the main surgical method for myringoplasty (MPL). Endaural and transcanal or endoscopic approaches are also used. There is no definitive consensus on the best MPL surgical technique. The aim of this study is to compare the two most used technique, over and underlay MPL, to evaluate the difference in anatomical and functional outcomes. We made a retrospective analysis of 497 adult patients who underwent underlay or overlay primary MPL, between 2010 and 2018, and evaluated the difference in anatomical and functional outcomes. Successful functional results, evaluated 18 months after surgery, were obtained in 380 patients (76,4%); the underlay MPL obtained a successful result in 85% of patients, while the overlay technique in the 68%. We observed anatomical failure in 13.4% patients, in detail 9,8% of underlay MPL and 17,2% of overlay MPL had an anatomical failure. Our results show less complications related to the underlay technique. We believe that this remains the technique to prefer, except in subtotal or wide anterior perforations that could be better managed using the overlay technique.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36043979
doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i4.12393
pmc: PMC9534239
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2022072Références
Laryngoscope. 1956 Aug;66(8):1076-93
pubmed: 13358259
J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Aug;14(2):227-232
pubmed: 30100541
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 May;262(5):400-3
pubmed: 15368066
J Laryngol Otol. 2003 Jun;117(6):444-8
pubmed: 12818051
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Jul 27;4(5):526-531
pubmed: 31637297
Am J Otol. 2000 Jul;21(4):462-7
pubmed: 10912688
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Feb;98(2):162-9
pubmed: 3128759
J Laryngol Otol. 1992 Feb;106(2):116-9
pubmed: 1556482
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jan;33(1):48-53
pubmed: 22143300
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011 Dec;31(6):366-71
pubmed: 22323847
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;10(1):44-49
pubmed: 27334511
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980 Jul-Aug;89(4 Pt 1):331-4
pubmed: 7416683
Ear Nose Throat J. 1993 Mar;72(3):201-4
pubmed: 8482263
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Mar;114(3):366-79
pubmed: 8649869
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Sep;113(3):186-7
pubmed: 7675477
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;276(11):3081-3087
pubmed: 31482334
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Aug;37(7):838-46
pubmed: 27273405
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 Jul - Aug;71(4):219-224
pubmed: 32156440
Am J Otol. 1993 May;14(3):301-5
pubmed: 8372930
J Laryngol Otol. 1981 Jul;95(7):653-65
pubmed: 7252344
Am J Otol. 1995 Jul;16(4):532-5
pubmed: 8588656
J Laryngol Otol. 1982 Jan;96(1):25-41
pubmed: 7057077