The effect of co-dependent (thinking in motion [TIM]) versus single-modality (CogniFit) interventions on cognition and gait among community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled study.
Brain aging
Motor-cognitive intervention
Remedial intervention
Journal
BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 08 2022
31 08 2022
Historique:
received:
11
07
2021
accepted:
17
08
2022
entrez:
31
8
2022
pubmed:
1
9
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cognition and motor skills are interrelated throughout the aging process and often show simultaneous deterioration among older adults with cognitive impairment. Co-dependent training has the potential to ameliorate both domains; however, its effect on the gait and cognition of older adults with cognitive impairment has yet to be explored. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of the well-established single-modality cognitive computerized training program, CogniFit, with "Thinking in Motion (TIM)," a co-dependent group intervention, among community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment. Employing a single-blind randomized control trial design, 47 community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of thrice-weekly trainings of TIM or CogniFit. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included cognitive performance, evaluated by a CogniFit battery, as a primary outcome; and gait, under single- and dual-task conditions, as a secondary outcome. CogniFit total Z scores significantly improved from baseline to post-intervention for both groups. There was a significant main effect for time [F (1, 44) = 17.43, p < .001, η The findings show that single-modality (CogniFit) and co-dependent (TIM) trainings improve cognition but not gait in older adults with cognitive impairment. Such investigations should be extended to include various populations and a broader set of outcome measurements. ACTRN12616001543471. Date: 08/11/2016.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cognition and motor skills are interrelated throughout the aging process and often show simultaneous deterioration among older adults with cognitive impairment. Co-dependent training has the potential to ameliorate both domains; however, its effect on the gait and cognition of older adults with cognitive impairment has yet to be explored. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of the well-established single-modality cognitive computerized training program, CogniFit, with "Thinking in Motion (TIM)," a co-dependent group intervention, among community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment.
METHODS
Employing a single-blind randomized control trial design, 47 community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of thrice-weekly trainings of TIM or CogniFit. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included cognitive performance, evaluated by a CogniFit battery, as a primary outcome; and gait, under single- and dual-task conditions, as a secondary outcome.
RESULTS
CogniFit total Z scores significantly improved from baseline to post-intervention for both groups. There was a significant main effect for time [F (1, 44) = 17.43, p < .001, η
CONCLUSIONS
The findings show that single-modality (CogniFit) and co-dependent (TIM) trainings improve cognition but not gait in older adults with cognitive impairment. Such investigations should be extended to include various populations and a broader set of outcome measurements.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ACTRN12616001543471. Date: 08/11/2016.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36045345
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03403-x
pii: 10.1186/s12877-022-03403-x
pmc: PMC9429752
doi:
Banques de données
ANZCTR
['ACTRN12616001543471']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
720Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Aug 17;10:1335-49
pubmed: 26316729
Vertex. 2006 Sep-Oct;17(69):356-61
pubmed: 17088956
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 May 9;:
pubmed: 29741265
Cortex. 2005 Aug;41(4):560-9
pubmed: 16042032
Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):615-7
pubmed: 23838361
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;174(4):329-340
pubmed: 27838936
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Aug 06;10:228
pubmed: 30127732
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;14(12):1062-71
pubmed: 10607974
Ageing Res Rev. 2014 May;15:61-75
pubmed: 24632497
J Appl Gerontol. 2015 Apr;34(3):NP128-42
pubmed: 25765823
Aging Ment Health. 2009 May;13(3):376-82
pubmed: 19484601
Behav Sleep Med. 2008;6(1):32-54
pubmed: 18412036
Psychol Aging. 2012 Sep;27(3):589-600
pubmed: 22122605
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Dec;89(12):2293-6
pubmed: 19061741
Neuroepidemiology. 2013;40(1):23-9
pubmed: 23075757
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34
pubmed: 7814786
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010 Dec;65(12):1338-43
pubmed: 20643703
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 May;70(3):357-66
pubmed: 24192586
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 05;9:246
pubmed: 25999838
Lancet. 2016 Sep 17;388(10050):1170-82
pubmed: 27524393
Climacteric. 2010 Oct;13(5):487-91
pubmed: 19905991
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;18(3):221-6
pubmed: 20173423
Ageing Res Rev. 2016 Nov;31:67-79
pubmed: 27423932
Front Aging Neurosci. 2013 Mar 26;5:8
pubmed: 23531885
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 25;170(2):186-93
pubmed: 20101014
Curr Transl Geriatr Exp Gerontol Rep. 2013 Sep 1;2(3):
pubmed: 24349877
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):427-34
pubmed: 18347351
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Mar 25;9:477-92
pubmed: 24741296
Psychol Aging. 2002 Mar;17(1):85-100
pubmed: 11931290
Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(26):2197-204
pubmed: 23480646
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jul;44:206-20
pubmed: 24705268
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Jun 08;11:29
pubmed: 21651800
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 May;82(5):608-12
pubmed: 11346836
Gait Posture. 2009 Aug;30(2):192-6
pubmed: 19477649