Therapeutic Inertia in the Management of Psoriasis: A Quantitative Survey Among Indian Dermatologists and Patients.

adherence diagnosis psoriasis therapeutic inertia treatment expectations treatment goals

Journal

Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 2230-326X
Titre abrégé: Psoriasis (Auckl)
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101709086

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 24 05 2022
accepted: 03 08 2022
entrez: 1 9 2022
pubmed: 2 9 2022
medline: 2 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The primary objective of the study was to understand the therapeutic inertia in treatment and management of plaque psoriasis among dermatologists, along with determining the preferred treatment choices for management of plaque psoriasis; it also included the resulting treatment satisfaction among patients. The secondary objective was to identify the gaps in terms of knowledge and attitude among dermatologists and the expectations of patients. A multicentre, cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted among dermatologists and patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis across India. The interviews were conducted either face to face or via telephone between September and November 2020, using structured and validated questionnaires based on specific themes. The data obtained were statistically analysed, wherever applicable. Overall, 207 adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and 303 dermatologists were interviewed. Post experiencing symptoms, 44% of the patients visited general physicians for treatment and there was an average 7.8-month delay by the patients to consult a dermatologist. Approximately one-fourth of patients used home remedies before seeking medical help. One-third of dermatologists used the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) for assessing the disease severity. Majority of dermatologists preferred combination therapy for their patients. The lack of quick resolution and side effects were the major reasons for changing the treatment. Overall, only 35% of the patients complied to current treatment. Satisfaction with existing forms of therapies was highest for mild plaque psoriasis (62%) as confirmed by dermatologists, while 52% of the overall patients were satisfied with their therapy. Majority of the patients (64%) affirmed living with plaque psoriasis impacted their lives. This first-of-its-kind survey in India highlighted the gaps in terms of the disease journey between dermatologists and patients. The survey emphasises the need for shared decision-making and may benefit dermatologists in suggestive modifications of the treatment algorithm and disease management in clinical settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36046360
doi: 10.2147/PTT.S375173
pii: 375173
pmc: PMC9423113
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

221-230

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Rajagopalan et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr Pallavi Kawatra is an employee of Novartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd, India. Dr Murlidhar Rajagopalan reports personal fees from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; is a speaker and advisor for Novartis,Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Gracewell, Dr Reddy's Labs, Eli Lilly, Zydus Cadila, Merck Sharpe and Dohme and has received honoraria for lectures. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Références

Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2020 Jun;25(2):89-100
pubmed: 32192366
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Jul;179(1):173-181
pubmed: 29328510
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jan;34(1):e30-e32
pubmed: 31419345
Indian J Dermatol. 2011 Jul;56(4):403-6
pubmed: 21965848
Lancet. 2021 Apr 3;397(10281):1301-1315
pubmed: 33812489
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Apr;10(2):285-296
pubmed: 32146709
Acta Derm Venereol. 2012 May;92(3):299-303
pubmed: 22678565
BMJ. 2020 May 28;369:m1590
pubmed: 32467098
Int J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;5(9):1146-52
pubmed: 25317298
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Apr;63(4):278-285
pubmed: 28404701
Arch Dermatol. 2001 Mar;137(3):280-4
pubmed: 11255325
Int J Dermatol. 1995 Oct;34(10):685-93
pubmed: 8537154
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Aug;71(2):302-7
pubmed: 24836080
BMC Dermatol. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):4
pubmed: 29954363
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Oct;155(4):729-36
pubmed: 16965422
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Oct;149(10):1180-5
pubmed: 23945732
Cutis. 2018 Nov;102(5S):21-25
pubmed: 30566553
Dermatology. 2008;216(4):366-72
pubmed: 18319601
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Sep;24(9):989-1004
pubmed: 20477920
Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Aug;308(6):401-8
pubmed: 27206971
Arch Iran Med. 2015 Mar;18(3):153-9
pubmed: 25773688
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2022 May-Jun;88(4):515-518
pubmed: 33666030
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Oct;47(4):512-8
pubmed: 12271293
Ann Dermatol. 2013 May;25(2):156-62
pubmed: 23717005
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2018 Aug;9(8):147-158
pubmed: 30065812
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2021 Aug 14;11:109-122
pubmed: 34430450
Int J Dermatol. 2013 Mar;52(3):314-22
pubmed: 23414155
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021 Sep 10;12(5):674-682
pubmed: 34667752
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Nov 16;18(11):
pubmed: 29144382
J Dermatol. 2021 Jun;48(6):864-875
pubmed: 33580908
Adv Ther. 2022 Feb;39(2):1068-1080
pubmed: 34977985
Arch Dermatol Res. 2011 Jan;303(1):1-10
pubmed: 20857129
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Jan;12(1):61-78
pubmed: 34704231
Acta Derm Venereol. 2002;82(2):108-13
pubmed: 12125937
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010 Nov-Dec;76(6):595-601
pubmed: 21079301
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):NP662-73
pubmed: 23858523
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016 May-Jun;7(3):208-9
pubmed: 27294063
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019 Mar;9(1):5-18
pubmed: 30578464
Indian J Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Feb;49(1):84-88
pubmed: 28458428
J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2004 Mar;9(2):140-7
pubmed: 15083781
J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2004 Mar;9(2):136-9
pubmed: 15083780
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 23;20(6):
pubmed: 30909615
Australas J Dermatol. 2004 Aug;45(3):155-9; quiz 160-1
pubmed: 15250891
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Jun 06;4:35
pubmed: 16756666

Auteurs

Murlidhar Rajagopalan (M)

Department of Dermatology, Apollo Hospital, Chennai, India.

Sunil Dogra (S)

Department of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Kiran Godse (K)

DY Patil University School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, India.

Bikash Ranjan Kar (BR)

Department of Dermatology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India.

Sai Krishna Kotla (SK)

Department of Dermatology, Yashodha Hospital, Secunderabad, India.

Shekhar Neema (S)

Department of Dermatology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Abir Saraswat (A)

Indushree Skin Clinic, Lucknow, India.

Swapnil Deepak Shah (SD)

Department of Dermatology, Ashwini Rural Medical College, Solapur, India.

Nina Madnani (N)

Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Sir. H. N. Reliance Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Vidyadhar Sardesai (V)

Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College, Pune, India.

Rajiv Sekhri (R)

Fortis Hospital, Noida, India.

Sachin Varma (S)

Skinvita Clinic, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Sandeep Arora (S)

Army College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Classifications MeSH