Phase 3 evaluation of an innovative simple molecular test for the diagnosis of malaria in different endemic and health settings in sub-Saharan Africa (DIAGMAL).
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
28
06
2022
accepted:
27
07
2022
entrez:
1
9
2022
pubmed:
2
9
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) have become the cornerstone for the management of malaria in many endemic settings, but their use is constrained for several reasons: (i) persistent malaria antigen (histidine-rich protein 2; HRP2) leading to false positive test results; (ii) hrp2 deletions leading to false negative PfHRP2 results; and (iii) limited sensitivity with a detection threshold of around 100 parasites/μl blood (pLDH- and HRP2-based) leading to false negative tests. Microscopy is still the gold standard for malaria diagnosis, and allows for species determination and quantitation, but requires trained microscopists, maintained microscopes and has detection limit issues. Consequently, there is a pressing need to develop and evaluate more sensitive and accurate diagnostic tests. To address this need we have developed a direct on blood mini PCR-NALFIA test that combines the benefits of molecular biology with low infrastructural requirements and extensive training. This is a Phase 3 diagnostic evaluation in 5 African countries. Study sites (Sudan, Ethiopia, Burkina, Kenya and Namibia) were selected to ensure wide geographical coverage of Africa and to address various malaria epidemiological contexts ranging from high transmission to near elimination settings with different clinical scenarios and diagnostic challenges. Study participants will be enrolled at the study health facilities after obtaining written informed consent. Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed following the WHO/TDR guidelines for the evaluation of diagnostics and reported according to STARD principles. Due to the lack of a 100% specific and sensitive standard diagnostic test for malaria, the sensitivity and specificity of the new test will be compared to the available diagnostic practices in place at the selected sites and to quantitative PCR as the reference test. This phase 3 study is designed to validate the clinical performance and feasibility of implementing a new diagnostic tool for the detection of malaria in real clinical settings. If successful, the proposed technology will improve the diagnosis of malaria. Enrolment started in November 2022 (Kenya) with assessment of long term outcome to be completed by 2023 at all recruitment sites. Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (www.pactr.org) PACTR202202766889963 on 01/02/2022 and ISCRTN (www.isrctn.com/) ISRCTN13334317 on 22/02/2022.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) have become the cornerstone for the management of malaria in many endemic settings, but their use is constrained for several reasons: (i) persistent malaria antigen (histidine-rich protein 2; HRP2) leading to false positive test results; (ii) hrp2 deletions leading to false negative PfHRP2 results; and (iii) limited sensitivity with a detection threshold of around 100 parasites/μl blood (pLDH- and HRP2-based) leading to false negative tests. Microscopy is still the gold standard for malaria diagnosis, and allows for species determination and quantitation, but requires trained microscopists, maintained microscopes and has detection limit issues. Consequently, there is a pressing need to develop and evaluate more sensitive and accurate diagnostic tests. To address this need we have developed a direct on blood mini PCR-NALFIA test that combines the benefits of molecular biology with low infrastructural requirements and extensive training.
METHODS
This is a Phase 3 diagnostic evaluation in 5 African countries. Study sites (Sudan, Ethiopia, Burkina, Kenya and Namibia) were selected to ensure wide geographical coverage of Africa and to address various malaria epidemiological contexts ranging from high transmission to near elimination settings with different clinical scenarios and diagnostic challenges. Study participants will be enrolled at the study health facilities after obtaining written informed consent. Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed following the WHO/TDR guidelines for the evaluation of diagnostics and reported according to STARD principles. Due to the lack of a 100% specific and sensitive standard diagnostic test for malaria, the sensitivity and specificity of the new test will be compared to the available diagnostic practices in place at the selected sites and to quantitative PCR as the reference test.
DISCUSSION
This phase 3 study is designed to validate the clinical performance and feasibility of implementing a new diagnostic tool for the detection of malaria in real clinical settings. If successful, the proposed technology will improve the diagnosis of malaria. Enrolment started in November 2022 (Kenya) with assessment of long term outcome to be completed by 2023 at all recruitment sites.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (www.pactr.org) PACTR202202766889963 on 01/02/2022 and ISCRTN (www.isrctn.com/) ISRCTN13334317 on 22/02/2022.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36048775
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272847
pii: PONE-D-22-16998
pmc: PMC9436057
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, Protozoan
0
Protozoan Proteins
0
Banques de données
PACTR
['PACTR202202766889963']
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN13334317']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0272847Subventions
Organisme : European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
ID : EDCTP_RIA2018D-2496
Pays : Netherlands
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Biotechniques. 1997 Sep;23(3):504-11
pubmed: 9298224
Malar J. 2017 Mar 24;16(1):128
pubmed: 28340585
Malar J. 2016 Feb 16;15:88
pubmed: 26879936
Malar J. 2018 Jun 8;17(1):228
pubmed: 29884184
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Feb;14(1):75-84
pubmed: 21953320
Malar J. 2008 Oct 29;7:221
pubmed: 18959777
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jul;55(7):2009-2017
pubmed: 28404673
Malar J. 2012 Aug 17;11:279
pubmed: 22900750
Malar J. 2015 Dec 23;14:520
pubmed: 26701778
Sante. 2004 Apr-Jun;14(2):69-73
pubmed: 15454363
BMJ. 2005 Mar 26;330(7493):724-6
pubmed: 15790646
Arch Med Sci. 2017 Apr 1;13(3):541-549
pubmed: 28507567
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2016;53(2):87-105
pubmed: 26376713
Malar J. 2010 Jun 18;9:171
pubmed: 20565816
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527
pubmed: 26511519
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Oct;18(10):1108-1116
pubmed: 30170986
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3520-5
pubmed: 22915610
J Mol Diagn. 2018 Jan;20(1):78-86
pubmed: 29056574
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Sep;4(9 Suppl):S21-31
pubmed: 17034069
Malar J. 2018 Jul 11;17(1):260
pubmed: 29996831
Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):302-5
pubmed: 11294729
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011 Jan;399(2):831-8
pubmed: 21046083
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 May;25(5):580-585
pubmed: 30267926
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009 Jan;393(2):569-82
pubmed: 18696055
Malar J. 2016 Mar 15;15:163
pubmed: 26979286
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Oct;99(4):970-977
pubmed: 30105967
Malar J. 2017 Jul 20;16(1):294
pubmed: 28728558
Malar J. 2018 Aug 30;17(1):316
pubmed: 30165849
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;57(4):485-8
pubmed: 23881727
Parasitol Int. 2018 Dec;67(6):793-799
pubmed: 30138695
Lancet. 2021 Nov 27;398(10315):1997-2050
pubmed: 34626542
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 May;17(5):550-7
pubmed: 22469496