Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
23
12
2021
accepted:
11
08
2022
pubmed:
2
9
2022
medline:
29
10
2022
entrez:
1
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The social cost of carbon dioxide (SC-CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 36049503
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9
pii: 10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9
pmc: PMC9605864
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Dioxide
142M471B3J
Greenhouse Gases
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
687-692Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD070936
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Valuing Climate Damages: Updating Estimation of the Social Cost of Carbon Dioxide (The National Academies Press, 2017).
Aldy, J. E., Kotchen, M. J., Stavins, R. N. & Stock, J. H. Keep climate policy focused on the social cost of carbon. Science 373, 850–852 (2021).
pubmed: 34413222
doi: 10.1126/science.abi7813
Rennert, K. et al. The social cost of carbon: advances in long-term probabilistic projections of population, GDP, emissions, and discount rates. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. Fall 2021, 223–275 (2022).
Value Balancing Alliance. Methodology Impact Statement General Paper (VBA, 2021).
Pindyck, R. S. Climate change policy: what do the models tell us? J. Econ. Lit. 51, 860–872 (2013).
doi: 10.1257/jel.51.3.860
Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M. & Miguel, E. Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature 527, 235–239 (2015).
pubmed: 26503051
doi: 10.1038/nature15725
Carleton, T. & Greenstone, M. A guide to updating the US Government’s social cost of carbon. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 16, 196–218 (2022).
doi: 10.1086/720988
Anthoff, D., Kingdon, C., Plevin, R. & Rennels, L. Mimi: an integrated assessment modeling framework. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4321855 (2022).
Raftery, A. E. & Ševčíková, H. Probabilistic population forecasting: short to very long-term. Int. J. Forecast. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.09.001 (2021).
Müller, U. K., Stock, J. H. & Watson, M. W. An econometric model of international growth dynamics for long-horizon forecasting. Rev. Econ. Stat. 104, 857–876 (2022).
Dietz, S., van der Ploeg, F., Rezai, A. & Venmans, F. Are economists getting climate dynamics right and does it matter? J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 8, 895–921 (2021).
Field, C. B. et al. Technical summary. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 35–94 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Millar, R. J., Nicholls, Z. R., Friedlingstein, P. & Allen, M. R. A modified impulse-response representation of the global near-surface air temperature and atmospheric concentration response to carbon dioxide emissions. Atmospheric Chem. Phys. 17, 7213–7228 (2017).
doi: 10.5194/acp-17-7213-2017
IPCC 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Wong, T. E. et al. BRICK v0.2, a simple, accessible, and transparent model framework for climate and regional sea-level projections. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 2741–2760 (2017).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-2741-2017
Wong, T. E., Bakker, A. M. R. & Keller, K. Impacts of Antarctic fast dynamics on sea-level projections and coastal flood defense. Clim. Change 144, 347–364 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s10584-017-2039-4
Vega-Westhoff, B., Sriver, R. L., Hartin, C. A., Wong, T. E. & Keller, K. Impacts of observational constraints related to sea level on estimates of climate sensitivity. Earth's Future 7, 677–690 (2019).
doi: 10.1029/2018EF001082
Moore, F. C., Baldos, U., Hertel, T. & Diaz, D. B. New science of climate change impacts on agriculture implies higher social cost of carbon. Nat. Commun. 8, 1607 (2017).
pubmed: 29151575
pmcid: 5694765
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01792-x
Cromar, K. R. et al. Global health impacts for economic models of climate change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 19, 1203–1212 (2022).
pubmed: 35073249
pmcid: 9278641
doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202110-1193OC
Clarke, L. et al. Effects of long-term climate change on global building energy expenditures. Energy Econ. 72, 667–677 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.003
Diaz, D. B. Estimating global damages from sea level rise with the Coastal Impact and Adaptation Model (CIAM). Clim. Change 137, 143–156 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1675-4
Moore, F. C. & Diaz, D. B. Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 127–131 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2481
Ricke, K., Drouet, L., Caldeira, K. & Tavoni, M. Country-level social cost of carbon. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 895–900 (2018); correction 9, 567 (2019).
Glanemann, N., Willner, S. N. & Levermann, A. Paris Climate Agreement passes the cost–benefit test. Nat. Commun. 11, 110 (2020).
pubmed: 31988294
pmcid: 6985261
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13961-1
Hänsel, M. C. et al. Climate economics support for the UN climate targets. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 781–789 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0833-x
Gazzotti, P. et al. Persistent inequality in economically optimal climate policies. Nat. Commun. 12, 3421 (2021).
pubmed: 34103488
pmcid: 8187370
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23613-y
Bressler, R. D. The mortality cost of carbon. Nat. Commun. 12, 4467 (2021).
pubmed: 34326326
pmcid: 8322393
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24487-w
Kalkuhl, M. & Wenz, L. The impact of climate conditions on economic production. Evidence from a global panel of regions. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 103, 102360 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102360
Kotz, M., Wenz, L., Stechemesser, A., Kalkuhl, M. & Levermann, A. Day-to-day temperature variability reduces economic growth. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 319–325 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-00985-5
Anthoff, D. & Emmerling, J. Inequality and the social cost of carbon. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 6, 243–273 (2019).
Newell, R. G., Pizer, W. A. & Prest, B. C. A discounting rule for the social cost of carbon. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 9, 1017–1046 (2022).
Nordhaus, W. D. Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1518–1523 (2017).
Howard, P. H. & Sterner, T. Few and not so far between: a meta-analysis of climate damage estimates. Environ. Resour. Econ. 68, 197–225 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s10640-017-0166-z
Rose, S. K., Diaz, D. B. & Blanford, G. J. Understanding the social cost of carbon: a model diagnostic and inter-comparison study. Clim. Change Econ. 8, 1750009 (2017).
doi: 10.1142/S2010007817500099
Christensen, P., Gillingham, K. & Nordhaus, W. D. Uncertainty in forecasts of long-run economic growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5409–5414 (2018).
Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
Ho, E., Budescu, D. V., Bosetti, V., van Vuuren, D. P. & Keller, K. Not all carbon dioxide emission scenarios are equally likely: a subjective expert assessment. Clim. Change 155, 545–561 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s10584-019-02500-y
Hausfather, Z. & Peters, G. P. Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature 577, 618–620 (2020).
pubmed: 31996825
doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3
Schwalm, C. R., Glendon, S. & Duffy, P. B. RCP8.5 tracks cumulative CO
Hausfather, Z. & Peters, G. P. RCP8.5 is a problematic scenario for near-term emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 27791–27792 (2020).
Raftery, A. E., Zimmer, A., Frierson, D. M. W., Startz, R. & Liu, P. Less than 2 °C warming by 2100 unlikely. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 637–641 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate3352
Liu, P. R. & Raftery, A. E. Country-based rate of emissions reductions should increase by 80% beyond nationally determined contributions to meet the 2 °C target. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 1–10 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s43247-021-00097-8
Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases (IWG). Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide: Interim Estimates under Executive Order 13990 (2021).
US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses (2010).
von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton Univ. Press, 1944).
Gollier, C. The Economics of Risk and Time (MIT Press, 2001).
Giglio, S., Maggiori, M. & Stroebel, J. Very long-run discount rates. Q. J. Econ. 130, 1–53 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/qje/qju036
Bauer, M. D. & Rudebusch, G. D. Interest rates under falling stars. Am. Econ. Rev. 110, 1316–1354 (2020).
doi: 10.1257/aer.20171822
Bauer, M. D. & Rudebusch, G. D. The rising cost of climate change: evidence from the bond market. Rev. Econ. Stat. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01109 (2021).
Del Negro, M., Giannone, D., Giannoni, M. P. & Tambalotti, A. Safety, liquidity, and the natural rate of interest. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 2017, 235–316 (2017).
doi: 10.1353/eca.2017.0003
Council of Economic Advisers. Discounting for Public Policy: Theory and Recent Evidence on the Merits of Updating the Discount Rate https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/page/files/201701_cea_discounting_issue_brief.pdf (2017).
Drupp, M. A., Freeman, M. C., Groom, B. & Nesje, F. Discounting disentangled. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 10, 109–134 (2018).
doi: 10.1257/pol.20160240
Gollier, C. Pricing the Planet’s Future: The Economics of Discounting in an Uncertain World (Princeton Univ. Press, 2013).
Gollier, C. Discounting and growth. Am. Econ. Rev. 104, 534–537 (2014).
doi: 10.1257/aer.104.5.534
Desmet, K. et al. Evaluating the economic cost of coastal flooding. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 13, 444–486 (2021).
doi: 10.1257/mac.20180366
Jevrejeva, S., Jackson, L. P., Grinsted, A., Lincke, D. & Marzeion, B. Flood damage costs under the sea level rise with warming of 1.5 °C and 2 °C. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 074014 (2018).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aacc76
Rode, A. et al. Estimating a social cost of carbon for global energy consumption. Nature 598, 308–314 (2021).
pubmed: 34646000
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03883-8
Houser, T., Hsiang, S. M., Kopp, R. E. & Larsen, K. Economic Risks of Climate Change: An American Prospectus (Columbia Univ. Press, 2015).
Brooks, W. R. & Newbold, S. C. An updated biodiversity nonuse value function for use in climate change integrated assessment models. Ecol. Econ. 105, 342–349 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.015
Burke, M. & Emerick, K. Adaptation to climate change: evidence from US agriculture. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 8, 106–140 (2016).
doi: 10.1257/pol.20130025
Zhang, P., Deschenes, O., Meng, K. & Zhang, J. Temperature effects on productivity and factor reallocation: evidence from a half million Chinese manufacturing plants. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 88, 1–17 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.11.001
Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M. & Miguel, E. Climate and conflict. Annu. Rev. Econ. 7, 577–617 (2015).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115430
Benveniste, H., Oppenheimer, M. & Fleurbaey, M. Effect of border policy on exposure and vulnerability to climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 26692–26702 (2020).
Dietz, S., Rising, J., Stoerk, T. & Wagner, G. Economic impacts of tipping points in the climate system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2103081118 (2021).
Resources for the Future & New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA). Estimating the Value of Carbon: Two Approaches (RFF, NYSERDA, 2020); https://www.rff.org/publications/reports/estimating-the-value-of-carbon-two-approaches .
Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon (IWG). Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis under Executive Order 12866 (2010).
Clarke, L. & Weyant, J. Introduction to the EMF 22 special issue on climate change control scenarios. Energy Econ. 31, S63 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.014
Kopp, R. E. & Mignone, B. K. U.S. Government’s social cost of carbon estimates after their first two years: pathways for improvement. Econ. Open-Access Open-Assess. E-J. 6, 1–41 (2012).
doi: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-15
Morgan, M. G. & Keith, D. W. Improving the way we think about projecting future energy use and emissions of carbon dioxide. Clim. Change 90, 189–215 (2008).
doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9458-1
Kikstra, J. S. et al. The social cost of carbon dioxide under climate–economy feedbacks and temperature variability. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 094037 (2021).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1d0b
Leach, N. J. et al. FaIRv2.0.0: a generalized impulse response model for climate uncertainty and future scenario exploration. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 3007–3036 (2021).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-14-3007-2021
Nicholls, Z. R. J. et al. Reduced complexity model intercomparison project phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 5175–5190 (2020).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020
Smith, C. J. et al. FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2273–2297 (2018).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018
Forster, P. et al. The Earth’s energy budget, climate feedbacks, and climate sensitivity. In IPCC 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 7 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Smith, C. et al. The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity Supplementary Material. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (2021).
Meinshausen, M. et al. The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3571–3605 (2020).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020
Slangen, A. B. A. et al. Projecting twenty-first century regional sea-level changes. Clim. Change 124, 317–332 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1080-9
Urban, N. M. & Keller, K. Probabilistic hindcasts and projections of the coupled climate, carbon cycle and Atlantic meridional overturning circulation system: a Bayesian fusion of century-scale observations with a simple model. Tellus Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. 62, 737–750 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00471.x
Errickson, F., Keller, K., Collins, W. D., Srikrishnan, V. & Anthoff, D. Equity is more important for the social cost of methane than climate uncertainty. Nature 592, 564–570 (2021).
pubmed: 33883735
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03386-6
Church, J. A. & White, N. J. Sea-level rise from the late 19th to the early 21st century. Surv. Geophys. 32, 585–602 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s10712-011-9119-1
Dyurgerov, M. & Meier, M. F. Glaciers and the Changing Earth System: A 2004 Snapshot (Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, 2005).
Sasgen, I. et al. Timing and origin of recent regional ice-mass loss in Greenland. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 333–334, 293–303 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.03.033
Shepherd, A. et al. Mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2018. Nature 579, 233–239 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1855-2
Shepherd, A. et al. Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017. Nature 558, 219–222 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0179-y
Church, J. A. et al. Sea level change. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 13 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Ruckert, K. L., Guan, Y., Bakker, A. M. R., Forest, C. E. & Keller, K. The effects of time-varying observation errors on semi-empirical sea-level projections. Clim. Change 140, 349–360 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1858-z
Gelman, A. & Rubin, D. B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457–472 (1992).
doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136
Roy, V. Convergence diagnostics for Markov chain Monte Carlo. Annu. Rev. Stat. Its Appl. 7, 387–412 (2020).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031219-041300
Vafeidis, A. T. et al. A new global coastal database for impact and vulnerability analysis to sea-level rise. J. Coast. Res. 24, 917–924 (2008).
Edmonds, J. & Reiley, J. M. Global Energy – Assessing the Future (Oxford Univ. Press, 1985).
Edmonds, J., Clarke, J., Dooley, J., Kim, S. H. & Smith, S. J. Stabilization of CO
doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.025
Viscusi, W. K. & Masterman, C. J. Income elasticities and global values of a statistical life. J. Benefit–Cost Anal. 8, 226–250 (2017).
doi: 10.1017/bca.2017.12
Masterman, C. J. & Viscusi, W. K. The income elasticity of global values of a statistical life: stated preference evidence. J. Benefit–Cost Anal. 9, 407–434 (2018).
doi: 10.1017/bca.2018.20
Landrigan, P. J. et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 391, 462–512 (2018).
pubmed: 29056410
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0
Robinson, L. A., Hammitt, J. K. & O’Keeffe, L. Valuing mortality risk reductions in global benefit–cost analysis. J. Benefit–Cost Anal. 10, 15–50 (2019).
pubmed: 32968616
pmcid: 7473065
doi: 10.1017/bca.2018.26
Challinor, A. J. et al. Meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 287–291 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2153
Porter, J. R. et al. Food security and food production systems. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group 2 Contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report (eds Field, C. B. et al.) Ch. 7 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Tol, R. S. J. Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, part II. Dynamic estimates. Environ. Resour. Econ. 21, 135–160 (2002).
doi: 10.1023/A:1014539414591
Ramsey, F. P. A mathematical theory of saving. Econ. J. 38, 543–559 (1928).
doi: 10.2307/2224098
Weitzman, M. L. Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 36, 201–208 (1998).
doi: 10.1006/jeem.1998.1052
Dietz, S., Gollier, C. & Kessler, L. The climate beta. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 87, 258–274 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.07.005
Gollier, C. Discounting an uncertain future. J. Public Econ. 85, 149–166 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00079-2
Gollier, C. & Hammitt, J. K. The long-run discount rate controversy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 6, 273–295 (2014).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012516
Lemoine, D. The climate risk premium: how uncertainty affects the social cost of carbon. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 8, 27–57 (2021).
Dietz, S. & Venmans, F. Cumulative carbon emissions and economic policy: in search of general principles. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 96, 108–129 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.04.003
Berger, L. & Marinacci, M. Model uncertainty in climate change economics: a review and proposed framework for future research. Environ. Resour. Econ. 77, 475–501 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s10640-020-00503-3
Boadway, R. W. & Bruce, N. Welfare Economics (B. Blackwell, 1984).
Stokey, E. & Zeckhauser, R. A Primer for Policy Analysis (W. W. Norton & Co., 1978).
Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S. & Shah, V. B. Julia: a fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Rev. 59, 65–98 (2017).
doi: 10.1137/141000671