Cardiovascular Health in India - a Report Card from Three Urban and Rural Surveys of 22,144 Adults.
Cardiovascular health
India
Population Survey
socioeconomic status
urban living
Journal
Global heart
ISSN: 2211-8179
Titre abrégé: Glob Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101584391
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
08
02
2022
accepted:
12
07
2022
entrez:
2
9
2022
pubmed:
3
9
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Markers of ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) predict cardiovascular events. We estimated the prevalence of ideal CVH markers in two levels of cities and villages in India. We did pooled analysis of individual-level data from three cross sectional surveys of adults ≥ 30 years over 2010-14 (CARRS: Centre for cArdiometabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia; UDAY and Solan Surveillance Study) representing metropolitan cities; smaller cities and rural areas in diverse locations of India. We defined ideal CVH using modified American Heart Association recommendations: not smoking, ≥ 5 servings of fruits and vegetables (F&V), high physical activity (PA), body mass index (BMI) <25 Kg/m Of the total 22,144 participants, the prevalence of ideal CVH markers were: not smoking (76.7% [95% CI 76.1, 77.2]), consumed ≥5 F&V (4.2% [3.9, 4.5]), high PA (67.5% [66.8, 68.2]), optimum BMI (59.6% [58.9, 60.3]), ideal BP (34.5% [33.9, 35.2]), FPG (65.8% [65.1, 66.5]) and TC (65.4% [64.7, 66.1]). The mean number of ideal CVH metrics was 3.7(95% CI: 3.7, 3.8). Adjusted prevalence of good, moderate, and poor CVH, varied across settings: metropolitan (3.9%, 41.0%, and 55.1%), smaller cities (7.8%, 49.2%, and 43%), and rural (10.4%, 60.9%, and 28.7%) and across asset tertiles: Low (11.0%, 55.9%, 33.1%), Middle (6.3%, 52.2%, 41.5%), and High (5.0%, 46.4%, 48.7%), respectively. Achievement of ideal CVH varied, with higher prevalence in rural and lower asset tertiles. Multi-sectoral and targeted policy and program actions are needed to improve CVH in diverse contexts in India.
Sections du résumé
Background
Markers of ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) predict cardiovascular events. We estimated the prevalence of ideal CVH markers in two levels of cities and villages in India.
Methods
We did pooled analysis of individual-level data from three cross sectional surveys of adults ≥ 30 years over 2010-14 (CARRS: Centre for cArdiometabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia; UDAY and Solan Surveillance Study) representing metropolitan cities; smaller cities and rural areas in diverse locations of India. We defined ideal CVH using modified American Heart Association recommendations: not smoking, ≥ 5 servings of fruits and vegetables (F&V), high physical activity (PA), body mass index (BMI) <25 Kg/m
Results
Of the total 22,144 participants, the prevalence of ideal CVH markers were: not smoking (76.7% [95% CI 76.1, 77.2]), consumed ≥5 F&V (4.2% [3.9, 4.5]), high PA (67.5% [66.8, 68.2]), optimum BMI (59.6% [58.9, 60.3]), ideal BP (34.5% [33.9, 35.2]), FPG (65.8% [65.1, 66.5]) and TC (65.4% [64.7, 66.1]). The mean number of ideal CVH metrics was 3.7(95% CI: 3.7, 3.8). Adjusted prevalence of good, moderate, and poor CVH, varied across settings: metropolitan (3.9%, 41.0%, and 55.1%), smaller cities (7.8%, 49.2%, and 43%), and rural (10.4%, 60.9%, and 28.7%) and across asset tertiles: Low (11.0%, 55.9%, 33.1%), Middle (6.3%, 52.2%, 41.5%), and High (5.0%, 46.4%, 48.7%), respectively.
Conclusion
Achievement of ideal CVH varied, with higher prevalence in rural and lower asset tertiles. Multi-sectoral and targeted policy and program actions are needed to improve CVH in diverse contexts in India.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36051326
doi: 10.5334/gh.1137
pmc: PMC9354560
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
52Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Références
Int J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;37(12):979-985
pubmed: 27557405
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jan;60(1):7-12
pubmed: 16361448
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95
pubmed: 12900694
Circulation. 2010 Feb 2;121(4):586-613
pubmed: 20089546
PLoS Med. 2010 Apr 27;7(4):e1000268
pubmed: 20436961
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Mar;23(4):408-19
pubmed: 25917221
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2437-2460
pubmed: 29150201
Glob Heart. 2017 Sep;12(3):219-225
pubmed: 26014652
Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):937-52
pubmed: 15364185
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Dec;28(12):1197-1207
pubmed: 30360955
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222
pubmed: 33069326
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 10;8(6):e015919
pubmed: 29991625
Stat Methods Med Res. 2013 Jun;22(3):278-95
pubmed: 21220355
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 8;14(7):e0217834
pubmed: 31283784
Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):893-8
pubmed: 18310309
Public Health Nutr. 2002 Feb;5(1A):175-82
pubmed: 12027282
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 10;11:289
pubmed: 21569269
Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2004 Spring;2(1):14-23
pubmed: 18370673
J Phys Act Health. 2009 Nov;6(6):790-804
pubmed: 20101923
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Dec 12;22(12):2196-2202
pubmed: 32034915
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 28;12:701
pubmed: 22928740