Body composition from single versus multi-slice abdominal computed tomography: Concordance and associations with colorectal cancer survival.
adipose tissue
automated segmentation
body composition
colorectal cancer
computed tomography
muscle
Journal
Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle
ISSN: 2190-6009
Titre abrégé: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101552883
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
revised:
06
07
2022
received:
21
04
2022
accepted:
14
08
2022
pubmed:
3
9
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
entrez:
2
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Computed tomography (CT) scans are routinely obtained in oncology and provide measures of muscle and adipose tissue predictive of morbidity and mortality. Automated segmentation of CT has advanced past single slices to multi-slice measurements, but the concordance of these approaches and their associations with mortality after cancer diagnosis have not been compared. A total of 2871 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed during 2012-2017 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California underwent abdominal CT scans as part of routine clinical care from which mid-L3 cross-sectional areas and multi-slice T12-L5 volumes of skeletal muscle (SKM), subcutaneous adipose (SAT), visceral adipose (VAT) and intermuscular adipose (IMAT) tissues were assessed using Data Analysis Facilitation Suite, an automated multi-slice segmentation platform. To facilitate comparison between single-slice and multi-slice measurements, sex-specific z-scores were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were used to quantify agreement. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for death adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, height, and tumour site and stage. Single-slice area and multi-slice abdominal volumes were highly correlated for all tissues (SKM R = 0.92, P < 0.001; SAT R = 0.97, P < 0.001; VAT R = 0.98, P < 0.001; IMAT R = 0.89, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots had a bias of 0 (SE: 0.00), indicating high average agreement between measures. The limits of agreement were narrowest for VAT ( Single-slice L3 areas and multi-slice T12-L5 abdominal volumes of SKM, VAT, SAT and IMAT are highly correlated. Associations between area and volume measures with all-cause mortality were similar, suggesting that they are equivalent tools for population studies if body composition is assessed at a single timepoint. Future research should examine longitudinal changes in multi-slice tissues to improve individual risk prediction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Computed tomography (CT) scans are routinely obtained in oncology and provide measures of muscle and adipose tissue predictive of morbidity and mortality. Automated segmentation of CT has advanced past single slices to multi-slice measurements, but the concordance of these approaches and their associations with mortality after cancer diagnosis have not been compared.
METHODS
A total of 2871 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed during 2012-2017 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California underwent abdominal CT scans as part of routine clinical care from which mid-L3 cross-sectional areas and multi-slice T12-L5 volumes of skeletal muscle (SKM), subcutaneous adipose (SAT), visceral adipose (VAT) and intermuscular adipose (IMAT) tissues were assessed using Data Analysis Facilitation Suite, an automated multi-slice segmentation platform. To facilitate comparison between single-slice and multi-slice measurements, sex-specific z-scores were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were used to quantify agreement. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for death adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, height, and tumour site and stage.
RESULTS
Single-slice area and multi-slice abdominal volumes were highly correlated for all tissues (SKM R = 0.92, P < 0.001; SAT R = 0.97, P < 0.001; VAT R = 0.98, P < 0.001; IMAT R = 0.89, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots had a bias of 0 (SE: 0.00), indicating high average agreement between measures. The limits of agreement were narrowest for VAT (
CONCLUSIONS
Single-slice L3 areas and multi-slice T12-L5 abdominal volumes of SKM, VAT, SAT and IMAT are highly correlated. Associations between area and volume measures with all-cause mortality were similar, suggesting that they are equivalent tools for population studies if body composition is assessed at a single timepoint. Future research should examine longitudinal changes in multi-slice tissues to improve individual risk prediction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36052755
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13080
pmc: PMC9745558
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2974-2984Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K01 CA226155
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P30AG021332
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R21AG070804
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG065334
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders.
Références
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;36(6):1077-1096
pubmed: 33481108
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 May;29(5):956-965
pubmed: 32132148
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Dec;12(6):2259-2261
pubmed: 34904399
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e192-e200
pubmed: 32864598
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Dec;13(6):2974-2984
pubmed: 36052755
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;41(2):186-96
pubmed: 25468746
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2019 Jul;75:47-55
pubmed: 31132616
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Dec;97(6):2333-8
pubmed: 15310748
Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Aug;80(2):271-8
pubmed: 15277145
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Oct;11(5):1270-1282
pubmed: 32483936
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Dec;20(12):2458-63
pubmed: 22728693
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):3008-3015
pubmed: 29797673
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Dec;21(12):1603-1612
pubmed: 31266698
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1419-1427
pubmed: 29987364
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Mar 24;2(1):1049
pubmed: 25848584
JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 1;155(10):942-949
pubmed: 32805015
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Jul;7(4):713-716
pubmed: 33771476
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jul;26(7):1008-1015
pubmed: 28506965
Acta Oncol. 2020 Jul;59(7):799-808
pubmed: 32228271
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):1795-1804
pubmed: 32945971
Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(23):8451-8461
pubmed: 34643052
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 Dec;33(12):e540-e552
pubmed: 34147322
Clin Nutr. 2021 May;40(5):3360-3369
pubmed: 33223117
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 05;25(2):141-51
pubmed: 26110027
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Oct;11(5):1258-1269
pubmed: 32314543
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;144(11):2139-2147
pubmed: 30120542
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Apr;57:58-67
pubmed: 26882087
Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 May;77(2):135-151
pubmed: 29745361