Network meta-analysis of rare events using penalized likelihood regression.
bias reduction
maximum likelihood estimates
multiple treatment meta-analysis
rare endpoints
Journal
Statistics in medicine
ISSN: 1097-0258
Titre abrégé: Stat Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8215016
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 11 2022
20 11 2022
Historique:
revised:
28
07
2022
received:
03
09
2021
accepted:
12
08
2022
pubmed:
3
9
2022
medline:
25
10
2022
entrez:
2
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Network meta-analysis (NMA) of rare events has attracted little attention in the literature. Until recently, networks of interventions with rare events were analyzed using the inverse-variance NMA approach. However, when events are rare the normal approximations made by this model can be poor and effect estimates are potentially biased. Other methods for the synthesis of such data are the recent extension of the Mantel-Haenszel approach to NMA or the use of the noncentral hypergeometric distribution. In this article, we suggest a new common-effect NMA approach that can be applied even in networks of interventions with extremely low or even zero number of events without requiring study exclusion or arbitrary imputations. Our method is based on the implementation of the penalized likelihood function proposed by Firth for bias reduction of the maximum likelihood estimate to the logistic expression of the NMA model. A limitation of our method is that heterogeneity cannot be taken into account as an additive parameter as in most meta-analytical models. However, we account for heterogeneity by incorporating a multiplicative overdispersion term using a two-stage approach. We show through simulation that our method performs consistently well across all tested scenarios and most often results in smaller bias than other available methods. We also illustrate the use of our method through two clinical examples. We conclude that our "penalized likelihood NMA" approach is promising for the analysis of binary outcomes with rare events especially for networks with very few studies per comparison and very low control group risks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36054668
doi: 10.1002/sim.9562
pmc: PMC9805041
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5203-5219Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00004/06
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):43-52
pubmed: 27259973
Stat Med. 2015 Jun 15;34(13):2116-27
pubmed: 25809462
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:91-99
pubmed: 32247025
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;187(4):864-870
pubmed: 29020135
Lancet. 1991 Nov 2;338(8775):1127-30
pubmed: 1682553
BMJ. 2016 Apr 27;352:i1981
pubmed: 27121591
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):119-120
pubmed: 27749989
Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Jun;17(3):279-301
pubmed: 17925316
Lancet. 2015 Aug 15;386(9994):628-30
pubmed: 26334141
Thorax. 2013 Jan;68(1):48-56
pubmed: 23042705
Stat Med. 2019 Nov 30;38(27):5197-5213
pubmed: 31583750
Stat Med. 2018 Mar 30;37(7):1059-1085
pubmed: 29315733
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 20;29(29):3046-67
pubmed: 20827667
Stat Med. 2019 May 20;38(11):2074-2102
pubmed: 30652356
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Dec;25(6):2858-2877
pubmed: 24823642
Biom J. 2010 Feb;52(1):85-94
pubmed: 20140900
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2455-2474
pubmed: 29966490
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Sep;7(3):236-63
pubmed: 26754852
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):19-42
pubmed: 27322495
Stat Med. 2002 Aug 30;21(16):2409-19
pubmed: 12210625
Res Synth Methods. 2012 Dec;3(4):285-99
pubmed: 26053422
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Mar;184(3):415-424
pubmed: 32446286
Stat Med. 2015 Mar 30;34(7):1097-116
pubmed: 25446971
Stat Med. 2022 Nov 20;41(26):5203-5219
pubmed: 36054668
Stat Med. 2019 Jul 20;38(16):2992-3012
pubmed: 30997687
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 May;21(2):72-76
pubmed: 29650528
Stat Med. 2004 May 15;23(9):1351-75
pubmed: 15116347
Stat Med. 1999 Oct 30;18(20):2693-708
pubmed: 10521860
Stat Med. 2007 Jan 15;26(1):53-77
pubmed: 16596572
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jul 27;9:56
pubmed: 19635144