Race/Ethnicity and Perception of Care: Does Patient-Provider Concordance Matter?
Journal
American journal of perinatology
ISSN: 1098-8785
Titre abrégé: Am J Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8405212
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Sep 2022
02 Sep 2022
Historique:
pmc-release:
02
03
2024
pubmed:
3
9
2022
medline:
3
9
2022
entrez:
2
9
2022
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
We determine whether racial concordance between postpartum patients and obstetric providers (dyads) impacts the perception of quality of care among people undergoing intrapartum obstetrical procedures. This is a prospective cohort study of postpartum people who underwent operative vaginal or cesarean deliveries in the second stage of labor. Participants were asked to identify the race of their primary provider and complete the Interpersonal Processes of Care (IPC) survey, which assesses communication, patient-centered decision-making, and interpersonal style. The association of participant-identified patient-provider racial concordance with IPC scores was determined. The primary outcome was the IPC subdomain related to discrimination, and secondary outcomes included other IPC subdomains and IPC results by participant racial identity (Black, LatinX vs. White). Sociodemographic and biomedical data were extracted from the medical record. Bivariable analyses were performed. Of 168 patients who were approached, 107 (63.6%) agreed to participate and 87 (81.3%) completed the survey. The majority ( There were no significant differences in perceptions of IPC between racially concordant versus discordant dyads. However, there is an ongoing need to further clarify measures of quality of care in high-acuity obstetrical situations to remediate ongoing racial and ethnic disparities in adverse health outcomes. · Racial concordance between patient and clinician has been associated with improved quality of care.. · There are limited data on racial concordance and perceptions of operative obstetrical care (e.g., operative vaginal delivery).. · Racial concordance was not associated with differences in patient-perceived quality of care associated with operative obstetrics..
Identifiants
pubmed: 36055283
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755548
pmc: PMC10323858
mid: NIHMS1905729
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK092949
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001422
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 1;117(35):21194-21200
pubmed: 32817561
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;61(2):387-399
pubmed: 29346121
Semin Perinatol. 2012 Feb;36(1):2-6
pubmed: 22280858
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1235-56
pubmed: 17489912
J Public Health Policy. 2003;24(3-4):312-23
pubmed: 15015865
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;51(2):360-70
pubmed: 18463466
Du Bois Rev. 2011 Apr;8(1):115-132
pubmed: 25632292
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Oct;6(5):1011-1020
pubmed: 31236800
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2001 Aug;12(3):342-51
pubmed: 11475551
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):285-294
pubmed: 28079772
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1231-8
pubmed: 17594129
Birth. 2022 Sep;49(3):514-525
pubmed: 35301757
J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Sep;43(3):296-306
pubmed: 12467254
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):e168-e186
pubmed: 28937571
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;210(5):435.e1-8
pubmed: 24295922